Mafiascum.net

"CREATE MULTIBALL WIFOM"

i mean the oh so jokes are town indicative now is pretty much a scumclaim but this guy keeps talking and doing scummy things

@shinori you aren't looking at your posts objectively.
You say I skimmed your posts but I didn't.

Do you know how many reads you've given? 3. Dunn thing might be right but it's about your interpretation of his posts.
The other 2 are without any reasoning at all. And you gave others flak for doing the same. Why are you above suspicion when they are not?

just to make sure I'm properly projecting my reads I'll split my votes

VOTE: Anonymousghost
VOTE: Bujaber

In post 173, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 159, Shinori wrote:PReview edit: Dunn not reading ITT. Read the game I stated more stuff about you later but I guess maybe scum players wouldn't read the thread if they feel like nothing is happening?

But you were complaining about kokichi's vote on you for something you were doing, or does the off topic discussion save your post somehow?

Doesn't really matter what you posted afterwards, does it? You're making the same type of post you're complaining that Kokichi is, but because it was a vote for you you made up a problem with it

In the post that I voted you I literally stated I would give reasonings later.

That is not something Kokichi said or did along with pretty much every other vote on me.

I then, later on, gave reasoning for my vote on you.

Right now you're just cherry picking and it looks awful. You're also comparing grapes and oranges it feels like because had kokichi potentially said "I'll expand on this vote later." or anything along those lines I wouldn't have delved into what I said in response to Kokichi.

i almost want to doublevote bujaber because he's so scummmy but meh

In post 176, BuJaber wrote:@shinori you aren't looking at your posts objectively.
You say I skimmed your posts but I didn't.

Do you know how many reads you've given? 3. Dunn thing might be right but it's about your interpretation of his posts.
The other 2 are without any reasoning at all. And you gave others flak for doing the same. Why are you above suspicion when they are not?

Why is it required for me to out all my reads? I'm on a dunn scum read and I'm following that scum read.

The town reads are for reasons I don't care to out nor should I have to explain why I am townreading someone at this state in the game. If you are trying to pry reasoning for my town reads from me then you can go ahead and lynch me off cause I'm not gonna do that. I heavily feel those two people I stated are currently town though.

What did I give flak to people about? The only thing I've given actual 'flak' to people about is people voting me without any proper rhyme or reasoning. You're gonna have to expand and elaborate on this more because I feel you're grasping after you found out your push on me sucks.

In post 178, Shinori wrote:

In post 173, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 159, Shinori wrote:PReview edit: Dunn not reading ITT. Read the game I stated more stuff about you later but I guess maybe scum players wouldn't read the thread if they feel like nothing is happening?

But you were complaining about kokichi's vote on you for something you were doing, or does the off topic discussion save your post somehow?

Doesn't really matter what you posted afterwards, does it? You're making the same type of post you're complaining that Kokichi is, but because it was a vote for you you made up a problem with it

In the post that I voted you I literally stated I would give reasonings later.

That is not something Kokichi said or did along with pretty much every other vote on me.

I then, later on, gave reasoning for my vote on you.

Right now you're just cherry picking and it looks awful. You're also comparing grapes and oranges it feels like because had kokichi potentially said "I'll expand on this vote later." or anything along those lines I wouldn't have delved into what I said in response to Kokichi.

I didn't count your read on me because that came after my post. I'm talking about your dunn SR and your TRs on sakura and moment. I thought that was obvious.


@RC - why anonymousghost?

because i'm indiana jones

Okay since I have no joke radar and apparently I can't base reads on jokes at all..

Is your suspicon on him a joke or serious?

Since when are jokes scum motivated?

Hypocrisy is not a scumtell either.

its not the illogicality that i'm scumreading ftr
it's the way that he tries to argue to his apparent scumreads that his reads are legitimate
'oh jokes are a towntell now', 'you arent seeing your posts objectively', etc.
and it's a pretty strong scumread for how little he's done.

We can't generalize. Jokes are mostly nai, but RC's reaction gives me the impression he think reads can never be based on jokes.

I don't get why I can't sometimes townread a joke and sometimes scumread a joke.

Are you suggesting if I scumread someone I should ignore everything they say?
What if I'm wrong and by engaging them I'll know it?
What if I'm right and by engaging them others will see it?

I think it's a little silly angle for scum to push.

Although that probably should be NAI anyway.

Btw bujaber you responded to my post that was focused towards Dunn while not responding to my post that was actually in response to you. Just wanted to make sure you noticed that.

well I think he's scummy

like bujaber is straight up arguing with straw mans so

think the tunnel engines are gonna get started soon

@shinori fair enough, I misread that
But the one you directed at me I didn't think warranted a response.

I know you don't actually believe my post meant that I have 100% read accuracy. No reasonable player would. So I don't know how you want me to respond.
Also you're not just going to claim scum.

uh

i do and if u dont ur bad

what kind of IDIOT is ever wrong in a mafia game

Also wtf is even this post:

In post 165, BuJaber wrote:How is that a contradiction. His tone seems townie. Tone is fakeable and subjective. His joke was scummy. That's something much more tangible.

In post 196, RadiantCowbells wrote:uh

i do and if u dont ur bad

This is a response to which post?