Page 8 of 194

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 1:59 am
by Majiffy
Hello I am here

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:01 am
by BuJaber
In post 174, profii wrote:
In post 172, BuJaber wrote:Profii what was your previous avatar?
another pic of my dog i would guess... also yeah i was thinking that about the post above this :o
Guess I'll have to read some old games then, because that was not as helpful for me as I thought.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:10 am
by Varsoon
In post 164, BuJaber wrote:My crumbing skills are of the chart man. Nobody caught it last game nobody will this game.
Isn't the point of crumbs that people pick them up?
NOT THAT IT MATTERS EVEN IF YOU DO CRUMB SOMETHIN
LIKE IT'S NOT AS IF PEOPLE WILL PICK UP A GUILTY CRUMB AND ACTUALLY LYNCH ON IT
EVEN WHEN YOU EXPLICITLY. SPELL. IT. OUT.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:13 am
by profii
In post 176, BuJaber wrote:
In post 174, profii wrote:
In post 172, BuJaber wrote:Profii what was your previous avatar?
another pic of my dog i would guess... also yeah i was thinking that about the post above this :o
Guess I'll have to read some old games then, because that was not as helpful for me as I thought.
yea i remember not being able to read you right but ive played a few games since then - p. sure my wiki is up to date - i dont post ongoing games there.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:21 am
by BuJaber
In post 177, Varsoon wrote:
In post 164, BuJaber wrote:My crumbing skills are of the chart man. Nobody caught it last game nobody will this game.
Isn't the point of crumbs that people pick them up?
NOT THAT IT MATTERS EVEN IF YOU DO CRUMB SOMETHIN
LIKE IT'S NOT AS IF PEOPLE WILL PICK UP A GUILTY CRUMB AND ACTUALLY LYNCH ON IT
EVEN WHEN YOU EXPLICITLY. SPELL. IT. OUT.
That's what I thought at first but in my mind my crumb in overkill 1 was obvious and it didn't get picked up, so I don't trust myself to make it more obvious without outright spelling it out.

Your evidence is quite compelling until you realize it is a sample size of 1.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:38 am
by Varsoon
Sorry I don't have more games where I get an N1 guilty, crumb it, then get day-shot.
It's not exactly a common thing.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:39 am
by Varsoon
I've learned my lesson, though. If I ever get a guilty in another closed setup, I'm outright claiming it instead of beating around the bush for associative tells. That game might've been won if I just claimed that guilty.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:42 am
by pinturicchio
So, there are 26 of us. Game started with 22 of us confirming our roles. Now everyone confirmed their role, but only 22 have commented in this thread. I'm almost sure the four players who confirmed last, meaning that the game started before they confirmed their roles, were Wisdom, BuJaber, BrightEyedFish and DrewVa. That means that DrewVa saw that the game already started, but didn't come to say hi. That's rude.

VOTE: DrewVa

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:45 am
by pinturicchio
In post 182, pinturicchio wrote:So, there are 26 of us. Game started with 22 of us confirming our roles. Now everyone confirmed their role, but only 22 have commented in this thread. I'm almost sure the four players who confirmed last, meaning that the game started before they confirmed their roles, were Wisdom, BuJaber, BrightEyedFish and DrewVa. That means that DrewVa saw that the game already started, but didn't come to say hi. That's rude.

VOTE: DrewVa
Oh, by the way, PTs are open day and night, so they probably said hi to their team instead of everyone. Rude rude rude

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:45 am
by Thor665
In post 108, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 101, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 75, Thor665 wrote:That felt slimy to me.
You should probably sheep this wagon Cheeky.
I find this interesting, I think I remember you two going at it in Newbie 1836?
We did indeed. I'm pretending Thor isn't here so I can use it to mourn when he meets his untimely N1 demise.

He was so young :cry:
"Claims town read on Thor while playing avoidance card based off Thor attacking with 'slimey' scum case"

Just saying I'm not getting enough sheep.
In post 101, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 75, Thor665 wrote:That felt slimy to me.
You should probably sheep this wagon Cheeky.
I find this interesting, I think I remember you two going at it in Newbie 1836?
I'm not going to bother to look, but sure, I believe that.
Why does that make anything interesting?

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:47 am
by BuJaber
In post 180, Varsoon wrote:Sorry I don't have more games where I get an N1 guilty, crumb it, then get day-shot.
It's not exactly a common thing.
Don't you wish it were though?

Because I only read your posts here and the post you linked to. And I'm already amused.

