Mafiascum.net

[quote="from No Result wiki"[It is important that moderators word "no result" PMs to be clearly distinct from "negative result" PMs.[/quote]

I could claim I had a reading error and actually got a negative result, if I can come up with a plausible fake results PM that I misinterpreted. I can probably play off me saying no result because I just "assumed" that was true because GB was dead. I could say I went to the thread at the start of D2 to see who died before I checked my result PM. Then when I came back to my result, I skimmed it quick, thought it said I got no result (which I already knew it didn't matter because I saw GB was dead), and I didn't return to read it more closely until people started bringing it up.

Thoughts?

Alternatively, could I claim a "False" role or possibly getting Vanillized? Would that be considered normal?

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=False
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Vanillaiser

If I do claim that, I need to claim no result again tomorrow.

In post 175, VP Baltar wrote:

from No Result wiki wrote:It is important that moderators word "no result" PMs to be clearly distinct from "negative result" PMs.

I could claim I had a reading error and actually got a negative result, if I can come up with a plausible fake results PM that I misinterpreted. I can probably play off me saying no result because I just "assumed" that was true because GB was dead. I could say I went to the thread at the start of D2 to see who died before I checked my result PM. Then when I came back to my result, I skimmed it quick, thought it said I got no result (which I already knew it didn't matter because I saw GB was dead), and I didn't return to read it more closely until people started bringing it up.

Thoughts?

Alternatively, could I claim a "False" role or possibly getting Vanillized? Would that be considered normal?

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=False
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Vanillaiser

If I do claim that, I need to claim no result again tomorrow.

EBWOP

In post 170, Alduskkel wrote:

@Mod
NPOM kills Billy.
NPOM jails hellbooks.

we can change it if we want later but I just want to have something submitted

Received

In post 172, VP Baltar wrote:wait, thought you wanted to rolecop hellbrooks?

I do think jailing makes a lot of sense though and is probably more powerful

Yeah, jailing because it guarantees no tracker result unless Datisi really is the tracker (which is why you wait for Datisi to say something on Day 3 if Billy doesn't flip Tracker).

As for the "no result" thing... I would say claim you misread/misunderstood the PM due to hasty reading/seeing the GB kill before the investigation result PM. Claiming to be "False" or vanillaized would be transparently fake. ("False" isn't even normal.)

It is now Day 3

Gold star for Aldus!

So now I could claim a positive on hellbrooks to just put the masons fully, or I could fake a positive on Andres to try to get us another ML if we think it is worth sacrificing me tomorrow

MLG PLAYS

Not sure yet whether a fake positive on andres or a true positive on hellbooks is best. Let's see how things develop.

Ok, so Dats claims mason and doesn't out hellbrooks. I say I go for hellbrooks and then when Datisi tries to claim they are masons together, people will call bullshit on 3 masons and say Datisi is gambiting

Any thoughts on my results claim are welcome. Hellbrooks will result in mass claim, with everyone claiming VT.

Me claiming a false result on Ico or Tess could result in a ML, with me eating it the next day and Andres as a possible final ML.

I'm a little worried that if I out hellbrooks, the yeet could shift back to NPOM

Fortunately, I had all of them in my "if Bob flips town" pool:

In post 2128, VP Baltar wrote:In post 2127, Datisi wrote:
and if bob were to flip town?

If Bob flips town, my gut says I should look somewhere in the hellbrooks/Tess/Ico/NPOM/Koba pool.

I think you claim a pos result on hellbooks and we play for an andres miselim today. Tomorrow you claim a pos on the weakest townie and we try to win there.

Ok, sounds good

or if after mass claim town is like "yeah 3 masons is bs" we can swing that way instead of going for andres

That would be amazing

HERE WE GOOOOO

In post 2500, Andresvmb wrote:How in the world is this a game with 3 Masons? What?

ohoho

never mind he immediately voted me

I'm going to take a run at Andres maybe. He was a bit weird after I said I had a positive. And now he is griping in thread that there are three confirmed town hahahaha

Hopefully my pivot onto Andres comes across as organic. I think I built up to it well enough.

You're definitely making stronger points. Andres is relying on dead town as his reasoning, which isn't likely to be persuasive I think

Lol Andres arguing with three scum. I'm sorry buddy

I'm not

Taking my time on this Andres push. I don't want to scare people off from running it up too fast.

Going to be very interested in what Koba claims here

The elephant in the room is if DKK would town fake claim?