Mafiascum.net

In post 1747, gobbledygook wrote:HOLY CLUCK

IF I WANTED TO CONTINUE TO LIve WHY DO I NOT JUST SAY OK GIVE ME YOUR LEASH TARGETS

I don't know. Why didn't you do that?

In post 1743, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1741, skitter30 wrote:Also the wagon had stalled so like ... why, at that point, rock the boat and change up the situation that took him out of the immediate lynch zone

Because it seemed like most people weren't willing to give him another day?

And? How does this explain anything

I’m done.

Well, I don’t know about everyone else, but I sure feel pretty good about the scumteam not being (skitter, gobbles, S_S)!

Also turkey I just went back over to look for your “scumslip” specifically in deb’s game and lol that was so egregiously fake that I have no idea how anyone voted you for it

UNVOTE:

I wanna check my work before we do this and make sure that I don’t think the turkey is gambiting

I think it’s very, very unlikely I change my mind but I’d be really pissed at myself if there’s something in his ISO that I think screams town and he gets lynched while I’m asleep

Also may I just say that while this is a stressful game and if gobbles is town there have been SIGNIFICANT ~*shenanigans*~ I appreciate that we’ve managed to not have anyone be toxic so far, and thank you for that @all

In post 1687, skitter30 wrote:Gobble doesnt make sense as groupscum tho ... he got run up twice and the game magically freezes when he claims sk ?
And you're pushing him now ?

Pb you're going to have to elaborate

I've been pushing him non stop, not now.

What did you do to avoid the game freezing?

In post 1708, skitter30 wrote:If you're sk why dont you just claim vig
If you're groupscum why dont you just claim literally anything else

You're falling for the oldest scum trick in mafia history.

"this makes no sense as scum". You think gobble didn't know that?

Judge the bird for his actions: he got to L-1 because players who have played with him thought he was a bit off. He's now voting SS, the most suitable counterwagon.

Pink bol, Blake thinks ur scum

Btw is that a new title?

In post 1759, Menalque wrote:Pink bol, Blake thinks ur scum

I know, it's delicious

I kinda think u might be too </3

Hmmm turkey makes a good point saying that he could've gone with the leash thing, so he had to unclaim 'cause he's not really the SK. Unless he's planning to no kill until the end of times. Let's see: town!gobble's reasoning behind the claim and the unclaim after I don't really get it. SK!gobble's reasoning would be to no kill until the opportunity arises. scum!gobble same as town.

So ok gobble could go either way, but I think that SK!gobble unclaiming SK is a brilliant move. SK!gobble can't win if everyone knows he's the SK 'cause he'll eventually die. So the only way to get to endgame, his absolute only course of action, is unclaiming now (because doing it later would get him immediately lynched). I think turkey succumbed to pressure and claimed his role thinking that would save him. SK!gobble would be scumsiding right now, 'cause he won't kill during the night and makes it harder for town to achieve wincon.

So in conclusion, if gobble is SK, he has to be lynched now. And people like skitter trying to make it look like the bad choice is either really wrong or really scummy hurt my tummy.

In post 1762, Menalque wrote:I kinda think u might be too </3

That would be delicious too

In post 1764, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 1762, Menalque wrote:I kinda think u might be too </3

That would be delicious too

A delicious recipe for sadness maybe

Mena, scumread me. I really think that's the best path to actually get a correct townread on me. You always start with a slight townread on me because you don't want me to be scum. Conceal your emotions for a bit and see beyond. You've been played by scum!Pink Ball twice. You will know, and if you don't I'll take it as a compliment.

In post 1760, Menalque wrote:Btw is that a new title?

Yeah I like the aesthetic of it, like it fits so well with the username, also Pink Ball, Silver Bullet has a ring to it because of the similar imagery. Also I kept calling myself Silver Bullet lol

It’s a cool title, I dig it for you. Also, that’s all it takes to get a title? Sweet, Solvey McSolverson supports this idea

(Also I do scumread you, I wasn’t kidding even though I was being sweet bc it’s u. I think you’re playing a quiet game that kinda reminds me of what you did in like AvP which also had a pretty stacked PL.)

I don't think I've been quiet tho, not even close to what AvP was at start. I just laid back for one day 'cause I got a lot of work to do, and there wasn't a lot of content anyway.

Tell me Solvey, if I am scum, what's my narrative right now?

In post 1620, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:

In post 1608, skitter30 wrote:hey that's what i said !

datisi, jingle, and mena a bit come to mind

In post 1609, skitter30 wrote:oh mariar too

Interesting.

Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal. Bonus points if they have a very low content to noise ratio.

there isn't really anybody who fits taht description i think? nobody joined the wagon except for fire and he didn't know gobble claimed sk
i think taht there's at least one scum in that least of names

does your "at least one scum in datisi/bingle/mena/maria" solely depend on s_s being scum or?

~

In post 1641, gobbledygook wrote:At any rate, I can’t lolkill anyone because I can’t kill anyone. I’m not actually a serial killer. I claimed that so people get their Goodies and feel like they accomplished something with their terrible votes, while also allowing for people to scumhunt. Clearly no one wants to scumhunt which makes me suspicious of those people.

sigh.

~

In post 1644, Blake Belladonna wrote:Firebringer is town.

can you please elaborate on this?

~

In post 1681, Menalque wrote:Datisi do you buy this?

i'd still like to kill the turkey if that's what you're asking. i can sorta buy the "game completely died so gobbles is not groupscum" argument but that SK claim is completely blatantly antitown at best and i don't think i want to deal with the wifom that it brings, + it might hit the SK so win/win

also for how many days will "we can't lynch skitter today because if it's a mislynch scum are gonna laugh at us" be in effect? the discussion skitt and S_S were having in some way echoes their earlier discussion for me (in that S_S's position seems very clear to me)

~

ay yo gobbles, can you cut that bullshit out where you call anyone who dared to vote against you terrible / having to be ashamed about it / incapable of thought / needing a doctor to check them or whatever?

~

In post 1739, Menalque wrote:I’d like to hear from some people other than the 4 of us tbh, especially Maria and PP and datisi

helo

~

In post 1756, Menalque wrote:I appreciate that we’ve managed to not have anyone be toxic so far

...

~

@PB, sorry if i missed, can you give me shotgun reads or something? i feel like i'm aware of little of your thought process rn (and i may or may not be too lazy to go through the posts again)

In post 1771, Datisi wrote:does your "at least one scum in datisi/bingle/mena/maria" solely depend on s_s being scum or?

No, it has nothing to do with ss

wasn't there the logic of "if s_s is scum then his shading of people defending the gobble wagon makes sense if his partners are on wagon and those people were on wagon"? (1601)

the "at least one scum in datisi/bingle/mena/maria" is then just "scum want a gobble lynch"?

It's mostly the latter, yes, plus the fact that gamestate froze supporting that view