It sounds hilarious.

Compared to your story though what happened in overkill 1 was lame. I crumbed my role. Town decided to mass claim before my crumb ever became relevant. We won before town needed to confirm my role. Most people seemed to believe it anyway so I didn't need to be all like "and this was my crumb right here".

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:48 am
by BuJaber
In post 182, pinturicchio wrote:So, there are 26 of us. Game started with 22 of us confirming our roles. Now everyone confirmed their role, but only 22 have commented in this thread. I'm almost sure the four players who confirmed last, meaning that the game started before they confirmed their roles, were Wisdom, BuJaber, BrightEyedFish and DrewVa. That means that DrewVa saw that the game already started, but didn't come to say hi. That's rude.

VOTE: DrewVa

It could just be that he saw how many pages there were and incorrectly assumed some heavy posting and didn't have time to read but had he actually entered the thread he would have seen it's mostly one word posts by RCE.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:49 am
by BuJaber
That reminds me.. RCE you never explained why cheeky being townie is interesting to you?

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 2:51 am
by pinturicchio
In post 186, BuJaber wrote:
In post 182, pinturicchio wrote:So, there are 26 of us. Game started with 22 of us confirming our roles. Now everyone confirmed their role, but only 22 have commented in this thread. I'm almost sure the four players who confirmed last, meaning that the game started before they confirmed their roles, were Wisdom, BuJaber, BrightEyedFish and DrewVa. That means that DrewVa saw that the game already started, but didn't come to say hi. That's rude.

VOTE: DrewVa

It could just be that he saw how many pages there were and incorrectly assumed some heavy posting and didn't have time to read but had he actually entered the thread he would have seen it's mostly one word posts by RCE.
Yeah, and it could be that they were attacked by a gorilla right after they confirmed they role. What's your point

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 3:02 am
by BuJaber
In post 188, pinturicchio wrote:
In post 186, BuJaber wrote:
In post 182, pinturicchio wrote:So, there are 26 of us. Game started with 22 of us confirming our roles. Now everyone confirmed their role, but only 22 have commented in this thread. I'm almost sure the four players who confirmed last, meaning that the game started before they confirmed their roles, were Wisdom, BuJaber, BrightEyedFish and DrewVa. That means that DrewVa saw that the game already started, but didn't come to say hi. That's rude.

VOTE: DrewVa

It could just be that he saw how many pages there were and incorrectly assumed some heavy posting and didn't have time to read but had he actually entered the thread he would have seen it's mostly one word posts by RCE.
Yeah, and it could be that they were attacked by a gorilla right after they confirmed they role. What's your point
Wait for the explanation then judge it.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 3:06 am
by pinturicchio
In post 189, BuJaber wrote: Wait for the explanation then judge it.
Got it. But it's more like "ask for an explanation" than judging.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 3:12 am
by BuJaber
Okay fine that does seem better than mine. Has the potential to speed up the response.

VOTE: DrewVa

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 3:30 am
by BrightEyedFish
In post 182, pinturicchio wrote:So, there are 26 of us. Game started with 22 of us confirming our roles. Now everyone confirmed their role, but only 22 have commented in this thread. I'm almost sure the four players who confirmed last, meaning that the game started before they confirmed their roles, were Wisdom, BuJaber, BrightEyedFish and DrewVa. That means that DrewVa saw that the game already started, but didn't come to say hi. That's rude.

VOTE: DrewVa
Ohhhhhhh

The first little bit of detective work I've seen so far, keep it up. I want to join!
VOTE: DrewVa

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:04 am
by Amzela
In post 175, Majiffy wrote:Hello I am here
TIL in Mafia, shitposting matters.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:05 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 141, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 40, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 38, RCEnigma wrote:We signed up for murder. It was promised.
Came up with 21(naturally I removed myself, and I'm in the list prior to that point, so that's actually 22), so RIP hebichan.
Nice try to look all random an casual
but you did what you did as scum.
Post doesn’t help either.
I expected more from Profii, RCE, and FL at this stage, off in the scum bucket. You can get out when you say nice things about me.
In post 47, hebichan wrote:Can I not be the day one lynch again? Please. I want to play a game one of these months.
VOTE: RCE
This post is towniness overload.

