Mafiascum.net

First was Donner Party, then I let it slip in 2181 but for some reason you thought I was talking about bork

it's shocking how little I understand what is going on around me

god these reactions own

it's okay peta you only ruined 8 years of your own work it's not like you fucked up that bad LMAO

I'm just saying I've never seen mith and petapan in a game together

mith is such a nice guy tho i guess i did think that of catboiiii as well ~.~

here is the late Saber's game over:




did not get around to making unwnd's in time!

(also, welcome Saber!)

hai saber

In post 162, Prism wrote:I thought peta being aggressive and callously pugnacious was within bounds but causing two replaceouts with it. Oof.

I'm not playing a game with him again.

its kind of the goal of the mafia to destroy the town

its not a tea party

Sorry man. I'm too old to take that stuff and I'm even too older to debate it.

you need to learn to fight back over the top when someone does that shit to you

In post 180, Morning Tweet wrote:here is the late Saber's game over:

Game Over!

---

SABER

Died by the Blade

[/font]

did not get around to making unwnd's in time!

This one's awesome

...Are people going to forget to cast votes?

none forgot! One player intentionally delayed their vote until 1 minute before deadline, however

Now this one..... will it work as I intended, who knows!

Definitely one that I'm excited to see how it's managed though

If towniest -> scummiest, then scum gets to kill any of the towniest players they want for free. Certainly a strategy, but not the best!

If you send the middling townies first, scum has to start sweating. With the right picks, scum will have their hand forced into killing a middle-of-the-pack player. This is the optimal outcome, in theory

If scummiest -> towniest..... I'm not really sure why you'd want to do that.

In post 4309, Ydrasse wrote:

In post 4306, Dwlee99 wrote:er wait, scum could just kill the first person going through

So we actually want to send the bottom four of the pool of 8 we want through first

UNVOTE:

i... think this is right? maybe?

im unsure honestly

ding ding ding ding ding!

welcome Infy! <3

The idea for this one was "How can I force the players to have to strike a balance between sending players they believe to be town, but not so obvious town that it'd be a disaster to lose them?"

In other words, can I make the players scumhunt in the middle of the pack

Additionally this game gives scum a rare chance at a nightkill. Scum has *some* nightkills even though this is nightless because nightless is pain. But the catch for them is that town can influence the kill with good nominations.

Also this is the game that culls the players who don't want to play / LHF / scum etc and puts the game in a good spot for the more competitive bits that finish it out

In post 189, Morning Tweet wrote:none forgot! One player intentionally delayed their vote until 1 minute before deadline, however

lol didn't i not submit?

wait huh

Nah you were the third quickest

In post 192, Morning Tweet wrote:If towniest -> scummiest, then scum gets to kill any of the towniest players they want for free. Certainly a strategy, but not the best!

If you send the middling townies first, scum has to start sweating. With the right picks, scum will have their hand forced into killing a middle-of-the-pack player. This is the optimal outcome, in theory

If scummiest -> towniest..... I'm not really sure why you'd want to do that.

sure but how often are scum in those middle of the pack players

i might just send the towniest anyway