Newbie 2035 - Movie Facts (Game Over)

Salsabil Faria · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:22 am

In post 117, AuroraDash wrote:Regarding TheDuke, it doesn't look like anybody voted for him until after he made his one post. I think it looked like a random vote -- like the rest of us made -- with some humour thrown in, rather than a reaction to anything.

Salsabil: Does the green text mean anything, or are you using it to make your posts look nice? I'm just curious.

no no, it doesn't mean anything

I just love colors, so, decide to use different colored texts in different day thread

(only, if I will alive!)

Titus · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:27 am

In post 165, Zurel wrote:Well, all right then.

Actually Titus, can you explain why did you scumread Norway? I can't follow the reasoning, sorry.

In post 23, Titus wrote:
In post 21, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 19, Town looter wrote:VOTE: Titus AND VOTE: Norway

You know why.
Why?
My guess is Manatee's mafia.
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.

I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.

I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)

Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.

Titus · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:28 am

There's also the meta reason in that he's different from Manatee's mafia where he was town and I was scum. Meta's a weak way to view players though.

Salsabil Faria · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:31 am

My head is spinning right now! Can't discuss/understand game at this moment, see you guys tomorrow.

Trendall · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:32 am

Titus can be seen in previous games saying that 'meta is garbage'.

But in this game when it's convenient for her it can be brought up and is no longer garbage. It's 'weak' now, but still suddenly worth bringing up in the conversation.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:35 am

In post 176, Titus wrote:Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.

Well i'm not really being defensive, more like aggressive.
Because i'm quite certain you're bad.

Zurel · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:36 am

I have a very strong feeling that I'm misunderstanding what lynchbaiting means. Can someone please explain? Thank you.

Titus · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:38 am

In post 181, Zurel wrote:I have a very strong feeling that I'm misunderstanding what lynchbaiting means. Can someone please explain? Thank you.

Lynchbait is a slot that's town but is real easy for scum to take advantage of and lynch.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:38 am

In post 181, Zurel wrote:I have a very strong feeling that I'm misunderstanding what lynchbaiting means. Can someone please explain? Thank you.

Lynchbait is a player, typically town that acts in a very scummy or clueless manner. And is thus an typical player scum would attempt to push as a elimination.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:38 am

Don't worry Titus, i can explain how the game works to the newbies once ur gone.

Titus · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:39 am

In post 179, Trendall wrote:Titus can be seen in previous games saying that 'meta is garbage'.

But in this game when it's convenient for her it can be brought up and is no longer garbage. It's 'weak' now, but still suddenly worth bringing up in the conversation.

Weak is a polite way of saying garbage.

Titus · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:40 am

People also specifically asked if my read was meta.

Trendall · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:41 am

So you're telling us that your own argument is invalid?

Titus · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:43 am

In post 187, Trendall wrote:So you're telling us that your own argument is invalid?

The meta part only. Some people love meta. I don't. I was just specifically asked if my read was meta.

Titus · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:45 am

See 165.

Trendall · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:45 am

But then if you were being truthful the answer would be 'no, I do not have a meta read, I don't believe in meta', surely?

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:46 am

In post 188, Titus wrote:
In post 187, Trendall wrote:So you're telling us that your own argument is invalid?
The meta part only. Some people love meta. I don't. I was just specifically asked if my read was meta.

You literally are calling your own argument invalid. Meaning you actually admit i'm town. Good stuff.
As for my play in this game i don't believe you've seen enough to justify your read on me and the way you placed your vote.

Titus · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:49 am

In post 190, Trendall wrote:But then if you were being truthful the answer would be 'no, I do not have a meta read, I don't believe in meta', surely?

That would be dishonest. Something can not match meta but not be useful in determining a read.

For instance, if someone made the argument

"Everytime someone wears a blue shirt, it is sunny.
John wears a blue shirt.
Therefore, it is sunny."

We know the premise is bullshit. It can still be sunny and John can still be wearing a blue shirt.

Here, I have a meta read but meta doesn't mean a thing.

Titus · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:50 am

Coincidence =/= causation.

Here Norway is scum. His meta doesn't match. He is not scum for that reason but all the other reasons I detailed.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:51 am

You are being ridiculous Titus.
I've detailed countless reasons why your push on me isn't genuine, and you're still just arguing with Trendall about this meta shit.

Titus · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:56 am

In post 176, Titus wrote:
In post 165, Zurel wrote:Well, all right then.

Actually Titus, can you explain why did you scumread Norway? I can't follow the reasoning, sorry.

In post 23, Titus wrote:
In post 21, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 19, Town looter wrote:VOTE: Titus AND VOTE: Norway

You know why.
Why?
My guess is Manatee's mafia.
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.
I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.

I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)

Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.

This is why Norway is scum.

@Norway, I am not arguing with Trendall but explaining. He's confused in good faith. You aren't.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:58 am

It's good to know you're spewing Trendall as town.

Trendall · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 5:58 am

Generally when people think an argument is invalid, they don't then go on to say that argument out loud, because what would be the possible town-sided motivation for presenting invalid arguments?

I'm not remotely confused, thanks.

Titus · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 6:01 am

In post 197, Trendall wrote:Generally when people think an argument is invalid, they don't then go on to say that argument out loud, because what would be the possible town-sided motivation for presenting invalid arguments?

I'm not remotely confused, thanks.

I was specifically asked if the meta matched in 165. Generally that is correct.

Titus · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Thu Oct 15, 2020 6:01 am

Also, if you understood, you'd be voting NorwegianboyEE.