Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2021 5:39 am
actually I like this more rn
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Meuh
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Meuh
Between this and me being null and still your vote, I am curious why are you voting me? It does feel weird when you've gone out of your way to imply that your vote is serious yet you aren't using it on a SL/SRIn post 173, Kazyan wrote:I'm not sure what to think about eth0s. His posts fit with a pattern of "breaking up the townbloc" and adding to the Meuh dogpile, but that seems okay for now.
This, however, tracks. Emphasis mine--Harumi uses hedging word choice even in this sentence.In post 168, Harumi Ayasato wrote:This isIn post 122, marcistar wrote:Harumiim kinda not vibing with, but thats probably because their reads seem so noncommittal to me.Spoiler:
what i mean is,
This is because a quick skim of Harumis messages i seemed to have skimmed over their reads (their reads dont rlly stand out asreads), but when i looked and saw 76 i saw reads in that post. Looking at the reads, it seems like "krazy seems townbuuuut maybe.." "italiano seems townbuuut maybe.." and "kazyan might be townbut maybe" (that is what i mean by noncommittal.. they seem so unconfident with those reads. To me, it gave the impression they dont really want any backlash?probably justme instinctively hedging, since I'musuallynot willing to present something as an absolute truth unless I know for sure it is.
You're saying your vote on Kazyan is OMGUS? I've always thought of OMGUS as specifically "I'm voting this personIn post 154, eth0s wrote:Wait I'm stupid Kazyan is voting me so it is omgus. Or could be called that I guess. Meh, whatever.
Sure! I have had no reason to go back on my point in 64, basically. Your maintenance of colored votes after Krazy townread you for them has not changed my opinion about being performative.In post 181, Meuh wrote:Kazyan, from what you've said, I'm youronlyscumread, and afaik you haven't explained the read at all? I'd like justification for it!
I just think if you're town it would be helpful to put your vote where your scumspicions are. I'm not asking you, or anyone else for that matter, for a read list (yet). Just as I haven't given (or even fully formed) my own yet. But I do think if someone goes to the lengths to discuss serious vote importance and what their reads are, their vote should reflect those things. I don't know if I really accept shyness at this point given how your voting pattern looks troublesome to me, but I don't think it's overly concerning yet as long as we can come to some understanding of what merits a voting action.In post 177, Kazyan wrote:I'm being very sloppy with keeping my vote up-to-date because I'm shy about voting for scumleans instead of full scumreads. There's definitely scum that I haven't identified, and I don't want to help them sink a townie for flimsy reasons. The only person who has graduated out of "lean" territory, so far, is 2ndchosen1, and that's on the town side.
It's a good point, though. Being shy doesn't help the town. UNVOTE: , and I'm going to case Harumi now.
I mean, no, I don't view my own reasoning as OMGUS but I am just used to it being perceived that way without much challenge when one votes their voter. Which is a perception I was trying to avoid altogether but obviously something I cannot control when I am (was?), in fact, voting for the person who voted me. If your experiences in cross voting differs then I can see why you'd think it's odd for me to bring it up, but I am just being mindful of my own past experiences.In post 180, Cantripmancer wrote:You're saying your vote on Kazyan is OMGUS? I've always thought of OMGUS as specifically "I'm voting this personIn post 154, eth0s wrote:Wait I'm stupid Kazyan is voting me so it is omgus. Or could be called that I guess. Meh, whatever.solelybecause they're voting/attacking me". And you talked about other reasons you found Kazyan suspicous, so how would that be OMGUS? (Not voting someone just because they were voting you first is a weird reason not to vote someone. Cross-voting naturally occurs all the time.)
Additionally, you're now voting Meuh. Your catchup in 146 indicated a little suspicion on Meuh based on their vote progression, but then you also say you like Meuh's explanation. But then I don't see anything else in your posts discussing why you suspect Meuh, so...why are you voting Meuh? Especially after going to lengths to explain why you don't like cross-voting/looking like you're OMGUSing, identifying a possible alternative suspect (IVD), and then voting Meuh (when Meuh is still voting you)?
Yeah, that’s fair. I haven’t played mafia based on actual scumreading in months and I’m unfamiliar with this website, I’m having a really hard time actually putting my ideas into words, which sucks.In post 186, 2ndchosen1 wrote:Meuh, I believe that you're being scumread as your listings are just that. there's no real substance to them beyond "THIS IS MY CURRENT POSITION". it's a weak iioa that doesn't advance any position or generally help. If anything it appears like an attempt to look like you're trying to solve.
I don’t know about that. I asked you a question and you gave me a politician’s answer. I will give you that maybe our personalities are just clashing.In post 168, Harumi Ayasato wrote:I'm pretty sure this was a miscommunication. Maybe the other players can vouch for the clarity of my response on this one?
I can respect this, in the short term.In post 187, eth0s wrote:I do not yet wish to talk about why I am voting Meuh instead of Kazyan.
