Page 71 of 86

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:18 am
by Fuscosco
also, whats the deal wrt the N0 poison?

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:19 am
by Fuscosco
We didnt visit N0, and we were jailed N1

so there's an abscent kill?

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:19 am
by Persivul
In post 1749, Fuscosco wrote:it heavily implies a second 3p
How so?

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:23 am
by Fuscosco
how not?

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:24 am
by Fuscosco
a regular Aristotle over here :b

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:27 am
by Persivul
In post 1753, Fuscosco wrote:how not?
WTF, seriously, an argument from ignorance?

It's a mini. We've had a 3P flip. Per site meta it's very unlikely that there's another.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:28 am
by Persivul
In post 1, funkybike1 wrote:42. This game begins on Night 0. No killing actions may be taken on Night 0, but all other Night actions may take place.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:36 am
by Irrelephant11
Persivul will you be claiming
We’re 80% of the way to massclaim I figure we might as well

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:36 am
by Irrelephant11
But also stop me if we shouldn’t obviously I wouldn’t know if there’s a good reason to not

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 6:49 am
by Persivul
Yes, I can claim. I've been holding off to use myself as bait, see who jumps on my wagon.

I'm a 1X Governor and can self target. In my opinion that's town 99% of the time.

The way it's worded it seemed to me that once I governed, day would continue and another person could be lynched. So, I thought if I got run up I could prove my role without costing us a lynch. But, that's not typical, so I asked mod. I was wrong - once I govern, day is over, and there's no lynch. So, I could prove it, but that's probably not good strategy.

There's a time restriction on it, but I'm not saying what it is.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 7:04 am
by Irrelephant11
Nice
I’m the vt

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 8:03 am
by Persivul
In post 1760, Irrelephant11 wrote:Nice
I’m the vt
Yeah like I believe that. :lol: No offense (well maybe a little) but you're becoming like A50 with all the fake news reaction tests.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 8:28 am
by Irrelephant11
I mean I guess that’s fair? But I did crumb it
In post 1081, Irrelephant11 wrote:My rolecard suggests that nobody else has my role
If I flip I’m not sure that part will flip so I’m posting it
My role PM (paraphrased) says “you’re unlucky. You’re the one vt”
Which is what has given me the confidence to go all out with gambits

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 8:29 am
by Persivul
Fair enough.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:47 am
by RCEnigma
Ya know...I'll bite. VOTE: succinct

I can see all of these as viable roles though, which bothers me. And I doubt safeclaims were given out.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:48 am
by RCEnigma
UNVOTE: umm..

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:49 am
by RCEnigma
So yeah I kind of feel the lack of scum power exposed means mirror may be scum however fusc is scum utility if he's town.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:51 am
by Blake Belladonna
UNVOTE: Succinct

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:22 am
by Fuscosco
right

percy, rce, succinct are how I order my preferences

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:25 am
by Blake Belladonna
VOTE: Persivul

I think RCEs vote was a hammer, but I want to do this anyways just because.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:45 am
by funkybike1
I have RCE's vote as L-1, unless I missed something.


VOTE COUNT
5 of 9 votes are required to lynch.
Succinct (2):
Irrelephant11, insomnia
Persivul (2):
Fuscezu, Blake Belladonna
Blake Belladonna (1):
Succinct
Not Voting (4):
Persivul, ceejayvinoya, ClearlyClarity, RCEnigma
Deadline is in (expired on 2019-06-16 12:00:00)


Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:56 am
by Blake Belladonna
That's a relief.

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:03 am
by Irrelephant11
I agree it’s too quick to flip Succinct
It would be nice to see them post a couple times this gameday

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 2:16 pm
by Fuscezu
Spoiler: altslippers
In post 1768, Fuscosco wrote:right
In post 1723, Fuscosco wrote:
In post 1718, Irrelephant11 wrote:I guess it can just be Succinct/Blake
that's adecent team comp
In post 1725, Fuscosco wrote:
In post 1722, insomnia wrote:
In post 1602, Blake Belladonna wrote:Fuscosco has been the voice of reason this game, I trust him to carry this game if it comes down to it.

I would leave my top four townreads alone, but ClearlyClarity should be revisited if she lives too long and my PoE is all dead.

Insomnia, lynch Persivul. You've trusted my reads before in the past, this time you can do so confidently.
Who are you
i am slightly worried about being pocketed tbh
In post 1728, Fuscosco wrote:yea but i have a hellova lot more experience and versatility as both alignments
In post 1731, Fuscosco wrote:no, I claimed disloyal doc who protted percy.

Percy's play here is kinda like he has a 3rd agenda, no?
In post 1749, Fuscosco wrote:it heavily implies a second 3p
In post 1750, Fuscosco wrote:also, whats the deal wrt the N0 poison?
In post 1751, Fuscosco wrote:We didnt visit N0, and we were jailed N1

so there's an abscent kill?
In post 1753, Fuscosco wrote:how not?
In post 1753, Fuscosco wrote:how not?
In post 1754, Fuscosco wrote:a regular Aristotle over here :b
percy, rce, succinct are how I order my preferences

ahhhh all that was fuscosco


~fuscosco

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:47 pm
by Blake Belladonna
Insomnia and Irrelephant, can you explain how you see Persivul's meta for me please?

I think this is the exact same circumstance as I've seen with a few other players on the site where they have a reputation for being hard to read, but are players that I can read easily because they play specifically in a way where I pick up on the differences between their two alignments very easily.

I want to be sure that this is a similar scenario because I see no way that Persivul is legitimately town here using those same tells, and I have no reason to disbelieve that they are faulty in this case.