Page 71 of 179

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:25 am
by Gamma Emerald
but he's dodging it after opting to avoid me despite it being within the bounds of interaction he set out for us. Like, it's not hard and the fact he's doing it makes little sense in any case but there's at least some motive as scum where there's none as town. And I'd honestly rather have faith he's not that much of an asshole to do that as town.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:26 am
by Flea The Magician
VOTE: Battle Mage

Call me opportunistic, I think pressures good and I trust Gamma to be doing a good thing here.

If ya'll don't like my vote, go read his ISO and make your minds up yourselves. I ain't doing it again because too much nekkid.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:26 am
by Battle Mage
UNVOTE:

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:30 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1739, Flea The Magician wrote:
In post 1724, Battle Mage wrote:Gamma, for goodness sake, can you please leave me alone for once? I just want to enjoy a game of mafia - it's clearly best we don't engage unless it actually relates to the game.
Did I miss a proposal or something?
lol nah, Gamma just takes an unexplained personal beef with me from game to game and rages at me whenever our paths cross. I literally just found out that in our last game he tried to persuade the Mod to send me inappropriate messages on his behalf, so I'm not minded to bother and it also isn't healthy for the game. Even when Gamma is town, he doesn't care about solving my alignment, he just wants to get me elimmed at all costs. The game won't be won or lost based on that, and I'd rather just have fun and not get the abuse.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:30 am
by MURDERCAT
In post 1750, Gamma Emerald wrote:the fact he's doing it makes little sense in any case
This is my opinion

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:33 am
by Alisae
In post 1753, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 1739, Flea The Magician wrote:
In post 1724, Battle Mage wrote:Gamma, for goodness sake, can you please leave me alone for once? I just want to enjoy a game of mafia - it's clearly best we don't engage unless it actually relates to the game.
Did I miss a proposal or something?
lol nah, Gamma just takes an unexplained personal beef with me from game to game and rages at me whenever our paths cross. I literally just found out that in our last game he tried to persuade the Mod to send me inappropriate messages on his behalf, so I'm not minded to bother and it also isn't healthy for the game. Even when Gamma is town, he doesn't care about solving my alignment, he just wants to get me elimmed at all costs. The game won't be won or lost based on that, and I'd rather just have fun and not get the abuse.
Gamma....

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:34 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1751, Flea The Magician wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

Call me opportunistic, I think pressures good and I trust Gamma to be doing a good thing here.

If ya'll don't like my vote, go read his ISO and make your minds up yourselves. I ain't doing it again because too much nekkid.
I won't call you opportunistic, as I don't think there's an opportunity here to be taken. Broad consensus seems to be that I'm town (or at least, less scummy than others), I've had a small wagon on me, which included you, for most of the game and it didn't go anywhere. In short, I don't think your vote creates any meaningful pressure, and I don't think "sheeping Gamma" is any more credible a reason for a wagon than some of mine you have previously criticised.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:38 am
by Battle Mage
ok I'm liking the recent interactions with Murdercat more, so let's try

VOTE: Blitzo

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:12 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1753, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 1739, Flea The Magician wrote:
In post 1724, Battle Mage wrote:Gamma, for goodness sake, can you please leave me alone for once? I just want to enjoy a game of mafia - it's clearly best we don't engage unless it actually relates to the game.
Did I miss a proposal or something?
lol nah, Gamma just takes an unexplained personal beef with me from game to game and rages at me whenever our paths cross. I literally just found out that in our last game he tried to persuade the Mod to send me inappropriate messages on his behalf, so I'm not minded to bother and it also isn't healthy for the game. Even when Gamma is town, he doesn't care about solving my alignment, he just wants to get me elimmed at all costs. The game won't be won or lost based on that, and I'd rather just have fun and not get the abuse.
Genuinely curious what you think my game here is with the question I am asking you.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:14 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Like, you seem to be implying there's some personal agenda in it, so now I'm challenging you to follow up with what you think it is if you're going to continue to avoid me on this.
I can't exactly move on if you don't give me the chance to have normal interactions with you.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:16 pm
by SirCakez
In post 1741, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually BM, there's NO REASON for you to dodge me, as this line of questioning is ENTIRELY GAME BASED.
VOTE: Battle Mage
Do it.
In post 1745, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do y'all really think getting pissy at me for an out-of-game gripe that's essentially OVER and using that as an excuse to dodge GAME-RELATED QUESTIONING is town behavior?????
This just seems like stupid beef rather then a legit reason for the vote
In post 1751, Flea The Magician wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

Call me opportunistic, I think pressures good and I trust Gamma to be doing a good thing here.

