Mafiascum.net

In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.

Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning


Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?

In post 174, Adelbert Steiner wrote:If you insist. I will simply laugh at the jokes on my own.

Isn't that what secrets are for?

The worst is town.
Firebringer and Adelbert are scum.
You're welcome.

I propose the ladies keep their gold count a secret

No innocent child in this version of the setup? Interesting

In post 177, Allomancer wrote:The worst is town.
Firebringer and Adelbert are scum.
You're welcome.

Good man. Not sold on FB scum but I'll take Adel.

The gentlemen who pairs with the lady with 8 coins can hammer a wagon by themself as the last vote before intermission

In post 175, the worst wrote:

In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.

Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning


Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?

If my memory serves correctly, you are fairly prone to fluff posting early on.

However, I would like to see this prior game to pass judgment for myself. Could you direct me to it?

People jumping on fb already are probably scummy

I haven't read anything yet

Are you ready to dance yet Dunn?

In post 177, Allomancer wrote:The worst is town.
Firebringer and Adelbert are scum.
You're welcome.

Reads are same.

So the lady with 8 coins should be extra careful about who she pairs with. I swear to god, if the worst has 8 coins, I'm done with this game.

I have a tinfoil s/s read on Adelbert and someone

In post 182, Dunnstral wrote:People jumping on fb already are probably scummy

scum read=/= jumping on people

In post 181, Adelbert Steiner wrote:

In post 175, the worst wrote:

In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.

Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning


Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?

If my memory serves correctly, you are fairly prone to fluff posting early on.

However, I would like to see this prior game to pass judgment for myself. Could you direct me to it?

How much experience do you have with me?

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=76441
This is the one.

In post 182, Dunnstral wrote:People jumping on fb already are probably scummy

I haven't read anything yet

Why even say that if you haven't read? Why not let it naturally progress instead of trying stifling it while you catchup?

I am busy doing a deep dive of Slaxx meta to figure out Alberts Alt/Main. This is insane.

I had no idea who Slaxx was at all and he has had way more games on here than I expected.

Actually I really don't like Dunn's entrance as it processes.

In post 190, Firebringer wrote:I am busy doing a deep dive of Slaxx meta to figure out Alberts Alt/Main. This is insane.

I had no idea who Slaxx was at all and he has had way more games on here than I expected.

I have more on lolwagons, have fun.

In post 188, the worst wrote:

In post 181, Adelbert Steiner wrote:

In post 175, the worst wrote:

In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.

Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning


Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?

If my memory serves correctly, you are fairly prone to fluff posting early on.

However, I would like to see this prior game to pass judgment for myself. Could you direct me to it?

How much experience do you have with me?

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=76441
This is the one.

Extensive.

Ank coming in here and claiming 8 coin 19 minutes into the game thread being open seems scum motivated. When you've got a tiny little brain it makes sense that you'd wait to see what other people think first, right? Seems like a scum move

Looked over the list of ladies. Clem is the only one I've played with before, so he'll be easiest to read. I reserve Clem for myself as long as I have a townread on him.

I'm kind of surprised it took this long for an Adel scumread to start appearing, the entrance to the game in of itself was scummy

Can you talk me through why you felt FireB's points against me as town were valid then? don't feel the need to wallpost just elaborate a little.

In post 194, Dunnstral wrote:Ank coming in here and claiming 8 coin 19 minutes into the game thread being open seems scum motivated. When you've got a tiny little brain it makes sense that you'd wait to see what other people think first, right? Seems like a scum move

That's NAI

I revealed because of my mood, most games as either alignment, I'd be grandstanding about it.

In post 194, Dunnstral wrote:When you've got a tiny little brain

Lolwat