Mafiascum.net

Sorry to hear the Paragon. Hope you have a speedy recovery!

Feel better para!

looking forward to greeting this replacement and getting things going full strength

In post 151, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 149, bob3141 wrote:And it in you never even deny being partnered with para. All you say is why would i comment on x if i wasnt going to vote for him. And that answers nothing.

As it easy for scum to say they would do the opposite

Where it should be clear im asking, ok so you say you wouldnt be partnered with para if you were scum but that doesnt realy answer anyones suspicions that your scum. And is rather scummy avoidance of that very issue.

I asked Dany about how pointing something suspicious about someone without voting them is indicative that we're partners. My line of reasoning was that calling attention to something is stronger than voting. I don't really know what you mean by the bolded phrase

From what I'm gathering, you're saying that town!tweet wouldn't say that she's not partnered with Paragon, she would instead say "I'm not partnered with anyone, I'm not scum." Why would I be unwilling to say the phrase "I am not scum" as scum???

I see where you're coming from I THINK. Like, I subconsciously say "I'm not with Paragon" instead of "I'm not scum" to technically say the truth. I don't think looking for ways that someone subconsciously words things is a good tell, and it's certainly not working here.

This is a little more like how i was expecting you to reply first time round if you were town. If you are town then my question certainly wasnt meant to be loaded. Was very much intended to prod you to go into further detail. Prob should put " because in your words" after it to be clearer

As it stood your breif reasoning was something scum could easily of thrown up. i never trust if i was x then i would do y posts. As its easy for scum to say that as scum they wouldnt do what they did. but i digress. So what about the issue you brought up about para did you think would serve. So are you saying you think no scum would ever make such a move unless they would have done something extra. as you say in this post vote for him for instance


Now if you are scum at this point i would have expected you to double down and push further rather than having a moment of hesitation. During bit of consideration. As it serves no interest for scum at this point to reply to me as although they are considering i am town. Serves no interest for scum even partialy to cut infront of their own push.



UNVOTE:

____

On side note.

Players make subconsciously slips all the time. Ive seen players push against a player using their own reasoning for doing x as ys reasoning. That was pops. Pretty much said the entire wagon on that player was all town.
So there is validity to see if it was a slip or simply mistaken wording. As slip tends to give extra details that result in the above being let out.

Now if you are scum at this point i would have expected you to double down and push further rather than having a moment of hesitation. Something scum

will catchup when i can as im in middle of my working week and dont have much time today

At moment im gut leaning on mav being town. His interactions with my wagon and push on tweet feel like it comes from towny motivation.

As even if scum do push against a growing wagon wanting simply to be on the right side of it. They tend to not try and diffuse any wagon. More adding fuel on to the fire while keep a pretext of defending it

And mav my gut reaction for now is that if para is twn then allom and cat are slightly like town. As early wagon if on town have tendancy to be all town most of the time. As scum if find tend to avoid them. Not strong read from that but a slight read

In post 173, iDanyboy wrote:

In post 168, BBmolla wrote:my votes in a good spot

where you at bby girl

Why, what has he done?

Yeah exactly that’s my case

Sup. Sorry I showed up late, it appears my invite got sent to the wrong house.

Now we can party.

In post 181, bob3141 wrote:And mav my gut reaction for now is that if para is twn then allom and cat are slightly like town. As early wagon if on town have tendancy to be all town most of the time. As scum if find tend to avoid them. Not strong read from that but a slight read

The Allomancer question to you isnt really relevant at this time. At the time of that post asking that question, I picked the player with the highest vote count and asked to see if you’d willingly jump on that and throw shade at them (aka would be okay with any wagon and ready to jump on) vs just tunneling on Morning Tweet. Town would be more likely to stay tunneled on Morning Tweet. Scum would be more likely to jump on any sorta wagon. As I’ve said before, I think you’re town or that was one helluva gambit trying to tunnel hardcore on Morning Tweet. I’m all for early game gambit plays by scum in a wifom-y way but to pick THAT battle......

Oh, while that dude is being replaced:


Fingers crossed for an active replacement...



I just find posts 44, 46, 59 strange. The fact that you disappeared after the attention went to Morning Tweet is about all I’ve got right now. I understand that the game did move fast, so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt for the latter.
Any thoughts on the game so far?

In post 62, Allomancer wrote:Also to be clear, there was no miller crumb.

In post 63, TheTrollie wrote:Wtf is a miller crumb

It's something along the lines of "I'm a Miller please actually read this post I will even put it in bold if your blind" kinda things. Incidentally I will never lynch a Miller day 1.

In post 159, Paragon wrote:!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2

Basically my response to the rest of the posts. I won't vote anyone ATM so if Bob wants to convince me of their innocence so be it.

turns out yes I know what a miller crumb is - it was when ppl were saying it was a miller slip that i thought it was some slip unrelated to the miller role. thanks

Bob's recent posts feel a bit more towny, but I'm still not sure. I think I'll wait and read his catchup before I reevaluate my read on him.

I feel strongly that bob is town - he's incredibly tunnel-visioned but town.

I don't like that wagon.

Bambi join my Skellen vote. After re-reading the thread today I feel very good about it.

Asking me immediately to get in your pocket? Very bold, good sir. I either need a good case or a bribe though. Unlike everyone else, I hold my vote in high value.

I think bob believes in the method's he's saying yes, but I don't know whether that makes him town. He's a puzzler. I do like the wagon though I think it's town driven

I'm a Miller

In post 193, BBmolla wrote:I'm a Miller

Not enough pizzazz. I'm not convinced.

lmao

Bambi we're gonna buddy up and solve this game, help me out I'm having trouble getting into this

I guess it's just cause I don't disagree with the Bob votes, but having gone down that road many a time and seeing Bob flip town every time, it seems kinda fruitless.

My case is in 138.

The Allo vote is also a convenient wagon to join to stay out of the current wagon without risking unraveling it. It reads like scum who was entering the game going around poking into various arguments but then finding a nice vote to place without real regard to the insights just laid out.

pedit (is that the right term here i forget?) Oh great - BB come along as well

Alright, who are you after then? I'd scroll and look at the VC but I wanna see your sales pitch.

I read this whole bob thing in detail today - there are no scumtells in anything he said. There was incredible conviction which people were reading as scum because they didn't agree that his reasoning was as flawless as he did. but he definitely believed what he was saying. thats my take.

so lets move it along and start talkking about literally any other interaction than the one we've spent nearly all of the first 8 pages on