Mafiascum.net

In post 1734, Krazy wrote:

In post 1732, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:No it isn’t but he was blatantly obvtown in that one. He was my #2 gent, after Slaxx.

Nancy I <3 u but please stop bringing up the previous run and reads in that run it's really hurting my head

In post 1735, Alisae wrote:

In post 1729, Ankamius wrote:So yeah

I am starting to think it's better to have 2 ladies sit out than to deal with risking vedith being scum or a yolobomber

It cuts the first dance still, but it is a lot less risk and it's easier to plan around than just no lynching and trying to solve the game with the 4 extra players since we can force a large group of scummy and useless players to leave

holy shit you are scum

In post 862, Pink Ball wrote:So, for what I've seen from the gentlemen:
PvtUrist town
Krazy town
RadiantCowbells town
Moment null
Allomancer scum
Dannflor town
DoubtingThomas who?
Dr Worm lol
Vedith town

From the ladies:
Ankamius null
Firebringer town
Alisae null
Nancy Drew 39 town
TheBrie who?
Gamma Emerald town
Pink Ball lol
Taly town

A lot of townreads so I'm happy for that, specially 'cause RC is town and he won't fuck my brains out

See, Urist, your tone here is what I expect from town!you. I think you're null scumreading me 'cause I defended Nancy and you're scumreading her? 'Cause I don't see any reason to scumread this adorable lady

In post 1548, Krazy wrote:

In post 1546, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:When did I become widely obvtown here?

who at present is scumreading you?

In post 1753, Vedith wrote:him

In post 1703, Krazy wrote:by a desperate scumread player like vedith

In post 1754, PvtUrist wrote:

In post 1753, Vedith wrote:him

In post 1705, Dannflor wrote:Does scum ever go for the gambit of persistently insisting that they don't really wanna partner up at all for the pre-dance? Apathy isn't necessarily alignment indicative but idk why scum would be that vocal about potentially just offing themselves for the greater good or whatever

In post 1721, Ankamius wrote:That's why it pissed me off to no end that Firebringer rolled the 8 coin lady and pissed it away like he did

In post 1726, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:He is being blatantly anti-town and unless he gives up his schtick, he isn’t making it anywhere near the first dance.

In post 1757, Vedith wrote:

In post 1705, Dannflor wrote:Does scum ever go for the gambit of persistently insisting that they don't really wanna partner up at all for the pre-dance? Apathy isn't necessarily alignment indicative but idk why scum would be that vocal about potentially just offing themselves for the greater good or whatever

Keep saying it means fuck all without actions.
It's 100% AtE so it alone is NAI.
Personally I'm bored of reading it and each time I see Ank post it I read through Dr Worms ISO to get some actual content.

In post 1759, Vedith wrote:

In post 1726, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:He is being blatantly anti-town and unless he gives up his schtick, he isn’t making it anywhere near the first dance.

Fire puts up a front of not caring but majority of his actions have reasoning, regardless of alignment.
This just falls back into someone not playing how you think they should.

In post 1761, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Your joking right?

In post 1762, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:???

This wasn’t about Fire, I was obviously referring to Worm. Fire and you are already paired up, so how could you possibly think I was referring to him?

In post 1763, Vedith wrote:

In post 1761, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Your joking right?

It's exaggerated but it's true.

In post 1765, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:What content? Worm is just trolling.

In post 1759, Vedith wrote:

In post 1726, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:He is being blatantly anti-town and unless he gives up his schtick, he isn’t making it anywhere near the first dance.

Fire puts up a front of not caring but majority of his actions have reasoning, regardless of alignment.
This just falls back into someone not playing how you think they should.

In post 1768, Firebringer wrote:I highly doubt all my actions have a reasoning that goes further beyond "it amused me" in 90% of my actions.

In post 1652, Dannflor wrote:He fits the bill of probably won't be widely town read (at least I don't really town read him) but has a chance of maybe getting a long with Nancy

Pvt is probably preferred here though. I think the pairs should probably prioritize how well they'll work together so that's up to Nancy probably to decide

playstyle that was more common back in 2012 when you joined

best way I can describe it is that old school is more each post is a high school essay while most posts nowadays are twitter posts

lmao yea ok I get what you mean

I played a bit back then and then only came back recently, so I haven't quite adjusted, and probably won't ever fully because I like being more transparent in my thought processes than the twitter post style allows

In post 1691, Krazy wrote:What's really annoying is I can't even talk about how annoyed I am about not being able to talk about the game I want to talk about with Dann because talking about how annoyed that makes me would out the game in question.

So I kinda just have to shove all that back with a pole and say, "Okay, yeah, I have yet to find a good reason to scumread Dann here"

He's in my upper bracket until he has a reason not to be in my upper bracket

In post 1733, Krazy wrote:I think trying to talk people into that might be informative but part of me thinks it would be a hard sell

Like which ladies would you want to sit out? Pink Ball would just dance with Worm to spite you and I wouldn't want you one of the two ladies sitting out anyway

So what you'd be left with... TheBrie? And I don't know she'd be on board either tbh

In post 1771, TheBrie wrote: Good enough for me. I've not played with town!Dann before, so I've not got a good reference, but

he's a player I like so I want him as town.