If ya'll don't like my vote, go read his ISO and make your minds up yourselves. I ain't doing it again because too much nekkid.
This vote on the other hand is definitely scummy opportunism

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:18 pm
by Gamma Emerald
I mean there's beef but BM is the one who fucking started it this time. I just want a damn answer and he's being obnoxious acting like I have some ulterior motive I DON'T FUCKING HAVE

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:20 pm
by Flea The Magician
In post 1760, SirCakez wrote:
In post 1751, Flea The Magician wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

Call me opportunistic, I think pressures good and I trust Gamma to be doing a good thing here.

If ya'll don't like my vote, go read his ISO and make your minds up yourselves. I ain't doing it again because too much nekkid.
This vote on the other hand is definitely scummy opportunism
Why does it feel like you're constantly trying to shade me?
Do you need a hug or something? ⊂(◉‿◉)つ

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:37 pm
by Flea The Magician
Because I'm paranoid as fuck apparently and still have you questioning my TODO in my head. rip brain. (╭╮)

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:38 pm
by Flea The Magician
awww that one doesn't show.
(
X
╭╮
X
)

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:39 pm
by Gamma Emerald
that's a towntell for flea I think

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:41 pm
by Blitzo
I don't doubt that there may be issues between Gamma and BM.
To be honest I don't really think it's my business unless it becomes gamebreaking somehow, but I don't think that's really the case here either.
What I doubt is how much that actually matters when BM is actually quite guilty of acting this way thus far.
I'm also lost as to why he's switching back to me here.
@Gamma - no, I can't use line breaks right now sorry.
@pooky - again - is this real or not?
I need actual thoughts to come out of your mouth plx.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:43 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1766, Blitzo wrote:@Gamma - no, I can't use line breaks right now sorry.
thanks for answering tbh
like honestly that was rhetorical but acknowledging me is cool B
)

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:01 pm
by Blitzo
Hey I'm reading the thread yo.
Anyways.
I also remember you said something about my case but I didn't quite follow?
I don't exactly know what you mean when you said "context" and would like some elaboration.
Normally I wouldn't care but a lot of people are voting me for reasons that I can't even seem to find anymore so I think I need to dig deep here since that can't just be the end all of everything in this game.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:08 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1209, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1207, Taly wrote:trading BMs life in this game for a conversation with DBG...
eh?
also re: lurksack BM he's been posting but for context he had like 200 posts a few hours into xenoblade 2 mafia and had posted 2 times the amount of the next highest poster
so this is contrasted just off of that, but I don't believe in raw activity reads, same with how I read creature, it's about the content of the posts as well.
this was my only post where I mentioned context

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:16 pm
by SirCakez
In post 1762, Flea The Magician wrote:
In post 1760, SirCakez wrote:
In post 1751, Flea The Magician wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

Call me opportunistic, I think pressures good and I trust Gamma to be doing a good thing here.

If ya'll don't like my vote, go read his ISO and make your minds up yourselves. I ain't doing it again because too much nekkid.
This vote on the other hand is definitely scummy opportunism
Why does it feel like you're constantly trying to shade me?
Do you need a hug or something? ⊂(◉‿◉)つ
Where else have i shaded you besides your weird to-do list?

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:23 pm
by Flea The Magician
Ok I ran out of steam doing the Taly ISO.

There is a slight recalibration needed of my scumdar, nothing major though so I'm confident in my reads up to now.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:24 pm
by Flea The Magician
In post 1770, SirCakez wrote:
In post 1762, Flea The Magician wrote:
In post 1760, SirCakez wrote:
In post 1751, Flea The Magician wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

Call me opportunistic, I think pressures good and I trust Gamma to be doing a good thing here.

If ya'll don't like my vote, go read his ISO and make your minds up yourselves. I ain't doing it again because too much nekkid.
This vote on the other hand is definitely scummy opportunism
Why does it feel like you're constantly trying to shade me?
Do you need a hug or something? ⊂(◉‿◉)つ
Where else have i shaded you besides your weird to-do list?
You haven't, my brains being weird ⊙▽⊙

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:25 pm
by Blitzo
@Gamma - you are correct.
The correct term I meant to use was critically.
Honestly the more I talk about it the more I realize it probably doesn't matter but, you know, I'm here now.

Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:27 pm
by Gamma Emerald
yeah tbh I think you're town rn, your play seems similar enough to 2170 and I don't see strong scum motive in your play (though like, 90% of my scum motive I saw from you in that game came from the hood LOL)