Mafiascum.net

Btw I had a link to when Quick used the word “null” in a sense but it’s purpose has been now that my prediction about Quick trying to appear like a noob has turned out to be correct all along.

Btw, “null” is an English word and not mafia exclusive, so prior mafia experience would never be a limiting factor. Anybody person over the age of 12 with a functioning brain could tell you what “null” means. And for those that don’t, there is no logical explanation to why noob!Quick couldn’t look up the definition. So with that being said, I’m going to let somebody else put up with Quick’s nonsense for the time being, because I neither have the patience nor the sympathy to put up with such rubbish.

In post 175, Poyzin wrote:purpose has been nullifiednow that my prediction

EBWOP, meant to italicize the word nullified to show that it’s a common term, and add a space. When Quick decides to stop being dense, I’d happily engage with him.

In post 75, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:UNVOTE: because out of RVS

In post 59, teacher wrote:

In post 57, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 49, Poyzin wrote:As a lesser but still impactful point, I also disagree with the town points awarded to Quick. For one, giving town points is in no way townie in and of itself, and there were already problems with Quick’s hasty rationale. However, GB giving town points to Quick after a total of 1 game-related post by Quick is already enough to raise alarm bells. I feel comfortable moving my vote out of RVS and towards someone who has a good chance of flipping scum.

I promise to follow Poe's law from now on.

That was a cheeky comment lmao. I was waiting for someone to continue the chain. I agree that Quick's.....

Quick

(sorry) assumption that active = Townie is too early.

But I don't think that usually comes from scum. Scum usually Null reads everyone so they can slide by without any resistance. And then "Null-scum" their partner in case they get lynched.

^this. There isnt much scum motivation to breezing into a thread, giving a quick townread, and disappearing. It felt careless/uncalculated. Thats why its a town ping.

I don't know about you, but there's a lot of motivation for doing that for me. It:
- doesn't take much effort
- shows that you have an opinion

While I agree that we were out of RVS, why wouldn’t you place your vote somewhere instead of staying unvoted? If you viewed the state of the game to be out of RVS, then shouldn’t you have formed opinions about players at this time?

^why to Jumble and not gibus who did about the same? (And thanks for the spectator answer)

In post 178, teacher wrote:^why to Jumble and not gibus who did about the same? (And thanks for the spectator answer)

I’m personally more interested in Jumble’s answer here. The short version is that gibus has only posted twice while Jumble has a larger quantity of posts, so I would’ve thought that Jumble would naturally be more involved with his opinions than, say, gibus. With that being said, I’ll also extend the question out to gibus.

In post 175, Poyzin wrote:Quick trying to appear like a noob

What planet were you born on?

Cmon I was enjoying his argument than an we was playing the noob card.

F’ing phone. An *se

In post 181, teacher wrote:Cmon I was enjoying his argument than an we was playing the noob card.

Could you elaborate? Who’s argument?

Oh man I just metaled to see if we played together since the name was vaguely familiar but no playstyle recollections. You were a short term replacement in my very first game on site.

@poyZin, yours - there was a degree of not picking up sarcasm in your responses to him — of course he k owns what null means.

Oy.

In post 185, teacher wrote:@poyZin, yours - there was a degree of not picking up sarcasm in your responses to him — of course he k owns what null means.

Stop interrupting my Scum hunting. I would like him to answer what planet he thought he was born on. Thanks.

In post 187, Quick wrote:

In post 185, teacher wrote:@poyZin, yours - there was a degree of not picking up sarcasm in your responses to him — of course he k owns what null means.

Stop interrupting my Scum hunting. I would like him to answer what planet he thought he was born on. Thanks.

No, I’m not going to answer that.

In post 185, teacher wrote:@poyZin, yours - there was a degree of not picking up sarcasm in your responses to him — of course he k owns what null means.

Huh, I didn’t realize that #151 was completely sarcastic then.

In post 188, Poyzin wrote:

In post 187, Quick wrote:

In post 185, teacher wrote:@poyZin, yours - there was a degree of not picking up sarcasm in your responses to him — of course he k owns what null means.