And...ok on this, too? I still don't understand the mindset of "Vote Kazyan! Oh wait, they're voting me, so it could be construed as OMGUS. Ok, if I had to vote someone not voting me, it'd be Italiano. Yeah, I don't want to vote Kazyan who's voting me...Vote Meuh, instead (who's also voting me)!"eth0s wrote:And what I said about Italiano was so surface level that you might as well consider it a joke. I know that isn't particularly helpful but really I was saying based solely off of memory and feels that Italiano was the name that stuck out when considering people that were not voting for me.
+town for the re-evaluation.In post 188, Kazyan wrote:P-edit for 2ndchosen1: I said a Krazy/Harumi team, not a Krazy/marci team. It seemed plausible to me that an SE would be thinking ahead towards ELo by making close friends with one person and feeling around how everyone else responded, while the newcomer just tried to generate openings. I am now rethinking that, given what Cantrip said.
I was mostly going for a mild reaction test to see how you'd respond to a naked vote without reasoning. You get a +town for the evenness of your tone/casualness, but that's tempered a bit by it being your first order of business in that post. Given that it's not in chronological order with your other observations, it feels like you're a bit more concerned with my vote on you than your tone lets on.In post 190, ItalianoVD wrote:@Cantrip: Why are you scumreading me, just curious? I think I may have missed your reason.
Any female gym leader from the Pokemon series.In post 193, Krazy wrote:I'll get to that in a bit Kazyan. First I have a side question for you. I am going to do a readslist with gifs themed around anime husbandos and waifus. I am not sure what to do for you -- is there any particular anime characters you'd like me to use?
Don't think it's scummy, but not sure how it relates to the quoted stuff above it.I was thinking that it was almost a bit odd for no one to have voted me around the middle of page 3 but Meuh did. I don't necessarily love the circumstances of the vote, but I think Marcistar said it best.
Still looking for what you meant from this post.In post 163, eth0s wrote:Krazy your demeanor reminds me of how I often play scum
This post is *really townie*. Like, high grade town material right here. The self-conscious awareness of his own biases toward how 2nd is playing is really, really good. I don't even agree on the take about 2nd's scumgame or range, but as far as quick takes go, this one really knocked it out of the park for me. High town basically based on this post. And if 2nd flips scum, which I think he does, this is like, really not scum theater to me.In post 162, eth0s wrote:Oh, the player named 2nd. Like I said it's much closer to feelings than reads for me right now. I like the way 2nd talks and the structure of their analyses. I think that biases me to feeling good about them. I feel based off of what little they have said they are capable of playing a convincing scum game.
Very town -- scum almost never opens the game trying to pocket me for my avatarIn post 12, marcistar wrote:krazys pfp do be cute doe
if tonereads are good, this is townIn post 28, marcistar wrote:just whoever doesnt call me beautiful is scum ofc
this again feels very townIn post 31, marcistar wrote:how long is the random vote phase thingy meant to last its so hard to make votes during it..
townieIn post 44, marcistar wrote:I do agree with krazy that emojis isnt really alignment indicative.
It's good conversation for early game I think, but if it progresses later on dont let the emojis cloud your judgement!! I think actions > emojis
townieIn post 56, marcistar wrote:3. I think you shouldn't stop talking if you can. Once the less talkative people join in, they'll be able to see that the game is indeed hella popping and itll be harder for inactive scummies to hide!! They'll have to give input eventually, while if the talking tones down, they might not feel the need to..
does this make sense? i hope i worded it right?
townie. also good to knowIn post 81, marcistar wrote:TBH I feel like i'm tunneling you too much right now Meuh because we're friends.
townie. also okay with the harumi read in this postIn post 122, marcistar wrote:I gotta be super cautious about them, but i don't think they're super scummy as of right now.
pinged me a bit, and that makes it hard to go hard town hereIn post 93, Cantripmancer wrote:@Marcistar: Are you scum?
which pings me a little, I definitely don't townread this slot before 101.In post 101, Cantripmancer wrote:Preview edit: I will lol so hard if this is a Marci/Mueh scumteam.
this feels like a pretty townie reevaluationIn post 145, Cantripmancer wrote:..might not be a definite tell, but I have a hard time seeing mafia going to lengths to find/remember a specific post from *checks date* a year and a half ago[!], highlighting it as comparable to a current post, using it to base a read, and then basically unpacking it and saying "ok, it probably doesn't feel comparable to anyone else (and it was a joke post, to boot), but I'm going to persist in my town read because of it". Not to say that mafia can't put in that kind of effort, but not only are there easier ways to fake a townread (or townread a buddy), but that kind of thought process feels just as likely to attract scrutiny as it does to achieve anything else. So...
Trip having me as both top scum and town is actually really townie LMAO. I actually had the same feeling about Dunnstral recently in the Tenet game, I could even link the readslist where I had him as bottom scum and top town simultaneously. I think my playstyle tends to generate a lot of paranoia and this feels like a pretty townie approach to me. I guess if there was a point against this, it'd be because I'd already pointed out I slightly townread convoluted day 1 reads of me in discussing Kazyan, but I still really liked this readslist and the followup to it.In post 140, Cantripmancer wrote:Town:
Marci
Meuh
Kazyan
Krazy*
Null:
Harumi
2nd
eth0s
Scum:
Italiano
Krazy*