Mafiascum.net

In post 172, Egix96 wrote:I think you're being greedy, A50.

Not really. It's always good to know where profii's thought are (as either alignment)

In post 170, Egix96 wrote:

In post 165, Elsa Jay wrote:Oh god an actual jumble of letters. Fuck that.

VOTE: Dsjstr

I dont wanna remember a username like that. Can't even pronounce it. It's the devil's language.

I think it's supposed to be short for "DS jester"

I'm fine nicknaming him Jester then for now. Still a hard name to read tho.

In post 139, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 127, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Lurker slots is what we have vigilantes for.

killing lurkers for not being able to get engaged in a 50-player game is poor play at best and bullying at worst

change my mind

The person who’s lurking is usually active in Large Games.
And is currently active in ongoing games just not this one.

In post 175, Almost50 wrote:Not really. It's always good to know where profii's thought are (as either alignment)

I'm saying, if you already had one PT, why would you want another? But all right.

My general play-style Day 1 is to lurk in the background. Take a breath. Breathe out. 

I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.

I'll be observing in the background. Please don't assume that I'm not present when you're posting.

hectic would you mind observing while being parked on drixx?

In post 179, Hectic wrote:My general play-style Day 1 is to lurk in the background. Take a breath. Breathe out. 

I'll be observing Day 1, and going hardcore Day 2 and on. That's how I roll. I'll still pick at things during Day 1 if they catch my attention. I'm probably going to make a copy/paste post about this for all games I play, because it gets annoying when some ree in light of this information.

I'll be observing in the background. Please don't assume that I'm not present when you're posting.

Alright Cool.

In post 139, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 127, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Lurker slots is what we have vigilantes for.

killing lurkers for not being able to get engaged in a 50-player game is poor play at best and bullying at worst change my mind

Said the lurker.
HAH.

i wonder if we can get through this game without a single sub

In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.

you'd only know this if u were getting bussed so :/

does day play matter when there are 16 killing roles?

It matters when we're culled of half the list or slightly before/after that, depending on the situation.

In post 184, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.

you'd only know this if u were getting bussed so :/

So your actually saying that’s pure town that was on me?

In post 186, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: tse

Elaborate.

^there is none i read page 1

i mean maybe I'm just salty for getting OMGUS voted but

In post 154, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I just think people should be wagoned for something they did. How they did it. Why they did it.

your wagon was mostly an RVS shit wagon it seemed like and this post seems not right to me. Like he was taking his wagon way SRS and it sees p scummy to me.

it would be so funny if town wins n1

In post 188, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 184, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.

you'd only know this if u were getting bussed so :/

So your actually saying that’s pure town that was on me?

this is TSE trying to change the direction of questioning to something more favorable for him.

you said there was 1 scum voting you. Why that number?

die u scum bag

In post 191, Nero Cain wrote:i mean maybe I'm just salty for getting OMGUS voted but

In post 154, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I just think people should be wagoned for something they did. How they did it. Why they did it.

your wagon was mostly an RVS shit wagon it seemed like and this post

seems not right to me

. Like he was taking his wagon way SRS and it sees p scummy to me.

So me saying for there to be an actual solid reason to vote me is scummy?
Because when I solve I take those into effect.
“Why” “How”. Etc.

In post 188, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 184, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.

you'd only know this if u were getting bussed so :/

So your actually saying that’s pure town that was on me?

@Nero

Respond to this please!

In post 193, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 188, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 184, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.

you'd only know this if u were getting bussed so :/

So your actually saying that’s pure town that was on me?

this is TSE trying to change the direction of questioning to something more favorable for him.

you said there was 1 scum voting you. Why that number?

die u scum bag

At least 1 scum.

Do you still think saying that “I think there’s at least 1 Scum in a shit top wagon”
Is scummy?
Do you think it’s wrong?

Yeah.
Your my Top Scum Read RN Nero.

well you didn't say "at least" you said there was one and you phrased it as a fact. "There is 1 scum on my wagon" not "I think there is 1 scum"