Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:19 pm
PineIn post 1748, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Pine or Ank.In post 1747, Alisae wrote:also you haven't given me a reply on you giving me your vote
Choose.
PineIn post 1748, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Pine or Ank.In post 1747, Alisae wrote:also you haven't given me a reply on you giving me your vote
Choose.
wat?In post 1710, Sherlock and Watson wrote:Bitmap if so why did you ask if anyone feels the same when that's almost verbatim what I said
-S
not a fan of itIn post 1713, AaronFrost wrote:I think it is something that scum!Boon is capable of doing if he wanted to create noise/confusion (I don't even follow the logic much tbh) but I'm not sure scum!Boon chooses to do that in this gamestate 50 pages into the game.In post 1707, Bitmap wrote:They felt genuine and seemed like even though his approach (setup spec) was bad, his intentions didn't seem bad.In post 1703, AaronFrost wrote:Why do you like them?In post 1559, Bitmap wrote:Am I the only one that likes Boon's recent posts?
What do you make of Oka's hard on for lynching FL, because that's not giving me good vibes right now.
In post 1557, Sherlock and Watson wrote:The stuff before he drifted into pick spec looked ok tbh
The pick stuff was bad but I'm not sure it was scummy bad
Then again boon by now knows I expect him to flip his read three times on me in any given conversation so maybe he's playing into that
-S
In post 1559, Bitmap wrote:Am I the only one that likes Boon's recent posts?
lol like it was two posts after?In post 1707, Bitmap wrote:They felt genuine and seemed like even though his approach (setup spec) was bad, his intentions didn't seem bad.In post 1703, AaronFrost wrote:Why do you like them?In post 1559, Bitmap wrote:Am I the only one that likes Boon's recent posts?
there we go buddy, now you're really getting into character as an RC-fanboy :3In post 1753, Bitmap wrote:no one cares what u think
if that's why you wanted, why'd you reject Nancy? It's like impossible to break 200 d1 without herIn post 1758, Alisae wrote:Even in 1 day?
If we could get the game to 200 pages in D1 that’da be great
you should vote flavor wowIn post 1733, Espeonage wrote:what do you have in mind?
Oh shit, btw you are perfectly placed to understand why I am so excited about my role I just realised. You can stick around.
My reads are betterIn post 1759, Sherlock and Watson wrote:there we go buddy, now you're really getting into character as an RC-fanboy :3In post 1753, Bitmap wrote:no one cares what u think
-S
No I wouldn't.In post 1764, OkaPoka wrote:bitmap rc would vote flavor here :3
If I was playing normally, instead of part scumfuck, we'd probably have more.In post 1760, Sherlock and Watson wrote:if that's why you wanted, why'd you reject Nancy? It's like impossible to break 200 d1 without herIn post 1758, Alisae wrote:Even in 1 day?
If we could get the game to 200 pages in D1 that’da be great
-S
I'll make sure flavor scum won't win if you die.In post 1769, OkaPoka wrote:if im lynched today and i flip town can i count on you to kill flavor for me titus
Rookie errorIn post 1765, Bitmap wrote:I don’t have FL blacklisted so no lol
Most of the early posting wasn't made by maria, so judging my posts by saying maria is a good scum player doesn't really cut it for meIn post 900, Spiffeh wrote:Initially I was just ignoring your slot because your content seemed passable enough for players I had no experience with.In post 847, Maki and Kaito wrote:I don't think this sentiment is appropriate here, actually. I don't get why you trust us less based on what we've posted
But I know Maria is a p. good scum player so "passable" isn't enough to just write you off.
Either way I didn't have strong feelings about you earlier, and nothing's really changed!
Don't you say this every game?In post 1466, Flavor Leaf wrote:I was expecting scum to come after me after my posts.
Like, I’m not surprised
I haven't seen a lot of townreads on Gobble though, I don't think that this is happening, at least not for gobbleIn post 1506, Titus wrote:I am worried certain slots are too townread for what they've provided (gobble) that scum are promoting them.
Thoughts?
This post is kind of yikes, are you doing this on purpose?In post 1508, Spiffeh wrote:Hi Titus are you town reading me?
I am the one that started the Ankamius wagon after all!
This is a weird post.In post 1510, gobbledygook wrote:Oh I hope I get nightkilled night 1. I rarely get nightkilled and it would be an honor over people like Ank, FL, Spiffeh, etc
Uh... ok.In post 1517, Bitmap wrote:I like Kaito's posts over Maki just an FYI.
You're being annoying on purpose and trying to frame Maria as scummy for being annoyed by what you're doing - OK. At the very least you're not engaging in good faith here.In post 1573, Flavor Leaf wrote:Also, y’all know I’m one of the biggest reaction test players on site, idk why this stuff continues to boggle’s people’s minds.
If you notice there were 3 people who actively are baton’, and the rest, while not necessarily liking the posts, seem to be spouting town reads.
Those 3 players...were the ones being scum read by me. Oka Poka, Maria, Espeonage
IDK why you would do that, that's annoying and we already have to deal with TSE in this game, and I fail to see how this is a good tactic.In post 1577, Ankamius wrote:the fundamental thing is that my stated reads list was literally RNGed.
I don't get it, but OK.In post 1577, Ankamius wrote:I'm not outing my reads at this point because I still see more value in watching the game unfold as an observer rather than an active participant.
I don't understand what you're referring to here. Don't really think we're buddying you.In post 1649, Espeonage wrote:Happy to be buddied for a day or two so idc if they are scum rn.In post 1646, Titus wrote:Hey, what do you guys think of the MariaR/Dunn hydra?
We're still waiting to see what Pine has to say about ascetic stuff right now. And for him to acknowledge us, also. I think some people still need to claim whether they're ascetic - Gobble?In post 1664, Amrun wrote:Maki is correct here; spiritual vote on Sherlock & Watson but I don’t know the VC or anything.
R&R aren’t scummy except the claim but I do actually think a scum is likely to be ascetic, whether they claim it or not, and this weird claim fromS&W deserves to be lynched.
No, they're spiritually sheeping the argument in post 569In post 1667, Sherlock and Watson wrote:"Shitposting is scummy"
This is the argument you're spiritually sheeping, Amrun?
-S