Mafiascum.net

In post 164, Rannygazoo wrote:Interesting that you lump those two together. For me, it’s alchemist and superbowl9 who are most similar. But alchemist is just null to me. They’re not contributing, but they’re not contributing first. Then superbowl9 sees that they can get away with a content-free playstyle and follows suit.

What?? True I haven’t done much but where do you get that i’m playing off anime guy’s style without having a 4K view into my mental state? You really think I sat back and said “ahhhh time to contribute, OH WAIT! Another player isn’t contributing!! Awesome, now I can relax and shitpost rest of game gg town”??

Feels like the whole game is centered around Titus ATM when from my skim she didn’t say anything abnormal

In post 176, superbowl9 wrote:Feels like the whole game is centered around Titus ATM when from my skim she didn’t say anything abnormal

would you rather it be centered around me?

In post 176, superbowl9 wrote:Feels like the whole game is centered around Titus ATM when from my skim she didn’t say anything abnormal

That's for one of the following reasons

1) I am wrong on Ranny and voting me to keep two pockets of town fighting is a good idea, particularly if the goal is to persuade BM. This would imply that at least one scum is moving to pocket me as well.

2) I am right on Ranny and scum are hoping to divert and discredit my push, so they recycle the point Ben made while doing nothing to push the game forward. They're hoping I get so bogged down in trying to persuade the town of the rationale behind my play that they can push through my wagon on the grounds that I am defensive.

Regardless of which is correct, I would look at Non and hessian for scum as they did little to engage the thread's content.

In post 178, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 176, superbowl9 wrote:Feels like the whole game is centered around Titus ATM when from my skim she didn’t say anything abnormal

would you rather it be centered around me?

Your play certainly is odd this game, but it reminds me of T v A. I'll let you persist for awhile, but I'll be watching you for content or results soon.

In post 180, Titus wrote:

In post 178, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 176, superbowl9 wrote:Feels like the whole game is centered around Titus ATM when from my skim she didn’t say anything abnormal

would you rather it be centered around me?

Your play certainly is odd this game, but it reminds me of T v A. I'll let you persist for awhile, but I'll be watching you for content or results soon.

I just won 2 scum games is why, in the same day and a half.

In post 172, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 159, OutWorldER wrote:UNVOTE:

I thought 59 and 87 were scummy at first but I reread and I can actually see the viewpoint now, it just took me a minute.

i have a couple places I'd want to go for votes but first:

@ranny

why are you pushing up superbowl and ignoring NPOM completely? I'd argue NPOM's posting is even more devoid of content than superbowl?

@alchemist

you stated impressions on BM and Titus, what's your impression on ranny, the guy you're currently voting?

It’s actually null. I voted there for a joke but I don’t see a reason to move my vote yet.

If you voted as a joke originally but see no reason to move your vote at this point, can you elaborate why your vote is no longer a joke but deserving of staying?

I think Ben and I won a scum game at the beginning of this year as well. Might have been last year, though

Flavor Leaf, what relevance does your track record as scum have?

In post 184, Titus wrote:Flavor Leaf, what relevance does your track record as scum have?

What relevance do you want it to have?

It was a clear answer to why I haven't put effort into this game at this time.

In post 183, Flavor Leaf wrote:I think Ben and I won a scum game at the beginning of this year as well. Might have been last year, though

and with this, I just like Ben.

In post 185, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 184, Titus wrote:Flavor Leaf, what relevance does your track record as scum have?

What relevance do you want it to have?

It was a clear answer to why I haven't put effort into this game at this time.

Not sure how that actually correlates to you not putting effort into this game.

In post 187, benhalkum wrote:

In post 185, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 184, Titus wrote:Flavor Leaf, what relevance does your track record as scum have?

What relevance do you want it to have?

It was a clear answer to why I haven't put effort into this game at this time.

Not sure how that actually correlates to you not putting effort into this game.

I will eventually, I just need a break from using my brain.

and when I start playing, it's not like y'all gonna like it anyways, lol

im on auto pilot mode right now here. I might even just take the whole game easy, and pop out and solve outta nowhere.

for all you lot know, I'm just doing this for reactions.

I'm good at creating hard discussion points, and changing the game's feel.

I also asked Superbowl if they'd rather me be the center, so I figured I'd take over whilst autopiloting.

It's playtime for me.

Looked it up.

Mini Normal 2102.

And honestly, now that you bring it up, right now you completely seem scum to me based upon your play style there and how you're being now.

In post 192, benhalkum wrote:Looked it up.

Mini Normal 2102.

And honestly, now that you bring it up, right now you completely seem scum to me based upon your play style there and how you're being now.

And your thoughts when it comes to me specifically trying to get your attention whilst doing the exact same thing I did in that game?

Down to the negative utility claim.

I initially planned to use that as a way to feel out if you were town or not because I thought they were going to keep wagoning you, I was meaning to help you out with it if you needed it, but I already knew you wouldn't need me based on that game.

In post 194, Flavor Leaf wrote:Down to the negative utility claim.

This had about 3 usages when I posted it earlier, and they'll come out sometime this game probably, but they're not actively that important. Just a way for me to get a read on some people.

In post 193, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 192, benhalkum wrote:Looked it up.

Mini Normal 2102.

And honestly, now that you bring it up, right now you completely seem scum to me based upon your play style there and how you're being now.

And your thoughts when it comes to me specifically trying to get your attention whilst doing the exact same thing I did in that game?

Not sure. Maybe assumed I wouldn't look it up as you know typically I'm pretty inactive?

.

.