Mafiascum.net

Ser Panda (4): BloodCovenent, BloodCovenent, guille2015, StrangerCoug
Knight of Cydonia (3): Sir Bastion, Ser Panda, Ser Panda
Nocmen (2): WrathChild, AurorusVox
DoomYoshi (2): Knight of Cydonia, BloodCovenent
GreyICE (2): Axelrod, Knight of Cydonia
guille2015 (1): GreyICE

votes are currently not on a player.



Every player has votes.
With alive, it's to hammer.
There are votes in play, of which are frozen, leaving votes active.

Deadline is October 4th, 11 p.m. CEST.

↑ BloodCovenent wrote:
I accused him of scum based on my priest ability that tracked whether or not he had taken part in killing someone during nights 1,2, or 3. I received a guilty from the mod. The mod does not indicate which night. Because SC did not die, i felt the need to claim and that Panda was guilty. I also misinterpreted the role by that assumption.

But to answer your question.

I do have evidence that Panda did what i am accusing him of.

However it is slightly tainted.
I chose to investigate Ser Panda because i found him to be pretty scummy in my read through. He was even the one to suggest that Scum had three 1-shot abilities.

Just sayin'.

Actually

the whole day 2 with him being executioner and that overturn makes more sense that he's town.

I'm kind of stumped now.

↑ Knight of Cydonia wrote:

↑ BloodCovenent wrote:
I accused him of scum based on my priest ability that tracked whether or not he had taken part in killing someone during nights 1,2, or 3. I received a guilty from the mod. The mod does not indicate which night. Because SC did not die, i felt the need to claim and that Panda was guilty. I also misinterpreted the role by that assumption.

But to answer your question.

I do have evidence that Panda did what i am accusing him of.

However it is slightly tainted.
I chose to investigate Ser Panda because i found him to be pretty scummy in my read through. He was even the one to suggest that Scum had three 1-shot abilities.

Just sayin'.

Are you not reading?

He says he investigated me and said that I had blood on my hands.
He says People on the jury who vote to convict will have blood on their hands.
but since strangercoug didn't die, it didn't count.
I told him to go ask the mod because there was no fucking way his info was legit unless it did count.
and he asked the mod and found out it did count.

And yet, he's still double voting you. So either he's a conveniently made-up scum role who is just barrelling on ahead, a townie who legitimately believes he's still found the scum with his role, or an idiot.
...hang on.
Why would a jury member have blood on their hands? It's not like you're literally going out and clubbing Coug in the head... I can understand that from the Executioner, but not the jury members... I dunno.

metaphorical blood on their hands I would assume.

And he's double voting me not because of role info. I'm pretty sure of that and he's said as much.

↑ AurorusVox wrote:

Unvote: StrangerCoug

Vote: Quilford

Vote: BloodC-

Unvote: DoomYoshi

Vote: Nocmen

Now it's time.
NOW it's time.

Wait, what?

↑ AurorusVox wrote:Sc wagon didn't need my vote as support to reach full lynch. The others do.

how about doom?

Axel sold me on Quilford.

I also second greyice's WTF @ Guille being a town read by Sir Bastion.

Damnit, Quil's been hammered already.

↑ Quilford wrote:

↑ BloodCovenent wrote:

↑ Quilford wrote:Also your claim while town is wrong, Ser Panda is not scum. You have interpreted it wrongly.

Tell me how it's wrong? He was not on Jury duty nights 1 or 2. Night 3 he voted SC. SC did not die. Therefore Ser Panda killed someone at night.

I think if the scum do in fact have the power to override the Judge / Jury / Executioner, it's far more likely that they're limited to substituting in a different Defender but retaining the original Guilty / Not Guilty decision. It would be too OP otherwise. You were stupid enough to out today before checking someone else on last night's jury to see whether your theory was absolute crap, which I must say I think it is.

I'm much more preferring Blood's explanation so far. Additionally, my town read on Panda was kind of shattered when MoS was revealed to be judge, as I felt some of his posts hinted towards him being the judge.


Damnit Blood.

I'll still keep my vote on Ser because well...may as well spread them on to wagons I'm believing now.




Gooner's interactions with MoS pointed out by Ser make perfect sense to me. Which makes those two double voting Blood horrible.

↑ Ser Panda wrote:He investigated me knowing he would get a guilty no matter what.

Uhh... No, he did not, unless he knew who the jury was going to be in advance. You're back into "throwing crap to see what sticks" mode.

↑ BloodCovenent wrote:

↑ Ser Panda wrote:Blood

The thing I'm facepalming about is you investigating me when you know I'm in the jury with you.

↑ IceGuy wrote:The Jury is made of random players who get a QT and can sentence the defendant to death with a simple majority, otherwise he is acquitted.

Defendants, Judge and Executioner are not called up for jury duty.

I sent that PM in before we convicted SC. I kind of facepalm'd myself too halfway through the night too, however you still received a guilty

.

Hello strangercoug

↑ StrangerCoug wrote:

↑ Ser Panda wrote:He investigated me knowing he would get a guilty no matter what.