Stop interrupting my Scum hunting. I would like him to answer what planet he thought he was born on. Thanks.

No, I’m not going to answer that.

Okay, answer this then...

Is the earth round or flat?

In post 189, Poyzin wrote:

In post 185, teacher wrote:@poyZin, yours - there was a degree of not picking up sarcasm in your responses to him — of course he k owns what null means.

Huh, I didn’t realize that #151 was completely sarcastic then.

Wait, sorry, #140 was the post where the largest offense of not knowing what null means came up.

In post 191, Poyzin wrote:

In post 189, Poyzin wrote:

In post 185, teacher wrote:@poyZin, yours - there was a degree of not picking up sarcasm in your responses to him — of course he k owns what null means.

Huh, I didn’t realize that #151 was completely sarcastic then.

Wait, sorry, #140 was the post where the largest offense of not knowing what null means came up.

Because it wasn't sarcastic.

Quick can you explain your thinking then?

In post 193, teacher wrote:Quick can you explain your thinking then?

Sure. What do you want to know about?

In post 167, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:

In post 163, 72offsuit wrote:

In post 149, Quick wrote:Scum in their PT...

"Hey, let's tryhard this game, what do you say?"
"Sounds great! Fantastic even!"
"Okay, let's do this... Let's pushe the guy who generates the most discussion. That should be our plan."
"Okay, sounds good."
"Do you want to post first or should I?"

Wow.. chilling to the bone. This is like verbatim word for word my last scum game PT thread.

Wait, why'd you bring up your last scum game? Also, where is that scum game?

I was being sarcastic

For what its worth
Last noobie scum game:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11646864

Last scum game overall:
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82578

In post 194, Quick wrote:

In post 193, teacher wrote:Quick can you explain your thinking then?

Sure. What do you want to know about?

How you’re interacting with poyzin. You’ve been around the block to k ow what null is. Why were you not engaging with him? It felt - until this quote actually - like you were being atandoffish generally. What did you get out of it/what were you going for/etc

In post 177, Poyzin wrote:

In post 75, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:UNVOTE: because out of RVS

In post 59, teacher wrote:

In post 57, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 49, Poyzin wrote:As a lesser but still impactful point, I also disagree with the town points awarded to Quick. For one, giving town points is in no way townie in and of itself, and there were already problems with Quick’s hasty rationale. However, GB giving town points to Quick after a total of 1 game-related post by Quick is already enough to raise alarm bells. I feel comfortable moving my vote out of RVS and towards someone who has a good chance of flipping scum.

I promise to follow Poe's law from now on.

That was a cheeky comment lmao. I was waiting for someone to continue the chain. I agree that Quick's.....

Quick

(sorry) assumption that active = Townie is too early.

But I don't think that usually comes from scum. Scum usually Null reads everyone so they can slide by without any resistance. And then "Null-scum" their partner in case they get lynched.

^this. There isnt much scum motivation to breezing into a thread, giving a quick townread, and disappearing. It felt careless/uncalculated. Thats why its a town ping.

I don't know about you, but there's a lot of motivation for doing that for me. It:
- doesn't take much effort
- shows that you have an opinion

While I agree that we were out of RVS, why wouldn’t you place your vote somewhere instead of staying unvoted? If you viewed the state of the game to be out of RVS, then shouldn’t you have formed opinions about players at this time?

I have formed opinions about people here. I just didn't feel like those opinions were strong enough to use my vote on. Now with that being said...

VOTE: Quick

I'm just not a huge fan of his constant sarcastic replies.

In post 196, teacher wrote:

In post 194, Quick wrote:

In post 193, teacher wrote:Quick can you explain your thinking then?

Sure. What do you want to know about?

How you’re interacting with poyzin. You’ve been around the block to k ow what null is. Why were you not engaging with him? It felt - until this quote actually - like you were being atandoffish generally. What did you get out of it/what were you going for/etc

I often don't answer stupid questions because it can implicate people based on their reaction to that. Poyzin looks pretty bad in my eyes.