Mafiascum.net

In post 172, ItalianoVD wrote:I don’t think there’s anything else I’m gonna get from the bakslash slot. You’ve been putting your thoughts down and having more interactions. What are your thoughts on padwag and Rockhopper?

UNVOTE: bakslash

I feel as if Padwag is town. I don't really think scum would do a reaction test so early in the game, seems a bit risky. As for Rockhopper, I don't have much of an opinion on him.

In post 170, padwag wrote:

In post 169, Bakslash wrote:

In post 154, Facebones wrote:Thoughts on their little chess match? Could it mean something? Could it mean nothing?

If I'm gonna be honest, this seems like a scum move. It looks like Facebones is throwing out a random idea and seeing if town will think anything important of it. I know its a bit of a weak read but I just wanted to throw it out there.

I think the chess match thought is just a chess match thought (although this may be worth looking into if facebones flips scum)

Wouldn't be too shocked if it is.

In post 142, MiniMegabyte wrote:

In post 141, padwag wrote:Where do you find an image to put as your avatar

I just got mine off google

I got mine off of https://avatarbox.net/ the website has pictures with small sizes so he should be able to make it his mafiascum avatar.

Edit avatar

The URL you specified is invalid.

*Visible frustration*

In post 179, padwag wrote:Edit avatar

The URL you specified is invalid.

*Visible frustration*

Just download it and click the "Choose Image" button on your avatar page

In post 169, Bakslash wrote:

In post 154, Facebones wrote:Thoughts on their little chess match? Could it mean something? Could it mean nothing?

If I'm gonna be honest, this seems like a scum move. It looks like Facebones is throwing out a random idea and seeing if town will think anything important of it. I know its a bit of a weak read but I just wanted to throw it out there.

I'm not sure if it's a scum move, but I think it's silly to think there's a ploy behind the chess stuff

In post 162, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 114, Rockhopper wrote: I don't have a read on Billy yet, but I'll take a look at your arguments.

Okay, that’ll be good. Look forward to what you have to say about it.

Billy's stream of consciousness posting is what stands out to me. Is it something he normally does?
I'm pretty neutral with respect to your other reasons though.

I didn't like the initial vote on pad, but his justification seems fine.
And about the pocketing attempt, it could just be town solving, no?

There's a really good chance that scum exists outside of {bakslash, padwag}.
VOTE: Norfolk, purely a gut vote.

In post 171, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 165, padwag wrote:Italiano, what do you think of minimegabyte? (If you have no opinion on them that's fine)

I played with Mini twice I believe and she was townie both times. I haven’t really seen her scum game before so I wouldn’t know what to look for, but as of now I’m townreading her.

Can you talk more about this?
What do you find towny about her so far?

In post 152, Facebones wrote:I'm getting more townie feels from rockhopper currently

Wanna form a townblock?

In post 182, Rockhopper wrote:

Billy's stream of consciousness posting is what stands out to me. Is it something he normally does?[/quote]
I had this exact thought, because whilst it's a great method of keeping your responses clean and directly to the point it's a cracking way to boost your activity.

Anyway, the answer is yes. I checked game 2028 and he did the same thing.

I like it. No room for confusion over what he's responding to and less chance of his questions being missed.

I screwed the quote up.

Rockhopper, that was a response to 182.

But he was scum in 2028

I didn't read that far. I was just looking for the continuous posts.

In post 190, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:I didn't read that far. I was just looking for the continuous posts.

Oops, didn't mean to spoil, sorry

No worries.

I didn't think it was alignment related, but as you say, it stood out. I like it as a posting style; very clean and easy to follow.

Do you consider it alignment related?

In post 183, Rockhopper wrote:There's a really good chance that scum exists outside of {bakslash, padwag}.
VOTE: Norfolk, purely a gut vote.

Anything in particular giving you that gut feeling?

Norfolk Boy1 wrote:No worries.

I didn't think it was alignment related, but as you say, it stood out.

I like it as a posting style; very clean and easy to follow.

Disagree. Comes across as intentionally confusing and chaotic for mine, but we all view things differently

Face, do you play on a phone or laptop/PC?

I'm on a phone and I often struggle with the site, particularly quoting and post formatting. The 'one thing at a time' formula in Billy's posts suits me in that regard.

Sorry I wasn’t active today guys been really busy and it’s now 1am imma head off to sleep but will catch up tomorrow

In post 193, Norfolk Boy1 wrote:Do you consider it alignment related?

Not in this case, looks like he does it as either alignment.

Thanks for trying to help. I am grateful, even if my tech skills are incurably bad.

UNVOTE: bakslash

I will catch up later this evening. Friday was more exhausting that I had initially thought.