Mafiascum.net

elimination

1. Titus [0]:

2. Andresvmb [1]:

geraintm

3. unwnd [0]:

4. Flavor Leaf [0]:

5. Hank Spankems [0]:

6. shellyc [3]:

Andresvmb, PlusJOYED, Titus

7. PlusJOYED [0]:

8. Not_Mafia [1]:

Hank Spankems

9. JohnnyFarrar [1]:

shellyc

10. geraintm [0]:

11. TheFuzzyLogic99 [0]:

12. Dunnstral [2]:

nopointinactingup, Flavor Leaf

13. nopointinactingup [2]:

unwnd, Not_Mafia

Not Voting [3]:

JohnnyFarrar, TheFuzzyLogic99, Dunnstral

mod notes

~ Titus V/LA until Sunday

In post 164, shellyc wrote:

In post 160, JohnnyFarrar wrote:

In post 104, unwnd wrote:Pointedly self-assured and unwilling to compromise for his own ideals

It's only scum when he breaks that mold in ways that give him thread brownie points

Can anyone back this up? Because I don't like the last part here

In post 156, unwnd wrote:IMO I'm not thinking that hard into it yet, which is why I was like 'nothing interests me.' Trying to read into who has the informed POV right now when the game is again just starting and feels barren seems like just leading yourself into a trap

I usuallyread based on tone, then my logic follows that and I fill the spaces in-between. I think tonally Nopoint's aggression seemed misplaced

quote

specific

posts that lead you to think this?

johnny im like ever-so-slightly better on because i think effort is AI for johnny

I'm not changing the way i give my reads just because you asked me to lol

In post 143, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ FL- how can you tell. Doing a little more of nothing still gets you nothing. Anways Not Mafia is giving all indication of his town game. He did this last game as town and in the other game I saw where he is town.

I just create talking points, see what happens from them, analyze from there. I don’t think NM is scummy per se, but he’s posting more than he usually does this early from my experience. Yeah, he always trolls, but i actually think he did more this time.

I don’t know where I stand with it, though, because it’s day 1 not mafia.

Regardless, i wanted my thoughts on the matter there for ISO reasons for later in the game.

In post 145, shellyc wrote:flavour, can you back up that meta read of yours with links?
FL seems a bit overconfident which I'd expect from scum!him more because flavour treats playing scum as performing/theatre (quite like myself)

Meh. Later.

I’m overconfident always, always performing. My posts also come off more confident than I am, that’s just a tone thing that doesn’t come across how I always want it to via forum.

I’m past sc7m reading him for it, and i might have been wrong. He said i was, and i didn’t feel like arguing it because i didn’t have a strong case with it, more just something i was feeling at the time. I’ll look into it more later in the game if it pings me.

Shelly’s posts in that area are a bit fluffy.

I am noting people pushing nopoint right after I joined Dunnstral.

In post 71, shellyc wrote:

In post 15, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Why didn't you vote? Also explain?

i voted in my post EXACTLY before that so...?

it was a joke. but newer scum often greet the entire thread as an opening. (no offense andres)

I’m not a newer player, and I try to be friendly as either alignment (at least to start). You’ll find plenty of games on my home site where I come in and greet people generally. It depends on my mood.

UNVOTE:

I’m leaving Town on shellyc. I’ll catch up on the rest of the arguments later.

^leaning*

This feels like a town!andres game

I get an intentionally passive vibe from FL atm

?????????

That is a correct analysis.

I am completely phoning this game in right now.

I'm just trying to start a fight

Like let's get something going.

We need to get a wagon on me? Get some votes on me. I've won like 4 games in a row now, all decently recently.

*pulls sword out*

weird pov if FL is town though. intentionally playing passive -> tries to start a fight *through passivity* -> ???

Were those game scumgames? I understand your ego in that regard

idk how i feel about the response it seems overly calm

unwnd, whats your take on FL?

there is a conspicuous gap in your earlygame reads in that FL is not brought up

I think he has an insatiable ego and any attempts to reason with him are usually just ignored

Are you just going to give up solving him or ...?

Absolutely not, but rest assured I ran into headaches attempting to do in the last game we played, which in turn made me feel foolish

I'm not really down to that again, so I am hesitant on preemptive judgment of what is transparent anti-town play

In post 193, unwnd wrote:Were those game scumgames? I understand your ego in that regard

I just won a town game with you, dude.