Let's go with the only reasonable and rational vote I can come up with right now:
VOTE: Reasonably Rational
1) I've never done anything randomly as scum. Actually, I've never done something randomly in a game of mafia, ever. At least, this head hasn't.
2) If I *had* done something randomly as scum, then my choice to do so now would have been specifically to see if people who I expected to catch it caught it(something I could do as either alignment, honestly.), as you'll see below.
In post 170, farside wrote:Hey kid.
I didnt finish reading but I hope things won't be this active all game.
I forgot how spammy these games get from the word go.

Anyways so far I have a scum read on RR and cherkteeky.
RR typically cerb is the wise and much more thoughtful of the hydra. His random vote and rational for his vote comes across as fake.
Cheekteeky looks like surface scum hunting. Basically asking questions that give nothing and read as oh I'm going to ask this because i can, not because i want a response.

VOTE: RR
Like so. +1 to farside for, in spite of not having played with us in a good while, still immediately catching and pouncing on the change in playstyle, which Varsoon(and others, who should know better) did not do.

If *this* is detective work, and deserving of sheeping, and also deserving of (essentially) some degree of town credit(since otherwise you wouldn't be sheeping it)
In post 192, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 182, pinturicchio wrote:So, there are 26 of us. Game started with 22 of us confirming our roles. Now everyone confirmed their role, but only 22 have commented in this thread. I'm almost sure the four players who confirmed last, meaning that the game started before they confirmed their roles, were Wisdom, BuJaber, BrightEyedFish and DrewVa. That means that DrewVa saw that the game already started, but didn't come to say hi. That's rude.

VOTE: DrewVa
Ohhhhhhh

The first little bit of detective work I've seen so far, keep it up. I want to join!
VOTE: DrewVa
How is *this* not?
In post 57, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 47, hebichan wrote:Can I not be the day one lynch again? Please. I want to play a game one of these months.

VOTE: RCE
hebichan, who was Bandit, and Town Desperado, was killed in Night 2.
15. hebichan, Human Wiretapper, Lynched Day Four.
hebichan, an Aspiring Hero, was lynched Day 5

???

VOTE: hebichan harder for unwarranted AtE in response to a meaningless push, which she used a lie to support.


-Cerb

Please elaborate on the differences between the two points made regarding why one course of action is deserving of sheeping, while the other is the act of scum.

-Cerb

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:07 am
by Reasonably Rational
Also, BrightEyedFish, I've never played with you before under this name. If you're a public alt can you tell me who you are so I can figure out the experiences behind the points you're making?

-Cerb

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:08 am
by Amzela
Aha. You cannot edit posts. That’s fun times. I apologize for accidentally quoting.

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:09 am
by Majiffy
In post 42, Malakitty wrote:I ROLLED TOWN GUYS.

VOTE: JIFFY.
Do you really want to hurt me
Do you really want to make me cry
In post 47, hebichan wrote:Can I not be the day one lynch again? Please. I want to play a game one of these months.

VOTE: RCE
Oh you sweet summer child, mafia is a game for masochists
In post 61, Thor665 wrote:I'm ready for this game like a breath of fresh air.

VOTE: RCEnigma

Cruising the counterwagon of cool.
VOTE: RCE
Choo choo mother smurfers
In post 117, Wisdom wrote:VOTE: majiffy
U wanna fokkin go m8 I swer on me mum
In post 121, Tails wrote:Yay!

VOTE: Majiffy
Hu da hell r u
In post 193, Amzela wrote:
In post 175, Majiffy wrote:Hello I am here
TIL in Mafia, shitposting matters.
Shitposting is a lifestyle, not a fashion statement

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:09 am
by Varsoon
You are right, usually RR hold their votes close to the chest.
Though I think I did recently (by which I mean in the last year or so) see a game where Cerb was way more vote-happy and it tripped me up
Though, thinking back, maybe that was Cerb out of hydra?
Cerb, do you know what game I'm taking about?

My memory is garbage though, so I could just be wrong. :/

Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2018 4:14 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 198, Varsoon wrote:You are right, usually RR hold their votes close to the chest.
Though I think I did recently (by which I mean in the last year or so) see a game where Cerb was way more vote-happy and it tripped me up
Though, thinking back, maybe that was Cerb out of hydra?
Cerb, do you know what game I'm taking about?

My memory is garbage though, so I could just be wrong. :/
We were very vote happy in our last overkill game(for us at least, lots of D1 wagon hopping to build momentum), which, if anyone actually read our PT, they would know was a deliberate change in playstyle to see what happened and who noticed. I'm unsure if there was another game where I/we were vote happy, but if so it wasn't a deliberate style change, more likely something about the game made it easier for us to reach the level of certainty we typically wait for before voting.

-Cerb