Mafiascum.net

In post 10, Prism wrote:Shockingly that is actually +town for Enchant because he's not reading the fake PM as scum lmao

In post 27, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 25, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 20, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 19, fireisredsir wrote:do not fret, i shall solve the game!!

you're already on the shitlist, pal.

why, for taking this pagetop?

ok, now you're openwolfing.

In post 44, Shuichi Saihara wrote:Not saying anything new here, but I think the only way to play ascetic that would benefit the forces of despair would be hiding it. As it is, Prism has a strong reputation so I'm sure they're aware of the meta-prescribed move. So I don't view it as indicative of anything.

In post 165, skitter30 wrote:

In post 161, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 151, skitter30 wrote:Ok does that not apply to the like 5 other people in the game who did not have reads yet?

Also i think ceph can fake not hating the game for a whole 50 posts

Also i think vpb is somewhat scummy as well

Who else was active lurking give names

I didnt say active lurking, i said 'wasnt solving' at that point. I disnt go back and check but i dont think any of ceph/prism/vpb maybe enchant had reads at that point ...

They're giving thoughts on the game. Enchant less so but enchant is enchant

Where I'm at right now on a sort of gut level I think is, the role might make Prism scum, need more data, but there's no way I'm going to lim on just that as another explanation may present itself in the future. I confess to being mechphobic. But I should put on my Trying Hat later and go over it again.

So anyway, with 99% probality we will have around 3-4 people claimed at day end.

Like, most people could atleast senseble to think about usage of ability, and Ari like "Uh you know my role useless so i claim it, so more useful PR get shot instead me".

Where did we go wrong?

They're saying you wouldn't speculate on their partner this early cause doing so before bit you in the butt

In post 171, Aristeia wrote:

In post 167, Prism wrote:It feels performative, but on more thought I think there's a deeper issue: You previously got hardpunished for speculating on my partner instead of going one at a time. You don't make that mistake again.

I don't understand, can you elaborate?

Mini Normal 2226. One game afterwards you made it a point to say you hadn't read it or paid attention. Another game you made it clear you had thought more about it.

In post 178, Dwlee99 wrote:They're saying you wouldn't speculate on their partner this early cause doing so before bit you in the butt

because I shoved that "partner" and killed the "partner"

I am not shoving skitter here or voting for her

so what mistake is she even accusing me of making.

I am team Ari in this dispute.

In post 175, Dwlee99 wrote:They're giving thoughts on the game. Enchant less so but enchant is enchant

Meh fair enuf

I dont have issues with fire not having content by post 50 tho

Anyways i want to do this now

VOTE: vpb

Oh that timing tho

You're dedicating significant time to me/skitter speculation and being sure to hit all the known tonal meta points along the way.

I find it very hard to believe the distinction in 180 is expected of me and in good faith.

I wrote one post about you/skitter

In post 182, skitter30 wrote:
I dont have issues with fire not having content by post 50 tho

It's not damning but it's something to go off of that early

I sleep.

Fair enuf. Night enchant!

In post 183, fireisredsir wrote:VOTE: dwlee

Why

@skitter what about their answers satisfied you?

In post 186, Aristeia wrote:I wrote one post about you/skitter

Two, and in the second you made it clear that you were very concerned about losing to a scumteam of us specifically.

In post 185, Prism wrote:I find it very hard to believe the distinction in 180 is expected of me and in good faith.

?

You're accusing me of being scum because town!me doesn't make "the same mistake"

I don't understand what mistake you are even talking about.

If it's about shoving Meg instead of you on partner spec in that mini - I'm not voting or pushing skitter so how is that even relevant?

In post 192, Prism wrote:

In post 186, Aristeia wrote:I wrote one post about you/skitter

Two, and in the second you made it clear that you were very concerned about losing to a scumteam of us specifically.

two consecutive posts is not significant time.

In post 190, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 183, fireisredsir wrote:VOTE: dwlee

Why

for using 27 as your example of vp giving thoughts on the game, mostly

I'm not sure 'satisfied' is the right word, more a combo of:
Their thouhht could be plausible and i'm feeling a bit worse abt vpb now

~

I dont really have thoughts on this ari/prism thing, i think they can plausibly be tvt

Should town!me not be concerned about losing to a scum team of You/Skitter?

Do you think I think you're bad at mafia or something?

I think your approach to me is wildly off from what I would expect.

You're being extremely pedantic, and you absolutely would be eager to headhunt me after our last two games together.

197 has to be a fucking joke if you're town