Theres also the possibility of mafia giving heterogeneous numbers on different number of games, but consistently trying to get at least one high
So we could have situations when most towns can go for 4/5/6s, few towns go 1/2/3, few towns go 13 and Mafia always goes 1/5/13 or shenanigans like that
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:36 am
by word321
But it is important and relevant that mafia gets higher prs more consistently, that I agree
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:36 am
by word321
not that their more likely to choose low numbers
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:39 am
by DrDolittle
That's a lot of words to say nothing
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:40 am
by word321
Specially considering scum is also interested in killing the high Town picks; so what remains can be indeed indicative of scum
OC, none of this can be applyed by itself
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:40 am
by word321
whats ur intention voting Iamusername?
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:43 am
by Grumpy Cat
In post 174, word321 wrote:To ascertain Mafia goes for higher numbers more likely we must first compare if their apparent efficiency fits with the efficiency of simply knowing their other numbers only, and not due to choosing higher numbers
Mafia pick higher numbers! Why they do is irrelevant but I'm going to argue about it anyway.
%_%
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:44 am
by word321
mafia getting higher places on the pick is different that going for higher numbers
it was a commentary either way
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:46 am
by word321
Im not doubting they dnt get higher places, Im doubting that the particular
Numbers
they pick are higher, cause they can coordinately pick a wide range of numbers; NO town can pick 1 and get away with it if mafia always pick 1, therefore it is less likely that town with high numbers will get good roles if they can be "blocked" for example, while mafia gets both the chance of getting away with it and at least decent roles if they also pick a safe alternative for someone else, like a high number
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:48 am
by Datisi
In post 172, word321 wrote:I dnt like DrDolittle a.k.a. Doc from now on VOTE: DrDolittle
can you talk about this instead?
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:48 am
by DrDolittle
He jelly I'm number 1 pick and therefore the best
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:49 am
by word321
heyya datisi, long time no see
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:49 am
by word321
I want motivation of vote
if it was for pressure, it wasnt followed by no direct confrontation to the slot for more content
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:50 am
by Datisi
not quite true, i was the backup of 2019
but yeah, been a minute. got any hot takes for me?
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:51 am
by word321
The timestamps also indicate that it was highly reactive in nature, in the sense that he voted based on a single interaction without waiting for the particular follow uo
so I think he saw iamusername's entrance, found it particularly scummy for some reason or requiring more content, all of wich a priori is nonindicative, but hasnt given a follow up more than a vote; either way, some content from that slot would be nice
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:53 am
by Grumpy Cat
In post 187, word321 wrote:I want motivation of vote
if it was for pressure, it wasnt followed by no direct confrontation to the slot for more content
