going to be honest,, interest level low right now, skimmed, more or less~
mozamis, enchant, almost is really scummy, in my eyes xD
it's playstyle, unfortunately,, can't make accurate assessment as of yet
waiting to see more, will share thoughts after council, agree with cow
In post 69, Battle Mage wrote:if Mozamis was town, they would think I could potentially be scum.
VOTE: mozamis
You've got this wrong. I was saying that you couldnt possibly know whether T-Bone was town at that point. I wasn't talking about you.
I think it's you who doesn't understand where he's coming from.
Fact:
If
BM is Scum he
would
know T-Bone's alignment already. That's a given.
Fact: You said he couldn't possibly know.
My interpretation: You spoke too fast, hence the "think again" comment
BM's angle: You slipped as BM not knowing T-Bone's alignment necessitates that BM is Town, thus BM thinks you already know he's Town
My comment (which I kept to myself): That's a bit stretching it. Generalizations and short-sighted comments do happen from Town aligned players too. I mean, it's NAI at best. As Scum you would not be slipping if you said that; because Town you would have all the same. In other words, of Town you would say it, Scum you said it trying to mimic Town you, so it's NAI in my book.
My read on you -aside from that- is Town.
End of chapter. Cut. Go to commercials.
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:00 pm
by Almost50
In post 144, Enchant wrote:T-Bone: No Vote
Almost50: No Vote
Enchant: Nono
yessiree: No Vote.
Artemiana: Battle Mage, Mozamis, Raya36
Nono: No Vote
mozamis: No Vote
Battle Mage: Raya36(?)
Raya36: Battle Mage
BM (2), Raya36 (2), Mozamis (1) Nono (1)
Please check, if i'm wrong.
So what's the plan again? Vote 3 that are not me? Fine
In post 163, yessiree wrote:I do agree with Enchant's plan to appoint one council member first, on the simple basis that voting one person is more feasible than voting a three-member combination all at once
as for how the remaining 2 are chosen, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it
Seems a good idea, with obvious caveat that you cannot vote for yourself. HEAL: UNHEAL ALL
Oh!~ So THAT was the plan.
I swear I did read it yesterday, but I totally forgot what it was today, and skimming Enchant's ISO didn't help (apparently I can't read when I'm specifically looking for something rather than reading the whole ISO)
Problem is, if first person we choose for council is scum we could have problems.
Why dont we just do the same plan again for the second and third person on the council?
Well, 2/9 probality to choose mafia.
We using majority for selecting first candidate. If this candidate is mafia, then he would go in Council anyway, even without this plan. Simple because most of players think he is townie enough to become first candidate, so probably he would gain pass in other ways.
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 10:23 pm
by Enchant
T-Bone: Disagree with plan
Almost50: mozamis
Enchant: Nono
yessiree: No Vote.
Artemiana: Battle Mage, Mozamis, Raya36
Nono: Artemiana
mozamis: Almost50
Battle Mage: Raya36(?)
Raya36: Battle Mage
Why does Artemiana get 3 votes when everyone else gets one?
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2021 11:16 pm
by Enchant
Honestly, i didn't knew what to do with that, count only BM or three.
So i got it as "I'm not against these three". You can do that as well, or i can count just BM, at your preference.
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 12:21 am
by Raya36
Even if we do decide a council from this plan we should wait to officially hammer it. That way we have a council ready so we're not at risk of not making one in time but we also have a chance to change it later when our reads are a little stronger
In post 149, T-Bone wrote:I'm generally against plans because it fosters fake cooperation. I'd rather people independently play their best. Yes, it means cooperation is harder, but it also means it is more genuine (and thus less prone to manipulation).
what are your reads so far?
I have 6 posts. You honestly can't find me expressing any reads?
Vote: mozamis
Caught scum.
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 2:16 am
by T-Bone
OH lol he votes me a couple of posts later. Yeah, lock scum I think.
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 2:17 am
by T-Bone
In post 185, Enchant wrote:T-Bone: Disagree with plan
Almost50: mozamis
Enchant: Nono
yessiree: No Vote.
Artemiana: Battle Mage, Mozamis, Raya36
Nono: Artemiana
mozamis: Almost50
Battle Mage: Raya36(?)
Raya36: Battle Mage
Waiting of yessire. Also others can change vote/add more like T-Bone/Artemiana did.
I'll take Raya, Artemiana and Nono for that exercise. I'm townreading Artemiana, and I liked Nono's introduction, calling out an interesting subset of players in 175: Almost, Enchant and Mozzyman. No justification given, but there's certainly been some interaction between Almost and Mozamis, so it's not completely outlandish either. More importantly, scum tend not to shoot wildly into the crowd in broad daylight.
A little suspicious of this council group this is being voted for by exactly its 3 members: Battle Mage, T-Bone, Artemiana
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:34 am
by Raya36
Why are you town reading each other
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:46 am
by T-Bone
Artemiana is part gut read part something I cannot explain. BM is convenience for me. He hasn't done anything scummy (nor have most players at this point). I'm pretty strong on Artemiana, I could take or leave most of the playerlist as my 3rd councilmember.
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:52 am
by Battle Mage
In post 196, Raya36 wrote:A little suspicious of this council group this is being voted for by exactly its 3 members: Battle Mage, T-Bone, Artemiana
Is that suspicious? per the votecount, there is only one player voting for a council which doesn't include themselves. And yet clearly there is a need for consensus to actually select a council. So I suppose that clustering is exactly what I'd expect to happen in this setup.
I legitimately laughed. Your bar for "a very good game" needs to be raised. xD
