Mafiascum.net

vote varsoon please

Dunnstral wrote:vote varsoon please

No

@Zach: BECAUSE IT'S DUMB AND UNDERMINES THE WHOLE POINT OF COUNTERCLAIMING IN THE FIRST PLACE

In post 1752, Varsoon wrote:@Zach: BECAUSE IT'S DUMB AND UNDERMINES THE WHOLE POINT OF COUNTERCLAIMING IN THE FIRST PLACE

NOW I KNOW THAT OK

Like, Dunnstral and Titus claim Masons when I am a Mason
I tried to expose Dunnstral as scum.
Dunnstral plays the most obv-scum game in response.
No one votes Dunnstral.
Yeah I'm gonna claim and let town see where I'm coming from.
Going back on that as a reaction test just weakens that push to lynch Dunnscum, which is practically confirmed from my PoV

Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Varsoon

You're not doing this stop it

VOTE: Dunnstral

¡LET'S TANGO!

So you are masons then?

Let's get this Varsoon wagon going

Out of that red list, I think Boem and Performer are town, the rest are a-okay

Sorry, I have to sheep my partner and I certainly can't let you vote him after I told you not to.

VOTE: Dunnstral

VOTE: Dunnstral
Doing this before going to sleep

In post 1758, Mirhawk wrote:So you are masons then?

Yeah.
Ultimately, it comes down to who you're gonna trust:
A pair who claimed masons under pressure
or
A dude who counterclaimed masons when it was clear that the claimed mason wasn't going to be lynched otherwise

What's it gonna be?

Dunnstral you keep changing your vote and you keep saying who you wouldn't vote for.

Do you mind making a simple list like 1759 so I know where the heck you're at? Please?

Guys, I'm sticking to what I said.

So long as neither Titus nor Dunnstral recant their Mason claims I will not have a hand in their lynching Day 1.

This is ridiculous. Yes we're masons to CC. No we're not. They're likely town. Yes we are you undermined my push.

In post 1763, Varsoon wrote:

In post 1758, Mirhawk wrote:So you are masons then?

Yeah.
Ultimately, it comes down to who you're gonna trust:
A pair who claimed masons under pressure
or
A dude who counterclaimed masons when it was clear that the claimed mason wasn't going to be lynched otherwise, recanted and then recced to save Sick of it.

What's it gonna be?

Done.

Varsoon wrote:

In post 1758, Mirhawk wrote:So you are masons then?

Yeah.
Ultimately, it comes down to who you're gonna trust:
A pair who claimed masons under pressure
or
A dude who counterclaimed masons when it was clear that the claimed mason wasn't going to be lynched otherwise

What's it gonna be?

That makes us sound like the bad guys. I think WE were under pressure in that regard, in a way, Dunnstral and Titus forced our hands.

I don't know how likely a scum mason would be to push for the lynch of another mason group. A town flip on another group would make them look worse as it would be a confirmed counterclaim.

I'm thinking maybe one of them town and one of thems gambiting. Not sure which is which though. If they're both gambiting they need to stop, that is not helping.

Okay Varsoon at night we have to talk this out so we're not as rough

Two town mason pairs seem extremely unlikely though admittedly not impossible.

Stop being dumb he literally retracted

In post 1771, Zachstralkita wrote:Okay Varsoon at night we have to talk this out so we're not as rough

lol.