Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2020 7:51 pm
In post 1740, Dumb and Dumber wrote:@mod: Was part of Something_Smart's role PM hidden on flip?I don't find information on the corruption threshold for death.
-Dumbass
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 1740, Dumb and Dumber wrote:@mod: Was part of Something_Smart's role PM hidden on flip?I don't find information on the corruption threshold for death.
-Dumbass
You saying it might be maf-indicative if all maf die at 0 corruption right? Was going to say something about this and how Porkens might've switched "gains/loses" in their claim (so originally, loses 1 corruption for using an ability), but Porkens mentioned a "beast" that takes a hit for them if they get to that point. So it doesn't make sense for them to be too worried either way.In post 1718, catboi wrote: A thing that's bothersome about porkens's claim that no one has brought up is how he has an ability that raises his corruption but apparently had no problem hammering on day 1, it doesn't really seem to hold that he'd be so cavalier about corruption when it potentially reduces the amount of times he could use his ability.
This isn't a bad thought, but it would take us 2 nights to kill someone, and if maf have that same corruption eating-ability our attempts could beIn post 1702, catboi wrote:This is a wacky thought but: it's possible the other demons share a similar condition to Bell of dying at 0 corruption. I think we might want to have both cleric claims double up on their target tonight.
I wonder what it says about both of us that I don't think anyone has called me anything close to "clear minded", ever.In post 1701, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I wanna see what Redtea has to say about all this before i place my vote again. He's like my clear minded soulmate.
UNVOTE:
What the fuck are you talking about?In post 1748, Porkens wrote:@ banana: their voting yes have been all over the place and seem much lorenonterestedbin just wagoning than using it to find scum. The Parkinson’s also pretty egreigious. The reaction to the bell flip was textbook scum and the vote record was baaaad. Also I think their tone and approach are pretty obviously scum.
I’m not afraid of hammering yesterday because I thought I was hammering scum.
If they have other roles with the ability to steal corruption they'll need to take it from people who already have it, which is a tradeoff I'm fine withIn post 1752, redtea wrote:This isn't a bad thought, but it would take us 2 nights to kill someone, and if maf have that same corruption eating-ability our attempts could be
fruitless
hehehe
Might be safe to double up on someone anyway, if corruption is what caused the second kill. 'nothing else it's a deterrent. Or if we wanna bank on no more corruption-eaters.
Their reaction seemed very contrived to me. Like they were hiding their real reaction and trying to have a “natural town like reaction”In post 1749, BananaCucho wrote:Can you elaborate on some bits there? How is the reaction textbook scum? What do you dislike about their vote record?
What contradictions?In post 1758, Porkens wrote:Their reaction seemed very contrived to me. Like they were hiding their real reaction and trying to have a “natural town like reaction”In post 1749, BananaCucho wrote:Can you elaborate on some bits there? How is the reaction textbook scum? What do you dislike about their vote record?
Their votes have been all over the place with very little substantive justifications.
Catboi is actually scummier today, the posts he makes are fake-speculative and There are some real contradictions.
VOTE: catboi
In post 1702, catboi wrote:This is a wacky thought but: it's possible the other demons share a similar condition to Bell of dying at 0 corruption. I think we might want to have both cleric claims double up on their target tonight.
In post 1718, catboi wrote:I re-read D+D's ISO and don't have anything concrete to come back with, I had been avoiding fully writing them off as town. Can't point to anything they've said that's bad, no real strong towntells, but there's some okayish attempts at evaluating and a little bit of flip-flopping on bell's claim I actually like because it feels like real evaluation. Gun to head I'd probably just guess they're town. Wouldn't vote them before porkens or jackel but would put them below the strong townreads.
A thing that's bothersome about porkens's claim that no one has brought up is how he has an ability that raises his corruption but apparently had no problem hammering on day 1, it doesn't really seem to hold that he'd be so cavalier about corruption when it potentially reduces the amount of times he could use his ability.
Note the moral flexibility on corruption. Scum/townreads don’t flow logically or naturally from the predicateIn post 1757, catboi wrote:Have the weird feeling jackel might be town from the "i still have 0 corruption" post even though that thing isn't impossible to fake it feels more likely a thing they'd think of as town. but then I have no idea who else could be scum.
Yep and the partner. Ok game solved everybody we can all go home now.
So Norwee is town now?
You actually scumread DD thoughIn post 1766, Porkens wrote:Is sarcasm not your native language or what?
In post 1599, Dumb and Dumber wrote:This loosely makes me think not-partners
Meh
VOTE: porkens for now until i can do a deeper dive
- dumber
@DD can you walk me through your thought process here? What made you change your mind?
I am not a slave to the gamestate!In post 1769, Dumb and Dumber wrote:He's pushing two of the towniest players in the game (cat, nor), and his pushes are so far removed from the reality of the gamestate that i'm having a hard time seeing it come from a town perspective
Not conversing in good faith? Really? I'm asking you to explain things, like expand on catbois "moral flexability" as I don't understand what you're trying to say, and you're just throwing in sarcastic and snarky remarks the whole wayIn post 1768, Porkens wrote:You are just not conversing in good faith.
Still, I don’t think banana is scum. No think banana is an immaculate radiant and benign force for good in the universe, forsure[/].
I “110%” have called scum between norwee\dumb\catboi
I was dead right on bell and I’m right here again.