Mafiascum.net

eye c wut u deed thrr

I don't think this style of accusations is worthwhile...

that doesn't work nearly as well when it is on a separate page. :/

The counter wagon always gets them, though it wasn't a real wagon in this case.

Are you saying you agree with shaft.ed's vote?

Also are you aware that you are in fire and ice mafia?

I'm hovering between Twomz and Alabaska. I await their upcoming posts with great anticipation.

Cyberbob wrote:I'm hovering between Twomz and Alabaska. I await their upcoming posts with great anticipation.

FoS: Twomz and Alabaska J

Simul'd look at the one above.

I am eagerly awaiting armlx's reply.

I saw that post, but it didn't do anything for me either way.

Cyberbob wrote:I saw that post, but it didn't do anything for me either way.

What do you want me to reply to, then?

Are you saying you agree with shaft.ed's vote?

No, but its not scummy.

Also are you aware that you are in fire and ice mafia?

The watched topic page crashed when I first clicked, didn't go on the list.

Why you thought shaft.ed's vote was scummy enough to deserve yours, for one thing.

Apart from that, nothing in particular. I suppose I would've been better served with an IGMEOY than an FoS, come to think of it.

Cyberbob wrote:Why you thought shaft.ed's vote was scummy enough to deserve yours, for one thing.

Apart from that, nothing in particular. I suppose I would've been better served with an IGMEOY than an FoS, come to think of it.

It seemed so thin. Not voteworthy at all. It struck me as so odd, that I thought it deserved my vote.

It seemed so thin. Not voteworthy at all. It struck me as so odd, that I thought it deserved my vote.

I agree with this to some extent, I'm not sure it's vote worthy on its own but shaft.ed's vote does seem extremely weak.

I was actually hoping the quote chain would catch on and everyone would hop on .

Twomz wrote:I was actually hoping the quote chain would catch on and everyone would hop on .

Shame on you for thinking we're a logical group.

That was funny as hell.

Pug89 wrote:

It seemed so thin. Not voteworthy at all. It struck me as so odd, that I thought it deserved my vote.

I agree with this to some extent, I'm not sure it's vote worthy on its own but shaft.ed's vote does seem extremely weak.

It was an extremely weak vote. There isn't really much going on and I wanted to move things away from role action discussion. It worked to some extent. And Bob's reaction was not bad. I don't really see Alabaska's vote as much weaker than mine. Twomz being silly I have to meta.

And now that I said we need to move things away from set up discussion...we need to decide on action claiming (or not claiming) TODAY.

I think popcorn dice is the ideal solution to this, but I think a full claim of all members of the town is certainly in the towns best interest however it occurs.

shaft.ed wrote:I think popcorn dice is the ideal solution to this,

but I think a full claim of all members of the town is certainly in the towns best interest however it occurs.

Waaaaiit. Do you mean claiming before or after the fact?

Cyberbob wrote:

shaft.ed wrote:I think popcorn dice is the ideal solution to this,

but I think a full claim of all members of the town is certainly in the towns best interest however it occurs.

Waaaaiit. Do you mean claiming before or after the fact?

I mean tommorow. I think we all need to claim exactly what we did tommorow. But we need to decide today how that will be resolved.

Oh, that's alright then. I wasn't sure whether you were advocating claiming our actions today or tomorrow - if it had been today that would have been an entirely different kettle of fish.

Cyberbob wrote:Oh, that's alright then. I wasn't sure whether you were advocating claiming our actions today or tomorrow - if it had been today that would have been an entirely different kettle of fish.

For sure. And you aren't even supposed to put fish in a kettle.

Depends, do we want to test to see if the investigative role(s) (me and maybe the hunter) are telling the truth or if the people who have other activities are telling the truth.

Basically, does the tracker, watcher, king, ect claim first or last?

Other than that and knowing who the jailkeeper targeted, is there anything else that is important to be told first? Or that should be held until after everyone else has gone?

Twomz wrote:Depends, do we want to test to see if the investigative role(s) (me and maybe the hunter) are telling the truth or if the people who have other activities are telling the truth.

Basically, does the tracker, watcher, king, ect claim first or last?

Other than that and knowing who the jailkeeper targeted, is there anything else that is important to be told first? Or that should be held until after everyone else has gone?

From my experience in Heroes Smalltown, it's not the best of ideas to allow the watchers/trackers etc. to go last. If they are scum it's very difficult to lie about their target. If they know they're claiming last then it's easy to fabricate, if they know they're going first then someone else in the scum group can perform the kill. I wholeheartedly believe a randomized method is ideal.

Whatever we decide upon (for the record I think a randomised order would be best), let's get it over with quickly so we can set about getting back to scumhunting.

shaft.ed wrote:

Twomz wrote:Depends, do we want to test to see if the investigative role(s) (me and maybe the hunter) are telling the truth or if the people who have other activities are telling the truth.

Basically, does the tracker, watcher, king, ect claim first or last?

Other than that and knowing who the jailkeeper targeted, is there anything else that is important to be told first? Or that should be held until after everyone else has gone?

From my experience in Heroes Smalltown, it's not the best of ideas to allow the watchers/trackers etc. to go last. If they are scum it's very difficult to lie about their target. If they know they're claiming last then it's easy to fabricate, if they know they're going first then someone else in the scum group can perform the kill. I wholeheartedly believe a randomized method is ideal.

If the watcher were scum this would be true, so I suppose it would be best to not worry about it until I'm confirmed... but I look at it more as I can use my watching to catch other players in lies... which won't happen if I go first.