Mafiascum.net

You have enough time to post 158 times but not enough time to do anything meaningful

You have enough time to fill the thread with crappy AtE but not enough to give a read on anyone

like...????

Well I want my online friend to but at the same time I feel if I just actually try a bit more and play how I wanted to play, I may no longer hate the way I’ve been playing. We’ll see I guess.

In post 1746, Gentleman 6 wrote:I hate the way that Lady 5 is playing regardless of their alignment.

Yo can you talk to me.

How do you currently feel about your pairing?

At the time, did you believe you were making a town/town pair?

In post 1750, Gentleman 6 wrote:You have enough time to post 158 times but not enough time to do anything meaningful

You have enough time to fill the thread with crappy AtE but not enough to give a read on anyone

like...????

Ok this is unnecessary shade.
Excuse me, I gave my reads.
In the slight chance I do remain and make it to the Dance.
I’ll be having my eye on you and that 8th Lady!

The slot is salvageable from where you are, at least from a quality of play stance, but if I refuse to exercise for weeks on end, complaining about how I hate that I do it won't change that.

I think that scum are trying to reposition my slot as a SvT pair to discredit my reads and keep me from being an endgame slot so that whatever scum's top performer can take the endgame slot instead.
I have very little to say to you right now G5 besides that I don't think that L8 is scum and I don't trust the sudden turn against them that I already expected to happen if they were town.

In post 1752, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1746, Gentleman 6 wrote:I hate the way that Lady 5 is playing regardless of their alignment.

Yo can you talk to me.

How do you currently feel about your pairing?

At the time, did you believe you were making a town/town pair?

They would rather give shade then answer question. It’s Obvious.
Or they miss stuff like me.

1 or the other.

In post 1753, Lady 5 wrote:Ok this is unnecessary shade.
Excuse me, I gave my reads.
In the slight chance I do remain and make it to the Dance.
I’ll be having my eye on you and that 8th Lady!

This isn't shade and I'm not even commenting on your alignment, I'm saying that your play is pretty crap.

In post 1753, Lady 5 wrote:Ok this is unnecessary shade.
Excuse me, I gave my reads.
In the slight chance I do remain and make it to the Dance.
I’ll be having my eye on you and that 8th Lady!

This isn't shade and I'm not even commenting on your alignment, I'm saying that your play is pretty crap.

In post 1748, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 1746, Gentleman 6 wrote:I hate the way that Lady 5 is playing regardless of their alignment.

Yeah me too!

In post 1749, Lady 5 wrote:That’s why I want someone who has time to do it to take this slot.

In post 1754, Gentleman 4 wrote:The slot is salvageable from where you are, at least from a quality of play stance, but if I refuse to exercise for weeks on end, complaining about how I hate that I do it won't change that.

No but what will change is if I stop playing like garbage and play like I wanted to, I can definitely salvage my position in this game.

In post 1759, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1748, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 1746, Gentleman 6 wrote:I hate the way that Lady 5 is playing regardless of their alignment.

Yeah me too!

In post 1749, Lady 5 wrote:That’s why I want someone who has time to do it to take this slot.

shoot: L5

I have a busy life, this is hard for me.

Is there a specific reason you would like to share G6 or are you saving it for the dance?

Talking about replacing out is against the spirit at best. Do it or don't, we don't need to hear about it. If you want to do it, you tell the mod you're leaving and you don't get a say in who replaces you.

If you have time to complain in thread you have time to actually play the game.
We're at the point where I'm just like kinda disgusted with the possibility of losing to scum who just used their time in the game complaining about not having time to play the game.

In post 1762, Gentleman 5 wrote:Is there a specific reason you would like to share G6 or are you saving it for the dance?

I see almost no reason to talk about this before the scum have made their nightkill.

In post 1755, Gentleman 6 wrote:I think that scum are trying to reposition my slot as a SvT pair to discredit my reads and keep me from being an endgame slot so that whatever scum's top performer can take the endgame slot instead.
I have very little to say to you right now G5 besides that I don't think that L8 is scum and I don't trust the sudden turn against them that I already expected to happen if they were town.

I know this is a pretty big ask, but if you get the chance, would you be willing to sort through the thread and find who's tried to shade Lady 8 after you propose, and if you're feeling particularly useful, find the players that changed position from before your proposal?

If I had an incredible and unimpeachable reason to townread her, and I outed that, I'd just ensure that we get targeted and scum try to set L9 up to be lynched instead.
If I didn't really have the best reasons and I outed that, I'd give scum the information that they can nightkill another slot instead and that my pairing isn't ever endgame material.

There's literally no reason to talk about it.

Exactly. A good gentleman doesn't excessively discuss his lady in public.

As long as L5 doesnt live to see the dance, Ill go along with it.

I think we need to get to the dance already.

70 pages and I feel like we are still going nowhere.

I think L6 is town and I think she should get a good pairing.

It'll just be easier and more efficient if you just paired up with your highest available townreads ok thx

I think that G3 and L6 will both get along with each other and are both town.

In post 1762, Gentleman 5 wrote:Is there a specific reason you would like to share G6 or are you saving it for the dance?

That guy always pinged me and I feel he throws Unessasary shade