Page 8 of 30

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 5:30 am
by Micc
Prodding Dew.
Titus is V/LA from 9/17 to 9/20.


Votecount 1.07
Greeting (2) -
RCEnigma, TL The Legend
TL The Legend (2) -
Dorsey, Titus
Dew (1) -
UhUhWaitAndSee
Dorsey (1) -
Greeting

Not Voting (3) -
AlwaysNever, Dew, GrandpaMo

With 9 players alive it takes 5 votes to eliminate.

The deadline for Day 1 is in (expired on 2021-09-16 19:30:00).

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 6:33 am
by Dew
In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.

lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
Are you happy with greetings "claim"?

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 12:45 pm
by Titus
In post 176, Dew wrote:
In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.

lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
Are you happy with greetings "claim"?
How do you feel about it?

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:34 pm
by Dorsey
Can I get people's opinions on these four players?
- UhUhWaitAndSee
- TL The Legend
- RCEnigma
- Titus

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:34 pm
by Dorsey
And for the players (TL The Legend, Dew) that are saying I'm "weird", can you elaborate? Which posts were weird and what was weird about them?
RE:My "privileged information" remark - that was intentional shade on the people who weren't asking questions and were just going with the flow, and shade on the people who were allowing that but coming for me for asking questions. ('Doing my part' was just stealing a pagetop because apparently that's what I'm supposed to do)

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:35 pm
by Dorsey
I feel like AlwaysNever's responses to everyone else in Post 137 was nice and placating, but edgier towards me. I don't know why responding to accusations (being "defensive"?) would 'rustle anyone's jimmies', and how can I be a pro anything when this is my second game? It just seems like a lot of extra for a guy I never addressed.

I don't know why GrandpaMo is so hell-bent to make me scum, first because Dew referenced my profile pic and now because Greeting is being opportunistic. And I don't know if Greeting being "petty" and not claiming is anti-town or if it's anti-game. Either way, I don't know what issues he's dealing with.

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:35 pm
by Dorsey
And I don't like that RCEnigma is trying to make me scum with AlwaysNever, but the logic he put forth made sense.

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 8:28 pm
by Dew
In post 177, Titus wrote:
In post 176, Dew wrote:
In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.

lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
Are you happy with greetings "claim"?
How do you feel about it?
I don't like how greetings was at e-1 and I don't know how it came to that point so quickly? His claim is hard to read but I don't want to vote him off rn.

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 9:43 pm
by Dew
In post 77, UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:
In post 63, Dorsey wrote:Do you have any special connection to Dew? Is that why you're bussing her while targeting me...? I'm just spitballing here.
Mmm. Dew was RVS but I'm keeping the vote on for now.
Still voting me for the same reason?

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 10:03 pm
by RCEnigma
In post 181, Dorsey wrote:And I don't like that RCEnigma is trying to make me scum with AlwaysNever, but the logic he put forth made sense.
Is......is your partner someone else?

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 10:06 pm
by UhUhWaitAndSee
In post 176, Dew wrote:
In post 160, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: i forgot i never unvoted them/ pivoted my vote off from rvs.

lets not just quick hammer so quick yet. lets wait for a claim / reaction
Are you happy with greetings "claim"?
Wouldn't expect a claim until intent was given.

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 10:09 pm
by RCEnigma
Fwiw Dorsey you're tied for my top town and honestly I will always have an asterisk next to Titus unless mechanically clear just because I know she has the potential to be very sneaky scum. As of right now she isn't playing to the scumgame I'm familiar with.

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 10:10 pm
by UhUhWaitAndSee
In post 183, Dew wrote:
In post 77, UhUhWaitAndSee wrote:
In post 63, Dorsey wrote:Do you have any special connection to Dew? Is that why you're bussing her while targeting me...? I'm just spitballing here.
Mmm. Dew was RVS but I'm keeping the vote on for now.
Still voting me for the same reason?
Yes, haven't seen enough new posts from you to form a proper read, so the vote stays for now.

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 12:29 am
by Dorsey
I'm still waiting to hear Titus's theory from Post 163. Or how she differentiated between TL being a 'wolfy pop on' or 'wolfy bus' (Post 172).

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 12:30 am
by Dorsey
And idk why it would take extensive coaching to have someone not fakeclaim if they've not done it before.

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 1:58 am
by AlwaysNever
In post 180, Dorsey wrote:I feel like AlwaysNever's responses to everyone else in Post 137 was nice and placating, but edgier towards me. I don't know why responding to accusations (being "defensive"?) would 'rustle anyone's jimmies', and how can I be a pro anything when this is my second game? It just seems like a lot of extra for a guy I never addressed.