Uhh... No, he did not, unless he knew who the jury was going to be in advance. You're back into "throwing crap to see what sticks" mode.

Look at how badly this scumbag wants me lynched.

for now.
I don't think he has what he thinks he has, but the important thing is that he thinks he has it.



Nocmen, since we now have a new judge, you can go hang and get executed good and proper. I never stopped thinking you were scum, I just stopped thinking you were worth sending to a judge who was going to pardon you anyway.

↑ Ser Panda wrote:

↑ BloodCovenent wrote:

↑ Ser Panda wrote:Blood

The thing I'm facepalming about is you investigating me when you know I'm in the jury with you.

↑ IceGuy wrote:The Jury is made of random players who get a QT and can sentence the defendant to death with a simple majority, otherwise he is acquitted.

Defendants, Judge and Executioner are not called up for jury duty.

I sent that PM in before we convicted SC. I kind of facepalm'd myself too halfway through the night too, however you still received a guilty

.

Hello strangercoug

↑ BloodCovenent wrote:Also, my night action was sent in before deliberation phase 3. I believe it had to be in before that.

Hello, Ser Panda. Knowing who's not in the jury is not the same thing as knowing who is.

↑ Ser Panda wrote:

↑ StrangerCoug wrote:

↑ Ser Panda wrote:He investigated me knowing he would get a guilty no matter what.

Uhh... No, he did not, unless he knew who the jury was going to be in advance. You're back into "throwing crap to see what sticks" mode.

Look at how badly this scumbag wants me lynched.

Look how badly you're panicking.

I missed that and he worded it weirdly.

Look at the scumbag baiting me now.

And the scumbag also doesn't deny he's a scumbag.

Because it is an exercise in futility. All I can do is continue to scumhunt and hope the rest of the town looks at my reads.

I also think it's a really good idea that we send Nocmen back up as a Defendant considering he was freed Night 1.

VOTE: Nocmen

↑ Quilford wrote:I also think it's a really good idea that we send Nocmen back up as a Defendant considering he was freed Night 1.

VOTE: Nocmen

By that logic, why should we be sorry we hammered you?

↑ Ser Panda wrote:GreyIce also seems to have 4 votes on the board.

needs fixing mod

you wound me Greyice.

You promised to sheep me in the jury qt.

Guile is a town read of mine.

What are your reads on wrathchild and sir bastion?

Wraithchild is probably town if KoC is town. I don't see scum flying in and going apeshit over KoC being made executioner while knowing he's town. The only exception would be if he realized how fucking hard it is to actually lynch scum in this fucking setup (if there's more than 3 scum, I'm calling serious shenanigans, maaaaayyyyyybbbbbeeeee 4).

Again, why is Guile town? He doesn't do shit, at all, ever. He just sits there and commentates terribly. And it's TERRIBLE.

Ser Bastion can be scum for post #20 with MoS dead.

Actually







I'm okay with this.

↑ StrangerCoug wrote:

↑ Quilford wrote:I also think it's a really good idea that we send Nocmen back up as a Defendant considering he was freed Night 1.

VOTE: Nocmen

By that logic, why should we be sorry we hammered you?

Because I'm town? I shouldn't have been hammered in the first place, lol.

I actually asked to die in my defence statement. In my opinion, the town has nothing to gain by ever deciding a defendant is Not Guilty (unless their defence statement shows that they're town). We send people up as defendants because we think they're mafia. Every town player who has to decide the fate of a defendant during the Deliberation Phase should respect the opinions of the collective town, and vote their charge Guilty.

Plus I knew surviving the Night would just see me hammered again the following day.

Also Nocmen is just obviously scum.

↑ GreyICE wrote:

↑ Ser Panda wrote:GreyIce also seems to have 4 votes on the board.

needs fixing mod

you wound me Greyice.

You promised to sheep me in the jury qt.

Guile is a town read of mine.

What are your reads on wrathchild and sir bastion?

Wraithchild is probably town if KoC is town. I don't see scum flying in and going apeshit over KoC being made executioner while knowing he's town. The only exception would be if he realized how fucking hard it is to actually lynch scum in this fucking setup (if there's more than 3 scum, I'm calling serious shenanigans, maaaaayyyyyybbbbbeeeee 4).

Again, why is Guile town? He doesn't do shit, at all, ever. He just sits there and commentates terribly. And it's TERRIBLE.

Ser Bastion can be scum for post #20 with MoS dead.

↑ GreyICE wrote:Actually

Unvote All

Vote: Ser Panda

Vote: Ser Panda

Vote: Ser Panda

I'm okay with this.

I... am not quite sure what is going on here. Care to explain?

Unless I'm mistaken, it looks like greyICE just attempted to quickhammer Ser Panda. If we were allowed to have 3 votes on someone then Ser panda would have 8 votes right now and would have been lynched.

However, the max votes you can place on another player is 2 so that didnt happen. But the point is that it is clear that greyICE just attempted a quickhammer to end the day early.


Let blood check someone else tonight and see what happens. We can sort all of that crap out tomorrow.

Don't you wish you'd actually read the rules now? Literally no pro-town motives to ending the day early over 2 weeks early like you just attempted.