Mafiascum.net

Thank you. Those were my thoughts as well. I am interested in others’ opinions as well.

In post 172, Chara wrote:do all talking flowers sound this suspicious? or, it might just be that gleeful look on your face...

what answer are you hoping to find by asking this question you already know the answer to?

I glossed over what "especially at this juncture" actually means; that is a valid reason after all.

an idiot?

i'm still curious about what you were looking for with your leading.

In post 177, Chara wrote:

who's

an idiot?

In post 178, Chara wrote:i'm still curious about what you were looking for with your leading.

Even couldn't help but feel swayed by Nacho's words, and it would me if others aren't townreading him too. So Amrun jumping to the conclusion of buddying when the townread is probably justified out at me.

do you think scum would rub shoulders with someone who a target it makes sense to befriend?
if i wanted to gain the trust of a larger group, i would probably also aim for someone who looks trustworthy to that group.
not that i would ever do that.

but we've established timing is the issue here, haven't we?

In post 129, alimdia wrote:No idea why you've voted for hectic based off your post

i believe he was following along with JTB, or as i've realized is a much more exciting name, Bartholomew.

what don't you like about the detective besides the way he talks?

In post 182, Chara wrote:what don't you like about the detective besides the way he talks?

Seconded. I don't understand why people are scum reading him enough for a hurt.

I'm coming round to the idea of hectic town now, despite my better judgement

To clarify, I don’t think japan-kun is buddying nacho because he TR him. It’s the content of the rest of the post. (Oh he’s so right on theory that I’m ashamed I didn’t think of it first!)

Being right in theory is also not why I TR nacho. I assumed this would be a completely obvious thing (flips are vital), and it’s a theory I expect nacho to espouse as either alignment because it’s accurate.

And his focus on basically saying “no, but u!!!!” is just deflection.

Even if I conceded we did the same things (which I don’t), two players can do the same things and one be scummy and one is not. It’s all about the manner in which it is done.

Two questions, Amrun:

1. Why do you town read Nachomamma8?
   
2. What are your thoughts on what I said regarding the Friendly Neighbor role?

1. I don’t really remember Nacho’s scumtells but he’s a good player and seems to be actively sorting and moving gamestate forward. We will do better if form together like two sides of a hatchet so for now I will treat him as town and re-eval as gamestate dictates.

2. It’s a pretty good strategy but I think it leads to an information less day. I think it’s better to proceed with the day as normal for now, but closer to deadline, revisit this. Scum knowing who the IC is will inform their play so as to render the interactions unhelpful. But it’s a good point worthy of discussion.

Thank you.

Did something interesting happen?

In post 158, Sujimichi wrote:

In post 155, Chara wrote:mostly fun and games, sure, and while it seems hide and seek has been cut short and now we're playing the

real

game, i don't agree that it was all empty fun to start.

If you could point out what you view as otherwise that would be helpful. I did not see anything I view as not joking.

besides the beginnings of a discussion that has continued until now on the merits of concentrating only on finding friends vs. a healthy amount of bloodshed in the name of progress, meaningful conversation has started as early as this little exchange.

In post 28, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Well we can get on opposite sides of that, I may as well get my scumread of him out of the way. Also, your opening was way less scummy than usual, and you usually do a really scummy opening as town. Worried about something?

HURT: Hectic

which would be why i punched Billy in the first place. i, erm... no hard feelings. just because you look similar doesn't mean you're the same.
...you look really similar, actually. ludicrously. are you just wearing a different shirt?

then came the detective, who in spite of his fancy book-words, had some things to say that probably aren't jokes, capped off by a comedy routine we all know and love by now.

In post 43, Hectic wrote:
HEAL: Billy


HURT: Sherlock

you know, the more i look... and especially the more i look at the posts from that annoying dog and his army of clones, who fittingly enough call themselves Hectic, the more i see there's content on just about every page of this game! i don't know if it's worthwhile to keep repeating it. by the third page it's basically no fun and games at all, except that it is. Nacho's entrance made a bit of a splash, but i take back what i said about him starting the game up.

i was expecting this to take more time...

In post 191, Asriel Dreemurr wrote:Did something interesting happen?

oh come on, Asriel.

we're the interesting ones, it's our responsibility to make it so. not the other way around!

In post 192, Chara wrote:

In post 158, Sujimichi wrote:

In post 155, Chara wrote:mostly fun and games, sure, and while it seems hide and seek has been cut short and now we're playing the

real

game, i don't agree that it was all empty fun to start.

If you could point out what you view as otherwise that would be helpful. I did not see anything I view as not joking.

besides the beginnings of a discussion that has continued until now on the merits of concentrating only on finding friends vs. a healthy amount of bloodshed in the name of progress, meaningful conversation has started as early as this little exchange.

In post 28, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Well we can get on opposite sides of that, I may as well get my scumread of him out of the way. Also, your opening was way less scummy than usual, and you usually do a really scummy opening as town. Worried about something?

HURT: Hectic

which would be why i punched Billy in the first place. i, erm... no hard feelings. just because you look similar doesn't mean you're the same.
...you look really similar, actually. ludicrously. are you just wearing a different shirt?

then came the detective, who in spite of his fancy book-words, had some things to say that probably aren't jokes, capped off by a comedy routine we all know and love by now.

In post 43, Hectic wrote:
HEAL: Billy


HURT: Sherlock

you know, the more i look... and especially the more i look at the posts from that annoying dog and his army of clones, who fittingly enough call themselves Hectic, the more i see there's content on just about every page of this game! i don't know if it's worthwhile to keep repeating it. by the third page it's basically no fun and games at all, except that it is. Nacho's entrance made a bit of a splash, but i take back what i said about him starting the game up.

i was expecting this to take more time...

Thank you. Aside from the slot I replaced, I was not able to see anything; however, I will re-read Hectic's post with a focus on removing his jest from his points.

what if we go for 2-2 and try to get the FN to be the "set-aside" player?

actually I'm not really sure how that works to be honest

Regarding the FN, wouldn't it be better if they claim day 2, that way most likely someone can back it up.

And we get day 1 info

This is an open game. The Friendly Neighbor does not have to be supported in its claim as a counterclaim will catch Mafia. I do not disagree with Day 1 information, as I believe Amrun described that best.

Did you read my post positing this theory and hers when asked for her opinion prior to making your post?

In post 182, Chara wrote:

In post 129, alimdia wrote:No idea why you've voted for hectic based off your post

i believe he was following along with JTB, or as i've realized is a much more exciting name, Bartholomew.

what don't you like about the detective besides the way he talks?

JTB's vote on hectic was an RVS I'm pretty sure (his first post) , so..... following along... with an RVS vote?
Also, Why are you answering for SherlockHolmes?