Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:21 pm
In post 168, YellowSnow wrote:I'm working on it. But if Nikk thinks tttt is town enough to vote me for it I'll piggyback Nikk for now.
In post 168, YellowSnow wrote:I'm working on it. But if Nikk thinks tttt is town enough to vote me for it I'll piggyback Nikk for now.
in fairness that's wasn't solely my purposeIn post 172, Formerfish wrote:T's point is that he wanted to see who would hop off of the Nikk wagon
If you have 4 pencils and I have 7 apples, how many pancakes will fit on the roof?In post 173, YellowSnow wrote:How is attacking someone you were voting wrong?
I mean you weren't hyper agro apart from slamming me for being new. Especially with the perspective of seeing TTTT in action.In post 164, Formerfish wrote:I really try not to most times. Its just always something you know?In post 146, Alonzo wrote:I still don't trust Nikk at all.I would expect FF to open high aggroas either alignment.
Seriously.In post 179, TTTT wrote:We need to note who isn't here for this meltdown because if Yellow flips scum
it's pretty clear his partner isn't here
or they'd be screaming at Yellow in scumchat to STFU
you know what?In post 181, YellowSnow wrote:I'm not melting down.
There's a chance, but it's not where I'd put my money.In post 188, TTTT wrote:Do you think there's any chance he is scum trying to get you lynched?
I mean he is voting you
In post 135, YellowSnow wrote:I know you are reaction testing me which is fine, and I'm pretty sure you are town, but sometimes you have to lose the battle to win the war and I'm not willing to lose the war over you.In post 133, Nikk wrote:My scumleans aren't based on votes on me, so no.In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?
So you were pretty sure I'm town but that's not a strong town lean?In post 187, YellowSnow wrote:I didn't say it was that strong. But like I said, either he seems really transparent and willing to defend his arguments for day 1 or maybe he just doesn't like being defended/buddied. Either way it seems like a town reaction to me.
I try not to overreact on day 1. There's not a lot of information out there.In post 190, Nikk wrote:In post 135, YellowSnow wrote:I know you are reaction testing me which is fine, and I'm pretty sure you are town, but sometimes you have to lose the battle to win the war and I'm not willing to lose the war over you.In post 133, Nikk wrote:My scumleans aren't based on votes on me, so no.In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?So you were pretty sure I'm town but that's not a strong town lean?In post 187, YellowSnow wrote:I didn't say it was that strong. But like I said, either he seems really transparent and willing to defend his arguments for day 1 or maybe he just doesn't like being defended/buddied. Either way it seems like a town reaction to me.
OK. From your perspective why is Nikk voting you?In post 189, YellowSnow wrote:There's a chance, but it's not where I'd put my money.In post 188, TTTT wrote:Do you think there's any chance he is scum trying to get you lynched?
I mean he is voting you
Have you played on other websites?In post 191, YellowSnow wrote:I try not to overreact on day 1. There's not a lot of information out there.
But enough to give me a full throated defense?In post 191, YellowSnow wrote:I try not to overreact on day 1. There's not a lot of information out there.In post 190, Nikk wrote:In post 135, YellowSnow wrote:I know you are reaction testing me which is fine, and I'm pretty sure you are town, but sometimes you have to lose the battle to win the war and I'm not willing to lose the war over you.In post 133, Nikk wrote:My scumleans aren't based on votes on me, so no.In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?So you were pretty sure I'm town but that's not a strong town lean?In post 187, YellowSnow wrote:I didn't say it was that strong. But like I said, either he seems really transparent and willing to defend his arguments for day 1 or maybe he just doesn't like being defended/buddied. Either way it seems like a town reaction to me.
He wants to gauge if I am town with serious concerns about a L-1 vote or scum trying to buddy him, would be my guess.In post 192, TTTT wrote:OK. From your perspective why is Nikk voting you?In post 189, YellowSnow wrote:There's a chance, but it's not where I'd put my money.In post 188, TTTT wrote:Do you think there's any chance he is scum trying to get you lynched?
I mean he is voting you
Yes. Quicklynching is nearly always bad.In post 194, Nikk wrote:But enough to give me a full throated defense?In post 191, YellowSnow wrote:I try not to overreact on day 1. There's not a lot of information out there.In post 190, Nikk wrote:In post 135, YellowSnow wrote:I know you are reaction testing me which is fine, and I'm pretty sure you are town, but sometimes you have to lose the battle to win the war and I'm not willing to lose the war over you.In post 133, Nikk wrote:My scumleans aren't based on votes on me, so no.In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?So you were pretty sure I'm town but that's not a strong town lean?In post 187, YellowSnow wrote:I didn't say it was that strong. But like I said, either he seems really transparent and willing to defend his arguments for day 1 or maybe he just doesn't like being defended/buddied. Either way it seems like a town reaction to me.