Page 71 of 208

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:22 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1746, Noraa wrote:hm?
In post 1743, Noraa wrote:The more people discredit, the more emotionally fueled his reads will be
the more emotionally fueled, the worse
In post 1746, Noraa wrote:hm?
Abr has a history of being emotionally charged and people discrediting him as a reason is bunk.



Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:22 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1748, Fun and Games wrote:
In post 1724, PenguinPower wrote:I think I quite prefer Noraa over Bingle at this point.
Would kinda still prefer bingle
Kinda think noraa is bad!town
Still voting Bingle but I disagree.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:22 pm
by lilith2013
V
OTECOUNT
2.047
P
LAYER
N
AME
C
URRENT
V
OTES
S
TRENGTH
S
PEED
K
NOWLEDGE
P
LAYER
N
AME
Gamma Emerald
None
EL-7
3
2
4
Gamma Emerald
SirCakez
None
EL-7
2
3
3
SirCakez
CreativeMod1
None
EL-7
3
3
3
CreativeMod1
Albert B. Rampage
None
EL-7
3
3
3
Albert B. Rampage
LavarManos
None
EL-7
3
3
4
LavarManos
Bingle
PenguinPower, SirCakez, Fun and Games, Nosferatu
EL-3
3
3
3
Bingle
Nosferatu
None
EL-7
3
3
4
Nosferatu
I Keep Siteflaking
None
EL-7
3
3
3
I Keep Siteflaking
PenguinPower
Bingle
EL-6
3
3
3
PenguinPower
Fun and Games
Albert B. Rampage, Noraa, CreativeMod1, JohnnyFarrar, Gamma Emerald
EL-2
3
3
3
Fun and Games
Noraa
I Keep Siteflaking
EL-6
3
3
3
Noraa
JohnnyFarrar
None
EL-7
3
3
3
JohnnyFarrar
Not Voting
LavarManos
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to eliminate.
Deadline: (expired on 2020-10-14 12:10:00)
Notes:

None
pagetops: Lilith 30 | penguin 16 | ABR 5 | johnnyf 3 | cm1 2 | gamma 2 | fun & games 2 | nosferatu 2 | cakez 2 | noraa 2 | gb 1 | bingle 1 | iks 1 | lavar 1

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:23 pm
by Noraa
In post 1750, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 1746, Noraa wrote:hm?
In post 1743, Noraa wrote:The more people discredit, the more emotionally fueled his reads will be
the more emotionally fueled, the worse
In post 1746, Noraa wrote:hm?
Abr has a history of being emotionally charged and people discrediting him as a reason is bunk.
being emotionally charged should not be the reason for discrediting their opinions. Engaging them nicely will get you better results whether you believe it or not.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:24 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1749, Noraa wrote:*sigh*
am I not supposed to see this as a pocket?
No offense, but you're p clearly tunneled so your opinion on my posts doesn't really matter to me that much

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:25 pm
by PenguinPower
lol
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:25 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1751, PenguinPower wrote:Still voting Bingle but I disagree.
Why scum over bad!town?

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:27 pm
by PenguinPower
I’m not going to effort there if it doesn’t result in an elim. I’ll raise it tomorrow either way, but you should easily be able to piece it together based on comments and follow up from the last two days.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:27 pm
by Noraa
Ur efforting in bingle which also isnt gonna result in a lim

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:28 pm
by PenguinPower
I mean - short answer is intent and not actually caring.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:28 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1758, Noraa wrote:Ur efforting in bingle which also isnt gonna result in a lim
Oh hai - you literally don’t matter in this convo so bye.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:29 pm
by LavarManos
Really hoping ABR is just scum here...
@Fun and Games Not yet. I know there were moments, so I'll go back and pull them here for you.
In post 1749, Noraa wrote:*sigh*
am I not supposed to see this as a pocket?
@Penguin Power Case in point.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:30 pm
by Fun and Games
Fair enough
I'm basically kinda reading it as too scummy to be scum

Also noting that noraa's pocket/egregious townreading of abr thing would be wild if they were partners and i'm scumreading both of them

Like there's several anti-parner-y interactions with people i *strongly* scumread

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:31 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1759, PenguinPower wrote:I mean - short answer is intent and not actually caring.
Sorry, not parsing this?

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:31 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1761, LavarManos wrote:@Fun and Games Not yet. I know there were moments, so I'll go back and pull them here for you.
Fair enough, would like to hear them before u cast q vote plz

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:34 pm
by Noraa
In post 1762, Fun and Games wrote:Fair enough
I'm basically kinda reading it as too scummy to be scum

Also noting that noraa's pocket/egregious townreading of abr thing would be wild if they were partners and i'm scumreading both of them

Like there's several anti-parner-y interactions with people i *strongly* scumread
two posts ago you said I was bad town. Lel ur not a very sneaky scum.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:36 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1763, Fun and Games wrote:
In post 1759, PenguinPower wrote:I mean - short answer is intent and not actually caring.
Sorry, not parsing this?
Fair. I’m slept and should be in bed.

She’s asked me questions to which I’ve responded and she’s ignored the answer or follow up. I’m led to believe she’s asking questions just to ask and doesn’t actually care about the answer. Give her “I have a read on PP it’s null yet scum” and not actually engaging with me on this, I think she’s scum fabricating reads because she has to.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:37 pm
by Fun and Games
Yeah i realized i misspoke in that post, more accurate would have been to say something like: ' if they're both scum noraa's bizarre tr of abr would be wild so it's hard for me to scumbin both of them and so i'm going with scum!abr over scum!noraa since holistically i scumread him more.'

Better?

But ya got your 'gotcha', grats

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:37 pm
by PenguinPower
Sorry - site is being super slow for me rn and I really do need to sleep.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:39 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1766, PenguinPower wrote:I’m led to believe she’s asking questions just to ask and doesn’t actually care about the answer.
Oh yeah absolutely. Cept i think that it's more of a personality thing than anything else, like she's proud of herself for coming to a conclusion, it must be the right one, and she absolutely will ignore evidence that doesnt fit her pov.

G'night penguin!

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:40 pm
by Noraa
Well this certainly is frustrating

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:43 pm
by Fun and Games
I mean you're heaping effusive praise on people who reinforce your conclusions + wont engage with people offering opposing opinions in good faith

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:44 pm
by Noraa
I don't agree with ur reads and I personally think ur scum.

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:45 pm
by LavarManos
Honestly, I'm not feeling so down on Fun and Games anymore, but they could be fooling me. I don't really like either side of ABR/FG. just seemed like a cop out excuse for him not to specify on reasons of thinking your reads were fake. However, I feel like there is somewhat of a "smug" air around you and ABR as if you think his reasons aren't believable and he isn't going to get you hanged which is somewhat surprising but also fits in with a scum narrative.
In post 1585, Fun and Games wrote:Flip bingle and have ABR prove his role on us if Bingle is not guilty.
I like the idea of this though :D

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:46 pm
by lilith2013
boop