Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 5:30 am
Prodding Dew.
Titus is V/LA from 9/17 to 9/20.
Titus is V/LA from 9/17 to 9/20.
Are you happy with greetings "claim"?In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.
lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
How do you feel about it?In post 176, Dew wrote:Are you happy with greetings "claim"?In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.
lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
I don't like how greetings was at e-1 and I don't know how it came to that point so quickly? His claim is hard to read but I don't want to vote him off rn.In post 177, Titus wrote:How do you feel about it?In post 176, Dew wrote:Are you happy with greetings "claim"?In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.
lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
Still voting me for the same reason?In post 77, UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:Mmm. Dew was RVS but I'm keeping the vote on for now.In post 63, Dorsey wrote:Do you have any special connection to Dew? Is that why you're bussing her while targeting me...? I'm just spitballing here.
Is......is your partner someone else?In post 181, Dorsey wrote:And I don't like that RCEnigma is trying to make me scum with AlwaysNever, but the logic he put forth made sense.
Wouldn't expect a claim until intent was given.In post 176, Dew wrote:Are you happy with greetings "claim"?In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.
lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
Yes, haven't seen enough new posts from you to form a proper read, so the vote stays for now.In post 183, Dew wrote:Still voting me for the same reason?In post 77, UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:Mmm. Dew was RVS but I'm keeping the vote on for now.In post 63, Dorsey wrote:Do you have any special connection to Dew? Is that why you're bussing her while targeting me...? I'm just spitballing here.
No offense but it only seems edgier cause you're cutthroat with yer words and shades so I'm just matching your vibes. It rustles my "jimmies" cause I personally don't like that lol, so I'm taking a step back and reassessing things, that's why I clarify that I won't vote youIn post 180, Dorsey wrote:I feel like AlwaysNever's responses to everyone else in Post 137 was nice and placating, but edgier towards me. I don't know why responding to accusations (being "defensive"?) would 'rustle anyone's jimmies', and how can I be a pro anything when this is my second game? It just seems like a lot of extra for a guy I never addressed.
I don't know why GrandpaMo is so hell-bent to make me scum, first because Dew referenced my profile pic and now because Greeting is being opportunistic. And I don't know if Greeting being "petty" and not claiming is anti-town or if it's anti-game. Either way, I don't know what issues he's dealing with.
hmmm good to know, thanks for the explanationIn post 170, RCEnigma wrote:Meant greeting.
If you flip red then your push on grandpa becomes an alignment indicative association. Challenging grandpa on that read implicates one of Dorsey/dew since the intent to downplay the read is to discredit it. Which scum wouldn't have an incentive to if both were town. It makes grandpa town in that hypothetical world. He is as of right now in my Poe as I stated before.
That changes on certain flips being certain alignments so in general preflip associatives are not a good tool to build reads with.
In post 184, RCEnigma wrote:Is......is your partner someone else?In post 181, Dorsey wrote:And I don't like that RCEnigma is trying to make me scum with AlwaysNever, but the logic he put forth made sense.
What's the one Titus scumgame you're familiar with, for starters? I'm curious cause it's like she's somehow... restrained herself in her latest postsIn post 186, RCEnigma wrote:Fwiw Dorsey you're tied for my top town and honestly I will always have an asterisk next to Titus unless mechanically clear just because I know she has the potential to be very sneaky scum. As of right now she isn't playing to the scumgame I'm familiar with.
In post 153, TL The Legend wrote:So thoughts so far:
Greeting's comment is really weird when they're only at e-2, and no one else seems too willing to vote them. Post 143 seems like a classic scum tactic, that being the whole "i'm town, vote me and you'll regret it" thing. Their posts are all weird and I feel like at best, they're bad town.
Dorsey still feels weird to me but idk.
UhUh's posts are all just nonsensical to me. I can't figure out what the hell he's trying to say.
Everyone else seems town-ish, so I'm thinking scum has to be two of these three.
In light of this, I'm changing my vote to VOTE: Greeting
In post 154, TL The Legend wrote:And yes, I'm putting them at e-1. If you wanna hammer them, go ahead; they're more than likely scum anyway.
Oookay let me know when you do thenDorsey wrote:It's moreso I had stuff to say about them but nothing to say about you.
definitely not a call out to me huhDorsey wrote:But yes, we have a playstyle and personality difference. I have to defend a lot because people take pot shots because I post a lot and engage the easiest. It's more convenient for them to address me than to seek out the people who are lurking or who don't offer any opinions of their own.
sureIn post 195, Dorsey wrote:Didn't know I was cutthroat tho
But whyGreeting wrote:I have quite a lot of thoughts with regard attempt to vote me out, but I think I'll keep them to myself for the time being.