Page 71 of 91

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:28 am
by Manuel87
Well i believe the claim now.
right call to watch claimed JK lol hard one.

since noone is going for the safe option have it your way.
VOTE: Infinity324

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:30 am
by Dunnstral
VOTE: Manuel87
This is scum

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:30 am
by Manuel87
How is it resisting to show you a safer option.
you not considering it because you want to be on a scumlynch is retarded but whatever not like this game can be described with a different word.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:41 am
by Something_Smart
what is this I can't even

Dunnstral are you for real

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:42 am
by Infinity 324
VOTE: infinity

Ok sure

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:42 am
by Gamma Emerald
Image

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:42 am
by Something_Smart
called it

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:46 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1753, Something_Smart wrote:what is this I can't even

Dunnstral are you for real
And what have you done recently?

Keeping infinity alive would have been the optimal choice. Town having a watcher, jk, and 3 (?) other roles isn't real

Manuel's claim is fake

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:46 am
by Infinity 324
What'd you guys think of my claim ;)

I was in a really tough spot since there obviously wouldn't be another protective in the game, and claiming watcher would be a cc obviously. I suppose I could've pulled something out of thin air, like "target a player, when that player dies you get their role" or some shit like that. I was expecting a tracker and then I would claim 1-shot watcher 1-shot something else and say ninja made sense in that case, but bleh. Basically I hate the watcher role.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:47 am
by Dunnstral
Manuel voted infinity so he could self hammer.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:48 am
by Gamma Emerald
Please lynch Dunnstral tomorrow.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:48 am
by Something_Smart
I mean, if you hadn't slipped up and instead claimed that you received a 1-shot watcher in addition to (or instead of) the 1-shot vig, you might have had a chance.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:49 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1760, Gamma Emerald wrote:Please lynch Dunnstral tomorrow.
Lol

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:49 am
by Infinity 324
Actually I could've called the role I said there an absorber too. Actually there was a scum role in a mini normal I was in that was called absorber, and if you killed someone with a PR you'd become that PR.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:49 am
by Infinity 324
Actually I could've called the role I said there an absorber too. Actually there was a scum role in a mini normal I was in that was called absorber, and if you killed someone with a PR you'd become that PR.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:50 am
by Something_Smart
yeah but that was a scum role

and I actually wondered if you might have had it, lol

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:51 am
by Dunnstral
My work here is dunn

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:51 am
by Something_Smart
Your life will soon be dunn as well

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:52 am
by Gamma Emerald
So are you the mafia PR or not Infinity?

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:53 am
by Dunnstral
We're lynching jarjar/nadr.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:53 am
by Infinity 324
In post 1761, Something_Smart wrote:I mean, if you hadn't slipped up and instead claimed that you received a 1-shot watcher in addition to (or instead of) the 1-shot vig, you might have had a chance
Maybe

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:54 am
by Dunnstral
S_s is also on the table

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:55 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1769, Dunnstral wrote:We're lynching jarjar/nadr.
NO. JARJAR IS TOWN BECAUSE SCUM PUSHED HIM AT THE START OF TODAY.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:56 am
by Dunnstral
Bussing exists

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:56 am
by JarJarDrinks
In post 1769, Dunnstral wrote:We're lynching jarjar/nadr.
if ur town, stop being terrible. I'm practically confirmed @ this point.

pedit: k wanting to lynch S_S is a good start.