Mafiascum.net

In post 1625, AngryPidgeon wrote:

In post 1619, Wisdom wrote:AP I don't know how the fuck you see the slightest town motivation in qwints, please sit down and reread.

How about him being open about everything and his attitude basically being that he has nothing to hide?

Oh, how I wish you were talking about me here

In post 1638, Wisdom wrote:Anyway I don't know why I'm arguing this with you.

A very nice summary of everything.

In post 1673, AngryPidgeon wrote:Grimgroove is scum. I really don't even need to explain that fact to anyone.

Why the fuck would you not need to explain that?
I advise you to explain it before you lynch me, because afterwards you'll feel like too much of an idiot to actually explain it, which will make you seem scummy as a result.
Explain it now, for your own sake.

In post 1675, Amrun wrote:Nooo, ap, i wanna lynch qwintz

Why oh why would that be

In post 1677, Wisdom wrote:Nope AP, we're lynching qwints today.

NEIN!

The only reason you removed your scumread from Amrun is that god-awful analysis of hers with regards to the NS-wagon.
That is it.
You are either in the same boat with her, trying to pull the same shit you did when giving her that easy townread over her involvement in the Venmar reaction-test (= NOTHING).
Or you're being rash and impulsive again.

Lynch Amrun Wisdom. Look into your heart.

In post 1683, qwints wrote:

In post 1590, Amrun wrote: I didn't avoid the NS wagon. I actually started it, though eventually unvoted in order to vote for AP.

This is a lie. Amrun never voted for NS.

Juicy!

In post 1748, Grimgroove wrote:we've been giving a free-pass to both Majiffy (his challenge) and AngryPidgeon (his real-life anecdotes) a bit too easily.

But not mollie?

Holy fuck people. Grim is scum, and so is mollie most likely, and they both DONT make any sense as scum with Amrun.

And how can anyone think that the Safety slot became better? qwints is fucking obvscum.

Mollie is town, her posts are of such a genuinity (guinineness?) that they cannot be faked. It is impossible to do.

The problem with Majiffy for me is that he's impossible to read, even when succesful lynches occur. His forceful character makes him as difficult to read as Nobody Special's silent one.

Now that you're here, explain why your townread on Amrun is more than what I made it out to be, and tell me why Amrun is not an option for a lynch anymore?

In post 1757, Wisdom wrote:Holy fuck people. Grim is scum,

Please elaborate.

Seriously I don't get how anyone doesn't see this.
He does not have a read on 3 people after 65 pages.
I ask him why and he says this:

In post 1589, qwints wrote:@Wisdom, I'm conflicted on two and null on the thrird.

I've got a legal pad filled with red and black for you and venmar

, and somehow read the game without making any notes on enomis.

I instantly smell bullshit and ask him to out all those "notes", and all he gives us is this:

In post 1601, qwints wrote:[red]Venmar - slip after Amrun's townslip. x2. Venmar idiocy.[/red]
[black]Venmar challenged scum. Venmar's goading of Wisdom[/black]

[black] Wisdom ---> Grimm. Wisdom's early town clearing[/black]
[red]Grim--->SC Wisdom/Grimm 770]; SC's 410 ------> inconsistency Wisdom b/w majiffy and mollie[/red]

which doesn't even make any sense as was explained afterwards.

Why don't people see this is bullshit?

In post 1758, Grimgroove wrote:Mollie is town, her posts are of such a genuinity (guinineness?) that they cannot be faked. It is impossible to do.

yeah no. Go read some of her games before saying such crap.

He read 60 pages in a time-span of two hours.

Wisdom, can you honestly say, with the hand on your heart, that you have not spouted bullshit at any point during this game?

PS: I wouldn't be surprised that qwints is also scum. But I'm not lynching him today. Amrun is far more important, if only for my self-preservation.



Given how several people scumread me, it should be acceptable to consensus. I think pitting us against each other could clarify a lot of leanings, certainly after flips.

But in a way we already are pitted against each other. I want her lynched. LYNCHED. With lots of fire.

In post 1761, Wisdom wrote:

In post 1758, Grimgroove wrote:Mollie is town, her posts are of such a genuinity (guinineness?) that they cannot be faked. It is impossible to do.

yeah no. Go read some of her games before saying such crap.

As if this game alone isn't giving me enough to read

Yeah, no, i'm not going to do that.

You'll have to accept my gut on that.

Gut means "good" in German.

Good gut!
Gute Gott.

Grimgroove wrote: If Amrun is still there the next daystage, I will challenge her myself.

Good. We lynch the obvscum today, then you do that.

In post 1764, Wisdom wrote:

Grimgroove wrote: If Amrun is still there the next daystage, I will challenge her myself.

Good. We lynch the obvscum today, then you do that.

She must die today though.

In post 1763, Grimgroove wrote:You'll have to accept my gut on that.

I don't care about your gut. mollie is probably scum for all the reasons I said. If you cannot give us reasons for mollie-town other than saying false things about her making "genuine" posts (when they are not even genuine and even if they were, it's not past mollie to fake them), you just make me more confident that you're her buddy.

In post 1758, Grimgroove wrote:Now that you're here, explain why your townread on Amrun is more than what I made it out to be, and tell me why Amrun is not an option for a lynch anymore?

Because read the game.

Yes, last time you told me to do that it just showed that you hadn't.

Let's try something else:

1754: confirm/deny?

You L-1'd NS and your mind was on lynching Amrun.
That's scum behavior and instantly proves Amrun is not your buddy.
That's what.

That's not scum behavior. That behavior of town who is convinced that Amrun is scum.
You were there, with the reactiontest-Amrun-townread fiasco. How can you possibly forget that context?
It's similar to betting your life on it, but less AtE-ish.

Is Angry Pidgeon scum for having his mind set on lynching me now?
Are you scum for having your mind set on lynching me now?

NEIN!

I don't have my mind set on lynching you. I want to lynch qwints. Get your facts straight.

Yes, replying to the marginal elements of my argumentation will surely not get us derailed and piss off the other players with yet another senseless stream of discussions.

Do you agree that a lynch on Amrun would clarify a lot more than a lynch on qwints?

I don't lynch people to clarify things. I lynch them because they're scum.