Page 8 of 140

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:22 pm
by Fuscosco
Id like to hear from the rest of town, but from the above I feel I have a decent idea where I want to go.

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:24 pm
by ejjinami
Vote Count 1.4
Auro:
(3) Shoshin, volxen, scum reading
volxen:
(2) DoubtingThomas, Fuscosco
DoubtingThomas:
(2) Auro, RadiantCowbells
scum reading:
(1) Irrelephant11


Not Voting:
Demonlord, ‪GrandWazoo‬‬‬‬, Clemenc‬y

With 11 players alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2019-03-12 18:02:08)

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:27 pm
by Clemency
i dont think dt is worth voting
i dont see any scum motivation in their current play
they just remind me of another unhelpful contrarian we have on this site

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:28 pm
by Clemency
VOTE: auroL-2
because pressure is pressure even if i say it out loud

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:29 pm
by volxen
In post 174, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 167, volxen wrote:
In post 50, volxen wrote:VOTE: Auro

Let me guess, you rolled scum like you do in 95%+ plus of your games?
In post 58, volxen wrote:@RadiantCowbells I hope you rolled town for a change, because you've always rolled scum against me in our previous games together.
In post 62, volxen wrote:
In post 59, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 58, volxen wrote:@RadiantCowbells I hope you rolled town for a change, because you've always rolled scum against me in our previous games together.
:]
I've literally been wanting to play a game with town!you for like
months
.

@DoubthingThomas, you seem to find all of the above posts scummy/wolfy, even though you know I have played a lot with Auro, and with RadiantCowbells somewhat as well. Can you explain why they are such wolfy posts from your point of view?
Objective Fact Man Here.

Objective Fact 1 is that, in what world should I have known you, auro, and radiantcowbells play with each other a lot before i pointed out those posts you made were scummy?

Objective Fact 2 is that, I said I personally find talking about how "Hope XXX is a YYY alignment" is of little value for solving and I associate it with scums, a read made before i was told about your "meta"
And what about the possibility that it was town!me making a joke in jest towards Auro, because we play a lot together and he does, in fact, roll scum fairly often? I agree with you that such a joke doesn't help to solve the game, but it's also RVS and an early stage of the game, so I'm curious why you immediately jump to the conclusion that it's likely to be scum-indicative behavior.

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:29 pm
by RadiantCowbells
In post 178, Clemency wrote:VOTE: auroL-2
because pressure is pressure even if i say it out loud
You're voting the single towniest living player

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:30 pm
by Clemency
i'm aware

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:30 pm
by RadiantCowbells
Don't do that?

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:30 pm
by Clemency
when was the last time you saw the first wagon on a >9 player game go through

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:31 pm
by RadiantCowbells
In post 183, Clemency wrote:when was the last time you saw the first wagon on a >9 player game go through
I don't think in these terms.
There's no reason to have the vote I'd rather it not be there

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:31 pm
by Clemency
there's reason to have the vote

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:32 pm
by DoubtingThomas
are you guys seeing this?

I literally come into thread, thread has 4 pages, I read the posts, I point out couple posts I think is scummy, and just lightly vote in a still rvs-fested situation in the game

then auro says, "volxen just posts that all the time"

i am like ok, but i can do stuff without taking your meta of another player as a scripture in the bible and still vote when nobody else is saying shit?

and then RC comes out of nowhere attacking about how i am double downing and overreactingly defending myself on my "case" on volxen (except i was clearly just going off of a couple posts, as those were the only things I had)

and how I am scummy for not givng his reads "enough respect" based on games i played with him in the past, but which is just purely an atrocious thinking because he is expecting me to blindly sheep him every game then?

and then twisting this to make it seem like i am attacking his reads for no reason? even though he was the one who mentioned how from my previous experiences with him, i should know his town game enough or something to just sheep him? i dont understand the logic of this argument at all

and then he goes onto talk about how i should stop and it's better for me to just die if i am not gonna 'cooperate' with town or whatever lol even though the past 3 pages have just been all him and auro attacking me for a 4 page read on volxen and just refusing to take in volxen's "meta" fo rthe time being because it's really early in the game

RC complains about someone saying someone has a weak presence 4 pages in in the game, but is pushing me for trying to make content over only 4 pages, it's like me just voting a single player 4 pages in in the game should be forbidden?

