Mafiascum.net

In post 175, bugspray wrote:one of the many trials and sibulations of being nonbinary

In post 175, bugspray wrote:sibulations

In post 160, Ivyeo wrote:There has barely been anything AI so far

In post 72, Anya wrote:anyway it says any PT will have daytalk which is an interesting way of putting it

it means wolves could just have no PT and therefore no talk at all and no daytalk

i think cook would just say wolves have daytalk if it were that simple

In post 78, bugspray wrote:

Spoiler: anya don't look

Nobody even very expects really good or nooby noob awesomenes going into very extreme yeetlo or untown posts

In post 95, InsidiousLemons wrote:anya has said some weird shit like, a couple times now

in the one other game i played with her she wasn't so wanton with her accusations and theory crafting right out the gate. she was scum that game. it's early, but i wonder if this might indicate that she feels she has less to lose this game.

68 is a little weird because it kind of implies that even after a year on the site, anya doesn't know there's a standard list of normal roles, but it doesn't feel

that

out of character for her. for the record, the day modifier

is

considered normal on MS, provided the role that it applies to is also considered normal.

52, on the other hand, is just bad. anya is a competent and capable scum player and should be treated as such. i am wary of attempts to disarm like this.

In post 105, choof wrote:everyone else's post history seems boring by comparison, the only solid thing I think I can put forth is that imo dunn and anya aren't scum partners

In post 95, InsidiousLemons wrote:anya has said some weird shit like, a couple times now

in the one other game i played with her she wasn't so wanton with her accusations and theory crafting right out the gate. she was scum that game. it's early, but i wonder if this might indicate that she feels she has less to lose this game.

68 is a little weird because it kind of implies that even after a year on the site, anya doesn't know there's a standard list of normal roles, but it doesn't feel

that

out of character for her. for the record, the day modifier

is

considered normal on MS, provided the role that it applies to is also considered normal.

52, on the other hand, is just bad. anya is a competent and capable scum player and should be treated as such. i am wary of attempts to disarm like this.

In post 127, Umlaut wrote:

In post 99, bugspray wrote:i like how choof and lemons are actually trying to advance the collective town info pool despite how unhelpfuil this RVS has been

I was going to ask if this was on the basis of just 95 and 98 since they were the only gamestate-advancing posts I could see by them but looking back on the thread I guess you're right that that still puts them above average.

I actually disagree with Egix in 108, Lemons' post seems like actually trying to understand and read Anya whereas Choof was just poking at me for something they would have understood already if they read the thread (and did understand a few posts later in 102)

Anya wagon is bad, I offer an alternative:

VOTE: choof

I really dislike 102, partially because they should be

voting

Anya if they suspect her and aren't already voting someone better, but mostly because the "reasons" they're giving for a scummo vibe seem less like things that a person would

actually

expect more from scum and more like things a person would

imagine

being legitimate cause for a scumread.

In post 118, Andante wrote:

In post 75, Anya wrote:

In post 73, Dunnstral wrote:No, that's just a general way of covering roles like neighbor and mason

idk we'll see it's just a feeling

i'll be on the lookout for secret communication though so you better use morse code to escape my introspection

Why does this feel like rolefishing. like, the game has just begun...

In post 186, bugspray wrote:VOTE: umlaut/vote] i absolutely don't understand the levels of logic in that argument agasint choof and it seems like there's stairs missihng and your brain leaped the gap without notigcing

In post 122, Umlaut wrote:

In post 98, choof wrote:

In post 96, Umlaut wrote:Why do people try to theorize in normals without knowing how normals work.

would you like to elaborate or do you not care enough to do anything other than post bitter one liners

I'm happy with the bitter one-liners.

(Actually I don't think Anya's setup speculation was serious but anyone discussing ideas like "maybe there's no scum PT" as if they were serious doesn't know how normals work)

I disagree with 102, btw, Anya's activity and throwing around ridiculous accusations is exactly what I expect from town!Anya in early game (to be fair I have exactly one datum backing this up). And taking 61 seriously is just absurd.

