Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:18 am
Carcalily is still missing, right?
this is ruru right?In post 176, Blackjacks wrote:Where all my bad gals at?
Stop cringing at people's psots then
And while he's at it, this one as well?In post 140, Aster wrote:
- Do you know what RVS is?
- Do you think RVS is a bad thing?
- Is it a bad thing for players to generally have votes standing to indicate who they are most suspicious of, or to exert pressure?
- Would it be better if players only used words to communicate and only placed their votes when they were sure they wanted a lynch?
- Do you believe mafia will actually try to collectively quicklynch a bandwagon provided they can get three townie votes?
In post 152, Keyser Söze wrote:Why is Gamma’s reaction more likely from town-Gamma?
Would have scum-Gamma not called you out too, or kept quiet?
Keep my man's name out your mouth!In post 186, Keyser Söze wrote:I blame TW
If with "before the game starts" you mean "before Blackjacks received their role", then the entire post is NAI.In post 185, pinturicchio wrote:In other news, I didn't like BJs' entrance. The post was fine, I laughed, but seems like it was prepared before the game started. My problema with that is that it was a huge post and it's obvious that took a lot of effort. I tend to scumread people who puts that much of an effort on RVS; preparing a post before the game starts is past that line. Does someone else has another point of view about this?
by BJ's entrance do you mean 72 or do you mean 102?In post 185, pinturicchio wrote:By the way, I skipped the first discussion 'cause it seemed too early to be serious, but I'll read it now since, as I understand, it was serious for some players.
In other news, I didn't like BJs' entrance. The post was fine, I laughed, but seems like it was prepared before the game started. My problema with that is that it was a huge post and it's obvious that took a lot of effort. I tend to scumread people who puts that much of an effort on RVS; preparing a post before the game starts is past that line. Does someone else has another point of view about this?
We had 2 days of confirmation phase with an open thread. If that message was done before starting the game, why not posting it then and not waiting until the game starts? I could answer that question myself: I wasn't considering the confirmation phase as the actual game, but I didn't have a composed message at that time either.In post 188, Aster wrote:If with "before the game starts" you mean "before Blackjacks received their role", then the entire post is NAI.In post 185, pinturicchio wrote:In other news, I didn't like BJs' entrance. The post was fine, I laughed, but seems like it was prepared before the game started. My problema with that is that it was a huge post and it's obvious that took a lot of effort. I tend to scumread people who puts that much of an effort on RVS; preparing a post before the game starts is past that line. Does someone else has another point of view about this?
#102, of course. I think it was prepared before the game because it has some quotes of other games, it's way too well prepared to be done just when the game started.In post 190, Nibbui wrote:by BJ's entrance do you mean 72 or do you mean 102?In post 185, pinturicchio wrote:By the way, I skipped the first discussion 'cause it seemed too early to be serious, but I'll read it now since, as I understand, it was serious for some players.
In other news, I didn't like BJs' entrance. The post was fine, I laughed, but seems like it was prepared before the game started. My problema with that is that it was a huge post and it's obvious that took a lot of effort. I tend to scumread people who puts that much of an effort on RVS; preparing a post before the game starts is past that line. Does someone else has another point of view about this?
If it's #72 I can see you already just joking but if it is about #102 maybe you are serious...sometimes I don't know when you are being sarcastic...
If it's about #102, sure, it is a big post and mostly a pun, but why do you think that it actually was prepared before the game? She would have time to actually write it right there in my opinion?
Wouldn't it make more sense to call Gamma out for the RQS post for being pretty big and before the game even started? He put more effort in, IMO.In post 185, pinturicchio wrote:By the way, I skipped the first discussion 'cause it seemed too early to be serious, but I'll read it now since, as I understand, it was serious for some players.
In other news, I didn't like BJs' entrance. The post was fine, I laughed, but seems like it was prepared before the game started. My problema with that is that it was a huge post and it's obvious that took a lot of effort. I tend to scumread people who puts that much of an effort on RVS; preparing a post before the game starts is past that line. Does someone else has another point of view about this?
I agree in mostly everything, except the part of the game being boring. I see that as an emotion that goes beyond the game; I felt kinda sad with duckling replacing out and started looking at this game as a boring game too, but I couldn't do anything about it more than give it some time.In post 189, Keyser Söze wrote:I think those big posts are usually NAI (I bet they dump that regardless of alignment), but it’s how they move from that organically during early game that is more interesting.
I.e it took BJ 10 posts before he took his first meaningful bite into the game (after I pushed him for it) - behaviour I had flagged in my head.
“Games boring” - then do something pro-active
“Meme kinda scummy” - what’s he doing about that?
Actually, the quotes part is indeed a good evidence. The game had started it had been 2 hours, to actually write down that post, while going out of your way to link another game, it seems indeed to have been planned before.In post 193, pinturicchio wrote: #102, of course. I think it was prepared before the game because it has some quotes of other games, it's way too well prepared to be done just when the game started.
You're right. Problem is, I'm absolutely baffled by Gamma at this point; I've never seen him put that much effort in any game I've been with him before, and I've seen him as VT, town PR and scum, so I don't know what to say about his effort in here.In post 194, Springtrap wrote:Wouldn't it make more sense to call Gamma out for the RQS post for being pretty big and before the game even started? He put more effort in, IMO.In post 185, pinturicchio wrote:By the way, I skipped the first discussion 'cause it seemed too early to be serious, but I'll read it now since, as I understand, it was serious for some players.
In other news, I didn't like BJs' entrance. The post was fine, I laughed, but seems like it was prepared before the game started. My problema with that is that it was a huge post and it's obvious that took a lot of effort. I tend to scumread people who puts that much of an effort on RVS; preparing a post before the game starts is past that line. Does someone else has another point of view about this?
Lemme get our facts straight. There was only a single day of confirmation phase; you can verify by checking the timestamps of post 1 and 94.In post 192, pinturicchio wrote:We had 2 days of confirmation phase with an open thread.