Page 71 of 93

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:00 am
by Selkies
Does that mean you'll stop posting in the thread?

Really and truly?


Jennifer is the only person left to claim so we'll have her do that.

Majiffy, how are you reading the nature of Rach's VT claim?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:02 am
by Majiffy
I didn't even notice Rach posted yet today. Hold on.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:03 am
by Majiffy
Oh right she's the one who brought up MYLO originally.

I'm not seeing a VT claim anywhere in this day phase from her.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:04 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 1749, ArcAngel9 wrote:Explain why do you think you're targeted last night.. you should give us more details to resolve this.
cause I am obvious town and a threat to mafia

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:05 am
by Selkies
She did squat today. I was referring to her premature claim on...day 1?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:06 am
by Selkies
In post 690, RachMarie wrote:Ok giuys n gals

After staying up ALL night so I could make my very early ENT appointment, having yogurt after, and then riding the bus home, I took a few hours nap. In that time ya all posted again.

Let me clarify...

When I said posting more, I meant in relation to everyone else. I feel like there is so much noise and a total imbalance in this game due to some peeps being so hyperactive at posting.

@ Jen yeah that whole taking several times to get a post through has happened to me too a number of times.
Pbpa analysis?? ok why? I find that usually is scummy. Easy to make yourself look like you are trying to post content without actually posting content. It is one of the things I look for from LS when he is in a game with me cause that is how I usually nail him as scum.

I did however manage to stalk one game of Sven's so far.

I notice that the hyper aggressive hyper posting style is also in that game as well... Am I a stand in for MM in this game for you Sven? I will get ya all the link.

At least I am not a PR this time

Claim I am a VT.

Even if ya all lynch me Town still can win this game,

All I ask is give me a bit more time to sort out my reads and give them to you. Thanks

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:06 am
by Majiffy
In post 1747, Selkies wrote:Svenskt obviously had severe misgivings about our PGO claim from the minute he read it during twilight night 1. However, his town read on us recovered from it.

That was pretty much my own reaction to the case you built on him on day 2 after I let it soak. "yeah, yeah, but I really trust my towndar this time."
1) You mean where he tried to get you lynched, realized there was no support, and then renegged on his 'read'? Yeah. That wasn't a town process, mate.
2) :facepalm:
In post 1747, Selkies wrote: When he claimed 1 shot BP it all fell together - why our role claim freaked him out the way it did.
Why would a BP ever be freaked out by a PGO? They don't interact.
In post 1748, Selkies wrote:Replace out looks town

Play makes sense for a 1 shot BP. Hard claim a PR during twilight, draw the NK. Sven's outburst looked townie and so does his subsequent claim.
1) Also could fit scum realizing that an aggressive, persuasive player is on their tail.
2) Also WIFOM. Derp. Jake isn't too dumb to pull off a play like that.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:07 am
by Majiffy
In post 1754, Selkies wrote:She did squat today. I was referring to her premature claim on...day 1?
Yeah that was fucking stupid. Nothing really inherently townie or scummy about it, though.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:07 am
by Jake from State Farm
see majiffy is acting like he didn't even know rach claimed despite calling her out on it ROFL

he's scum. lynch him now

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:08 am
by Selkies
Where did svenskt try to get us lynched?

AA9 put a vote on us day 2 and then moved it to Rach iirc.

- f

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:08 am
by Majiffy
I.E. I've seen her do that before as both alignments.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:09 am
by Majiffy
In post 1758, Jake from State Farm wrote:see majiffy is acting like he didn't even know rach claimed despite calling her out on it ROFL
Yes because 1100 posts and 10 ongoing games couldn't possibly be a factor in remembering a minute detail.
In post 1759, Selkies wrote:Where did svenskt try to get us lynched?
Start of D2. Lots of testing the water and pushing by questioning your claim heavily. Didn't you read my case?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:11 am
by Selkies
1) You mean where he tried to get you lynched, realized there was no support, and then renegged on his 'read'? Yeah. That wasn't a town process, mate.
Isn't this like EXACTLY what you did

And Sven never tried to get us lynched. This is evident from the lack of a vote on us.