In post 95, InsidiousLemons wrote:for the record, the day modifier is considered normal on MS, provided the role that it ap plies to is also considered normal.

I would be really surprised if this is true. What's your source?

In post 123, Umlaut wrote:

In post 120, Andante wrote:

In post 96, Umlaut wrote:Why do people try to theorize in normals without knowing how normals work.

To be fair, a handful of us just came from a crazy normal game lol, Anya was 1 of 3 mafia doctors in that game, and the entire ending of that game was full of wild theories, and it was a normal game

I'm sorry I missed this one, I love abnormal normals.

In post 189, Anya wrote:was looking for those juicy cranberry reactions i think dunnstral's was slightly town

In post 193, osuka wrote:

In post 122, Umlaut wrote:

In post 98, choof wrote:

In post 96, Umlaut wrote:Why do people try to theorize in normals without knowing how normals work.

would you like to elaborate or do you not care enough to do anything other than post bitter one liners

I'm happy with the bitter one-liners.

(Actually I don't think Anya's setup speculation was serious but anyone discussing ideas like "maybe there's no scum PT" as if they were serious doesn't know how normals work)

I disagree with 102, btw, Anya's activity and throwing around ridiculous accusations is exactly what I expect from town!Anya in early game (to be fair I have exactly one datum backing this up). And taking 61 seriously is just absurd.

In post 95, InsidiousLemons wrote:for the record, the day modifier is considered normal on MS, provided the role that it ap plies to is also considered normal.

I would be really surprised if this is true. What's your source?

welcome to the townbloc, thanks for using your brain

In post 127, Umlaut wrote:

In post 99, bugspray wrote:i like how choof and lemons are actually trying to advance the collective town info pool despite how unhelpfuil this RVS has been

I was going to ask if this was on the basis of just 95 and 98 since they were the only gamestate-advancing posts I could see by them but looking back on the thread I guess you're right that that still puts them above average.

I actually disagree with Egix in 108, Lemons' post seems like actually trying to understand and read Anya whereas Choof was just poking at me for something they would have understood already if they read the thread (and did understand a few posts later in 102)

Anya wagon is bad, I offer an alternative:

VOTE: choof

I really dislike 102, partially because they should be

voting

Anya if they suspect her and aren't already voting someone better, but mostly because the "reasons" they're giving for a scummo vibe seem less like things that a person would

actually

expect more from scum and more like things a person would

imagine

being legitimate cause for a scumread.

In post 128, choof wrote:

In post 122, Umlaut wrote: I disagree with 102, btw, Anya's activity and throwing around ridiculous accusations is exactly what I expect from town!Anya in early game (to be fair I have exactly one datum backing this up).

haven't played with either of you so this may be moot atm, but we also have like a billion hours left in the day for her to spew town

And taking 61 seriously is just absurd.

I'd agree more if 47 didn't exist

In post 95, InsidiousLemons wrote:
Please do not ask people to confirm VT claims... and if people are VT please don't claim VT. thanks.

rhetorical question

In post 126, Andante wrote:Tbh I don't have anything too solid read wise yet from yall I laughed at the "do you say anything but bitter one liners" and yeah. top complaint is, don't out roles. I do not care if that VT claim was serious or not, do not confirm if you were serious... tbh yall have way too much role talk, I'd love to steer away from that if possible

perhaps this is because I don't mentally consider vanilla town to be a role in the same way that a roleblocker etc are considered roles

osuka wrote:choof is being actively trolled and is completely oblivious to it

this is pretty funny

In post 143, Andante wrote:

In post 141, InsidiousLemons wrote:like yeah if the gamestate is stagnant 2 hours from deadline D2 scum probably aren't gonna try and get the ball rolling but there is zero risk straight out of RVS

lmao what? it's d1