Mafiascum.net

Votecount 1.4

Night 3 Roses(2)

~ Kilgamayan(11), ceejayvinoya(10)

ceejayvinoya(2)

~ Tuxedo Mask(18), Hoctac(24)

Tuxedo Mask(1)

~ HoldenGolden(34)

Kilgamayan(1)

~ enomis(3)

HoldenGolden(1)

~ DkKoba(36)

clidd(1)

~ Night 3 Roses(28)


Not Voting (1): clidd(0)

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-29 05:21:12)

FLAVOR

This detail of the façade pipes of Christian Dieffenbach's circa-1817 pipe organ at Altalaha Evangelical Lutheran Church in Rehrersburg shows the artistic paintings of Carol Kantner's great-grandfather, Jacob Dieffenbach.

In post 172, Night 3 Roses wrote:now i'm just confused. was that a tuxedo townread, ceejay scumread, both, or neither?

-D

But what were you going to say before Hoctac answered? When you thought the question was addressed as you.

sorry, there's not much point answering that yet.

-D

In post 171, Tuxedo Mask wrote:

In post 170, Hoctac wrote:To answer your first question, I wanted to move it from you!

Do you like to move your vote around? Does it help form reads? Or do you mean you're town reading me?

Yes, I think I do like moving my vote around.
You've been asking game progressing questions, so I don't believe you're in need of pressure. ceejay hasn't had an independent thought yet, so I believe he could do with some!

In post 165, Night 3 Roses wrote:

In post 161, Kilgamayan wrote:

In post 153, Night 3 Roses wrote:@Kilga, how do you feel about CJ sheeping you?

I am okay with it given I felt worse about you

them

than him when I posted. It helps that 158 is pretty much exactly the response I intended to give to 150, which itself feels like a disingenuous response. Particularly since (a) it doesn't make an attempt to address why my accusation is wrong, and (b) it doesn't differentiate between our post volumes. I would say someone who doesn't post a lot but offers alignment opinions when they do is townier than someone that does post a lot but doesn't offer alignment opinions, regardless of the actual content of those posts.

your own iso up to that point was 4 posts, all of which were either setup talk or non-game related, pot-calling-kettle-black. before i fell asleep, the only discussion so far was Setup Spec, the few KobavTux posts, and some people wanting to vote Holden (which I actually did ask about but got ignored).

i don't understand what you mean by (b)?
-D

The idea behind (b) is that I feel a larger volume of gameplay posts without alignment-related efforts comes across as "trying to look like one is being helpful without one actually being helpful" than a smaller volume of such posts, which could be explained as simply as "I have notable stretches of time throughout each day where I am able to pay little/no attention to the game". I will grant that it can be tough to dig up alignment opinions on ED1, but DkKoba was at least making such an effort, like with their vote for me (which happened early on and was something you could have made at least one alignment-opinion post about).

I also followed my vote for you a bit later with an alignment opinion on the DkKoba/Holden argument, which you could also have made at least one alignment-opinion by now but haven't.

Basically, for all your posting, I don't actually know what you think about the alignments of anyone in the game, whereas even with my current low volume of posts, I think I have some pretty obvious positive/negative opinions of a few players.

Hello all, I'm late, reading soon.

In post 175, GeorgeBailey wrote:

Votecount 1.4

Night 3 Roses(2)

~ Kilgamayan(11), ceejayvinoya(10)

ceejayvinoya(2)

~ Tuxedo Mask(18), Hoctac(24)

Tuxedo Mask(1)

~ HoldenGolden(34)

Kilgamayan(1)

~ enomis(3)

HoldenGolden(1)

~ DkKoba(36)

clidd(1)

~ Night 3 Roses(28)


Not Voting (1): clidd(0)

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-29 05:21:12)

Is there an RVS vote above ?

In post 7, Night 3 Roses wrote:hardclaim Night 3 Bulletproof

VOTE: clidd



-D

It is a hemorrhagic pleasure to see you again, Mr Datisi. I hope we can win in the same alignment this time.

In post 6, enomis wrote:Heya. See a few familiar faces.

VOTE: Kilgamayan

In post 9, DkKoba wrote:YEE HAW

In post 10, ceejayvinoya wrote:VOTE: Holden

Pew pew

In post 18, Tuxedo Mask wrote:VOTE: Holden The donkey knows what they did.

In post 29, Hoctac wrote:Hello!

Good playerlist. I think that the only person I don't remember playing with is Kilgamayan.

In post 36, HoldenGolden wrote:Hardclaiming insane novice macho cop/doc watcher btw

I remember you making some jokes in the initial stage of our past game, but nothing related to claims.

hi clidd im going to hardtunnel you again as you flip PR again

also my more hesitant to push people this game bc im not blue so its not as fun. 2/10 too many PRs

I mean, everyone that's not scum is going to flip PR :V

@clidd: I played two games here back in 2015 and this marks #3, so odds are p good we haven't played before together

In post 167, Night 3 Roses wrote:

In post 166, Tuxedo Mask wrote:What's your thought behind this vote?

is this @ me?

and it's pretty normal for clidd. there's probably 5-page essay coming by him any second now.

