Mafiascum.net

Ok, it was a bluff, that was a reaction test; I retract my statements

To FaC

In post 176, flow trap wrote:To FaC

fac?

anyway I'm hopping off for a bit

In post 174, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 172, flow trap wrote:EZ, would you agree that mafia doesn't want attention?

No not at all. Being the loudest voice in the room can help you control town or at the very least blend in.
Depends on how anxious the player is.

Players who intentionally fly under the radar are going to be noticed and come under fire.

So town would fly under the radar more?

In post 177, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 176, flow trap wrote:To FaC

fac?

Fredrick

In post 174, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 172, flow trap wrote:EZ, would you agree that mafia doesn't want attention?

No not at all. Being the loudest voice in the room can help you control town or at the very least blend in.
Depends on how anxious the player is.

Players who intentionally fly under the radar are going to be noticed and come under fire.

That is bass ackwards...

In post 181, safebet222 wrote:That is bass ackwards...

I have to agree I am confused?

Probably he meant, mafia want get gold midway.

Not so loud, not so silent. Of course, it depends on situation.

In post 175, flow trap wrote:Ok, it was a bluff, that was a reaction test; I retract my statements

Noted.

In post 174, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 172, flow trap wrote:EZ, would you agree that mafia doesn't want attention?

No not at all. Being the loudest voice in the room can help you control town or at the very least blend in.
Depends on how anxious the player is.

Players who intentionally fly under the radar are going to be noticed and come under fire.

My opinion on the matter is the following. The mafiosoes have motive to do exactly what was stated in the post quoted. However, they also have motive to do the exact opposite.

In post 179, flow trap wrote:

In post 174, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 172, flow trap wrote:EZ, would you agree that mafia doesn't want attention?

No not at all. Being the loudest voice in the room can help you control town or at the very least blend in.
Depends on how anxious the player is.

Players who intentionally fly under the radar are going to be noticed and come under fire.

So town would fly under the radar more?

No? Town would commit, create reads, and not cause confusion.

So Fred... What do you think of the reactions so far? Do you still think I am deserving of your vote?

In post 186, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 179, flow trap wrote:

In post 174, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 172, flow trap wrote:EZ, would you agree that mafia doesn't want attention?

No not at all. Being the loudest voice in the room can help you control town or at the very least blend in.
Depends on how anxious the player is.

Players who intentionally fly under the radar are going to be noticed and come under fire.

So town would fly under the radar more?

No? Town would commit, create reads, and not cause confusion.

I created no confusion... I comitted to geting this game moving...and it worked. Plus, I didn't like enchant trying to impose some new fangled meta on us.

If I didn't know any better, I'd think that enchant is trying to pocket Salsa. She was quick hammered by Not_Mafia and enchant in Newbie 2042 during D2 and they passed that shit off as a lolhammer that enchant rode into F3 and won for mafia.

All this new meta stuff might just be a ploy aimed at Salsa. Enchant, did you draw mafia again?

In post 187, safebet222 wrote:So Fred... What do you think of the reactions so far? Do you still think I am deserving of your vote?

You are worthy of my vote. Hence, my vote is on you.

In post 190, safebet222 wrote:All this new meta stuff might just be a ploy aimed at Salsa. Enchant, did you draw mafia again?

Yes, oh wait i mean no.

In post 192, Enchant wrote:

In post 190, safebet222 wrote:All this new meta stuff might just be a ploy aimed at Salsa. Enchant, did you draw mafia again?

Yes, oh wait i mean no.

In post 191, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 187, safebet222 wrote:So Fred... What do you think of the reactions so far? Do you still think I am deserving of your vote?

You are worthy of my vote. Hence, my vote is on you.

I mean can you at least tell me why? Please?

About hammers. This site is first where i see it exists. Really.

Early i just played with system "Vote for someone, and after this, everyone vote should execute him or no", so mafia just can't place final vote and get scotfree. They need to lie/decieve, not just abuse fast fingers and online.


I want minimalise possibility of some mafia/townie placing final vote and claiming "Oh sorry didn't saw that", and save self from thinking, did he on purpose or no. Also it saves possible PR and actually costs nothing.

Yo, not a dirty flaker, late here and will read through tomorrow.

In post 188, safebet222 wrote:

In post 186, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 179, flow trap wrote:

In post 174, esotericzoomer wrote:

In post 172, flow trap wrote:EZ, would you agree that mafia doesn't want attention?

No not at all. Being the loudest voice in the room can help you control town or at the very least blend in.
Depends on how anxious the player is.

Players who intentionally fly under the radar are going to be noticed and come under fire.

So town would fly under the radar more?

No? Town would commit, create reads, and not cause confusion.

I created no confusion... I comitted to geting this game moving...and it worked. Plus, I didn't like enchant trying to impose some new fangled meta on us.

highly debateable

allez