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:33 pm
by Clemency
@dt who do you want me to vote rn

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:33 pm
by DoubtingThomas
also i am not sure what is up with RC trying to literally control people's votes so early in the game

"people shouldn't have more than 4 votes now" "don't vote him" etc

???? how will the game advance?

this is not similar to how RC played in my previous games with him, imo he's acting really strange here

VOTE: radiantcowbells

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:34 pm
by DoubtingThomas
In post 187, Clemency wrote:@dt who do you want me to vote rn
not too sure yet, but not auro. he is my strongest town read atm

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:35 pm
by Clemency
hm

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:35 pm
by Clemency
i feel like at least 2/3 scum are in the active pool rn

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:35 pm
by RadiantCowbells
DT is wolf

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:37 pm
by DoubtingThomas
In post 179, volxen wrote:
In post 174, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 167, volxen wrote:
In post 50, volxen wrote:VOTE: Auro

Let me guess, you rolled scum like you do in 95%+ plus of your games?
In post 58, volxen wrote:@RadiantCowbells I hope you rolled town for a change, because you've always rolled scum against me in our previous games together.
In post 62, volxen wrote:
In post 59, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 58, volxen wrote:@RadiantCowbells I hope you rolled town for a change, because you've always rolled scum against me in our previous games together.
:]
I've literally been wanting to play a game with town!you for like
months
.

@DoubthingThomas, you seem to find all of the above posts scummy/wolfy, even though you know I have played a lot with Auro, and with RadiantCowbells somewhat as well. Can you explain why they are such wolfy posts from your point of view?
Objective Fact Man Here.

Objective Fact 1 is that, in what world should I have known you, auro, and radiantcowbells play with each other a lot before i pointed out those posts you made were scummy?

Objective Fact 2 is that, I said I personally find talking about how "Hope XXX is a YYY alignment" is of little value for solving and I associate it with scums, a read made before i was told about your "meta"
And what about the possibility that it was town!me making a joke in jest towards Auro, because we play a lot together and he does, in fact, roll scum fairly often? I agree with you that such a joke doesn't help to solve the game, but it's also RVS and an early stage of the game, so I'm curious why you immediately jump to the conclusion that it's likely to be scum-indicative behavior.
my vote was also placed pretty early in the game and as you agreed, your posts "doesn't help to solve the game" so i voted you

you think just because you posted that in rvs i should be forbidden from voting you?

or does it make sense for me to vote you and start generating content?

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:37 pm
by DoubtingThomas
In post 192, RadiantCowbells wrote:DT is wolf
omgus

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:38 pm
by DoubtingThomas
In post 157, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 154, DoubtingThomas wrote:
In post 152, RadiantCowbells wrote:And there's a difference between being wrong and being belligerent and obnoxious and wrong.

Sure. When people keep telling you your read is bad your reaction shouldn't be to double down.
keep pushing me. i am just gonna wait until someone else posts something of value
I'm not voting you. I'm not pushing you. I'm telling you to stop.
3 minutes later, votes me

10 minutes later, "DT is a wolf"

purely manipulating posts. dudes not solving

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:38 pm
by Fuscosco
A clear readslist wouldn't hurt.

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:38 pm
by DoubtingThomas
RC is having the scummiest agenda i've ever seen a man push in a game of mafia

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:38 pm
by RadiantCowbells
lol

I've been calling you out for several pages and you just pointed that out so

can't exactly use that buzzword in this situation

Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2019 1:39 pm
by Fuscosco
Don' forget to leave out the rainbow colors, unspoilered 3 paragraph descriptions, and purely meta based reads.