I don't know why GrandpaMo is so hell-bent to make me scum, first because Dew referenced my profile pic and now because Greeting is being opportunistic. And I don't know if Greeting being "petty" and not claiming is anti-town or if it's anti-game. Either way, I don't know what issues he's dealing with.
No offense but it only seems edgier cause you're cutthroat with yer words and shades so I'm just matching your vibes. It rustles my "jimmies" cause I personally don't like that lol, so I'm taking a step back and reassessing things, that's why I clarify that I won't vote you
I am aware at least that you're a fellow newbs, and by what people have said in RVS, this can be your second game here but you might've played a lot elsewhere, or offline even, I wouldn't know. It's just my assumption, and if it's wrong then I'm wrong
Also I don't really care if you think that's extra, that's who I am. I don't need you to address me for me to call you out. I know, however, that tunneling you might blind me to others who are being sus, so I hope we can cooperate with each other from now on.
Hopefully this doesn't sound extra to you


Also if anything, anyone can easily pile votes on you cause of that, hell I almost did, but I took a step back and realized it's probably just how you do things

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 1:59 am
by AlwaysNever
Also I was waiting for Titus theory before I reply this but it never came, instead Titus is back with the single line posts, what is going on there

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:12 am
by AlwaysNever
also Dorsey I just find it really curious how you say in Post 130 that I'm an absent slot, when Uhuh and Dew at that point were also kinda absent but you didn't call them out :?
If you do flip red Dorsey, I think one of them might be too tbh, plus TL

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:19 am
by Dorsey
It's moreso I had stuff to say about them but nothing to say about you.

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:20 am
by Dorsey
But yes, we have a playstyle and personality difference. I have to defend a lot because people take pot shots because I post a lot and engage the easiest. It's more convenient for them to address me than to seek out the people who are lurking or who don't offer any opinions of their own.

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:23 am
by Dorsey
Didn't know I was cutthroat tho :neutral:

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:46 am
by AlwaysNever
In post 170, RCEnigma wrote:Meant greeting.

If you flip red then your push on grandpa becomes an alignment indicative association. Challenging grandpa on that read implicates one of Dorsey/dew since the intent to downplay the read is to discredit it. Which scum wouldn't have an incentive to if both were town. It makes grandpa town in that hypothetical world. He is as of right now in my Poe as I stated before.

That changes on certain flips being certain alignments so in general preflip associatives are not a good tool to build reads with.
hmmm good to know, thanks for the explanation
In post 184, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 181, Dorsey wrote:And I don't like that RCEnigma is trying to make me scum with AlwaysNever, but the logic he put forth made sense.
Is......is your partner someone else?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
In post 186, RCEnigma wrote:Fwiw Dorsey you're tied for my top town and honestly I will always have an asterisk next to Titus unless mechanically clear just because I know she has the potential to be very sneaky scum. As of right now she isn't playing to the scumgame I'm familiar with.
What's the one Titus scumgame you're familiar with, for starters? I'm curious cause it's like she's somehow... restrained herself in her latest posts

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:55 am
by Greeting
I have quite a lot of thoughts with regard attempt to vote me out, but I think I'll keep them to myself for the time being.

Image

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:58 am
by Greeting
In post 153, TL The Legend wrote:So thoughts so far:
Greeting's comment is really weird when they're only at e-2, and no one else seems too willing to vote them. Post 143 seems like a classic scum tactic, that being the whole "i'm town, vote me and you'll regret it" thing. Their posts are all weird and I feel like at best, they're bad town.
Dorsey still feels weird to me but idk.
UhUh's posts are all just nonsensical to me. I can't figure out what the hell he's trying to say.
Everyone else seems town-ish, so I'm thinking scum has to be two of these three.
In light of this, I'm changing my vote to VOTE: Greeting
In post 154, TL The Legend wrote:And yes, I'm putting them at e-1. If you wanna hammer them, go ahead; they're more than likely scum anyway.


(at least not for the time being)

Would you mind explaining how am I "bad town"?

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2021 2:59 am
by AlwaysNever
Dorsey wrote:It's moreso I had stuff to say about them but nothing to say about you.
Oookay let me know when you do then :lol:
Dorsey wrote:But yes, we have a playstyle and personality difference. I have to defend a lot because people take pot shots because I post a lot and engage the easiest. It's more convenient for them to address me than to seek out the people who are lurking or who don't offer any opinions of their own.
:shifty: definitely not a call out to me huh
In post 195, Dorsey wrote:Didn't know I was cutthroat tho :neutral:
:igmeou: sure
Greeting wrote:I have quite a lot of thoughts with regard attempt to vote me out, but I think I'll keep them to myself for the time being.

Image
But why
I wanna know