BP would get freaked out by a PGO because two of them in one game makes very little sense

Then why wouldn't all scum replace out before we lynch them? I was still sheeping fery at the time and so our hydra would never have pushed for a Sven lynch

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:13 am
by Majiffy
In post 1762, Selkies wrote:
1) You mean where he tried to get you lynched, realized there was no support, and then renegged on his 'read'? Yeah. That wasn't a town process, mate.
Isn't this like EXACTLY what you did

And Sven never tried to get us lynched. This is evident from the lack of a vote on us.
1) No?
2) A vote isn't always necessary in trying to get a player lynched. Particularly if you're trying not to look scummy pushing on the only claimed PR in the game.
In post 1762, Selkies wrote:BP would get freaked out by a PGO because two of them in one game makes very little sense

Then why wouldn't all scum replace out before we lynch them? I was still sheeping fery at the time and so our hydra would never have pushed for a Sven lynch
1) Why?
2) That question doesn't really logically follow. One occurrence doesn't make a rule, and the lack of said rule does not mean said occurrence cannot occur.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:14 am
by Selkies
In post 1761, Majiffy wrote:
In post 1758, Jake from State Farm wrote:see majiffy is acting like he didn't even know rach claimed despite calling her out on it ROFL
Yes because 1100 posts and 10 ongoing games couldn't possibly be a factor in remembering a minute detail.
In post 1759, Selkies wrote:Where did svenskt try to get us lynched?
Start of D2. Lots of testing the water and pushing by questioning your claim heavily. Didn't you read my case?
That behavior fits my scenario as well. IIRC I explained why your case wasn't convincing to me during the time between when Svenskt replaced out and Jake replaced in.

I am not sure why it is that I wind up defending at least one player who wants me lynched. It's sort of annoying, though.

- f

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:15 am
by Selkies
The one player in this instance being Jake. I don't even know his game. First time we've played together. But, he's inherited a hell of a town read. :/

- f

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:16 am
by Selkies
1763 is important

But I'm going to sleep for now

Have fun fery

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:16 am
by Majiffy
In post 1764, Selkies wrote:That behavior fits my scenario as well. IIRC I explained why your case wasn't convincing to me during the time between when Svenskt replaced out and Jake replaced in.
And IIRC I didn't find your explanation very convincing. :igmeou:

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:19 am
by Selkies
In post 1767, Majiffy wrote:
In post 1764, Selkies wrote:That behavior fits my scenario as well. IIRC I explained why your case wasn't convincing to me during the time between when Svenskt replaced out and Jake replaced in.
And IIRC I didn't find your explanation very convincing. :igmeou:
So, we're at a standstill re Jake.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:24 am
by Majiffy
Yes.

Also his claim doesn't make sense.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:28 am
by Selkies
In post 1769, Majiffy wrote:Yes.

Also his claim doesn't make sense.
plz explain what doesn't make sense about it.

- f

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:29 am
by Majiffy
Because AA9's makes sense, your claim would be suicidal if scum, which leaves us with an IC, BG, and BP if his claim is legit.

That's incredibly powerful for a Micro.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:30 am
by Majiffy
Not to mention I still don't agree that any of Sven's play fits a bulletproof.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:33 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 1771, Majiffy wrote:Because AA9's makes sense, your claim would be suicidal if scum, which leaves us with an IC, BG, and BP if his claim is legit.

That's incredibly powerful for a Micro.
Obvious AA9 is probably lying but is Majiffy doing the biggest no no in mafia? Setup spec? U scum

Majiffy town would not do noob setup spec.

Scum Sven would not claim 1 shot BP like that and replace out.

We are power lynching jiffy now. He's done slipped twice now.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:34 am
by Majiffy
^ And then we have Jake the obvscum here. How you're reading that slot town is beyond me, Selkies.