-D

I am fatigued recently by the number of games I am currently playing, so I’ll probably be more passive here. No essay this time.

In post 189, Kilgamayan wrote:I mean, everyone that's not scum is going to flip PR :V

@clidd: I played two games here back in 2015 and this marks #3, so odds are p good we haven't played before together

Can you show me a town game and a scum game of yours ? I would like to take a quick look.

In post 187, DkKoba wrote:hi clidd im going to hardtunnel you again as you flip PR again

You should try to be less aggressive in this game to avoid eating the NK. If I were scum, you would already be sentenced to death because of the last few pages.

Ok, im done reading. Kilgamayan and Dkkoba are likely town, I have a TL on them (maybe I'll change my mind If see something on Kilga's meta)

I would like to know Ceejay's opinion about the pushs on his wagon and why his focus is still on Night 3 Roses, and not on the accusers.

Both of my games here were Town games. This one was played to completion; this one was aborted.

Scum games are a little harder to sensibly and relevantly come by. My most recent scum game is here, which is also from 2015, but the mechanics of that game were a bit wacky. If you want something other than that, there were a couple of Anon games whose accounts have since been repurposed several times, and then a game from 2009.

In post 179, Kilgamayan wrote:

In post 165, Night 3 Roses wrote:

In post 161, Kilgamayan wrote:

In post 153, Night 3 Roses wrote:@Kilga, how do you feel about CJ sheeping you?

I am okay with it given I felt worse about you

them

than him when I posted. It helps that 158 is pretty much exactly the response I intended to give to 150, which itself feels like a disingenuous response. Particularly since (a) it doesn't make an attempt to address why my accusation is wrong, and (b) it doesn't differentiate between our post volumes. I would say someone who doesn't post a lot but offers alignment opinions when they do is townier than someone that does post a lot but doesn't offer alignment opinions, regardless of the actual content of those posts.

your own iso up to that point was 4 posts, all of which were either setup talk or non-game related, pot-calling-kettle-black. before i fell asleep, the only discussion so far was Setup Spec, the few KobavTux posts, and some people wanting to vote Holden (which I actually did ask about but got ignored).

i don't understand what you mean by (b)?
-D

The idea behind (b) is that I feel a larger volume of gameplay posts without alignment-related efforts comes across as "trying to look like one is being helpful without one actually being helpful" than a smaller volume of such posts, which could be explained as simply as "I have notable stretches of time throughout each day where I am able to pay little/no attention to the game". I will grant that it can be tough to dig up alignment opinions on ED1, but DkKoba was at least making such an effort, like with their vote for me (which happened early on and was something you could have made at least one alignment-opinion post about).

I also followed my vote for you a bit later with an alignment opinion on the DkKoba/Holden argument, which you could also have made at least one alignment-opinion by now but haven't.

Basically, for all your posting, I don't actually know what you think about the alignments of anyone in the game, whereas even with my current low volume of posts, I think I have some pretty obvious positive/negative opinions of a few players.

why such a difference between purely the volume of posts if they're all the same content-wise?

i was thinking of questioning koba, but tuxedo beat me to it, and i don't like butting in when i see someone questioning someone else. then when he said there hasn't been anything ai so far and didn't react to tuxedo calling it a joke, i figured it was just that.

do posts have to be made in the format of "x is town y is scum" for them to count? ico's earlier posts showed liking tux and disliking you and ceejay.

-D

In post 182, clidd wrote:

In post 175, GeorgeBailey wrote:

Votecount 1.4

Night 3 Roses(2)

~ Kilgamayan(11), ceejayvinoya(10)

ceejayvinoya(2)

~ Tuxedo Mask(18), Hoctac(24)

Tuxedo Mask(1)

~ HoldenGolden(34)

Kilgamayan(1)

~ enomis(3)

HoldenGolden(1)

~ DkKoba(36)

clidd(1)

~ Night 3 Roses(28)


Not Voting (1): clidd(0)

With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-05-29 05:21:12)

Is there an RVS vote above ?

multiple, i think (mine and enomis, might be more)

Re: 183, it's unfair how little Moriarty gifs there are and how little diversity there is between them when compared to Sherlock

-D

and it has fulfilled its purpose now
UNVOTE:

VOTE: ceejay

might give this more thought in the morning.

-D

Datisi, is there a reason you unvote before placing your vote on ceejay? If the reason is to show us you were voting for someone prior, I do not understand the logic as you did not include the person's name with the unvote. Strange.

I'll try to be back here later tonight