Mafiascum.net

In post 1747, Datisi wrote:titus, i'm not scum with anyone :/


titus, i'm not scum with anyone :/

No shit. You're locktown. Anything I said to create this impression is wrongly interpreted.

In post 1746, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 1675, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1659, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1569, ChaosOmega wrote:It feels like Gamma and Luke are both trying to pull momentum away from Umlaut here.

VOTE: Lukewarm

-----

Also, I'd rather not claim, but there is a reason I had an about-face on Umlaut after N1 and had my vote locked on him all D2.

Guessing it has to do with what Umlaut flipped?

Umlaut flipped neighbor, not neighborizor, so I feel like that would not result in a change over night, right?

Am I dense?

I thought Chaos maybe read the setup info N1 and reoriented off that perhaps

also why do you think scum might have thought you had a guilty Dats?

also the fact that both luke and alch have returned, probably acknowledged that omega is softing a guilty, and haven't unvoted is like, hm.

pedit @ alch: around the same time. umlaut was v/la for a bit i think, but he never picked it up again. and yeah, i think there was a clear drop in his effort sometime early-mid d1, because at first he was at least trying to sound townie.

In post 1751, Gamma Emerald wrote:also why do you think scum might have thought you had a guilty Dats?

i tried to play up my "guys it's totally me who has the guilty" as best as i could, and at least two people bought it it seems, probably more. if i managed to trick at least one scumfuck, that's enough. and considering that after umlaut redflip i'm never getting yeeted regardless, i was the most logical shot last night.

like, actively softing a guilty, today? I thought the deal was chaos got a guilty on umlaut yday

In post 1708, ChaosOmega wrote:I voted scum all day D2, you tried to derail their lim. Your posts seem to suck worse than mine on a surface level glance.

What are your thoughts on Alch and Luke?

This post only makes me even more sure that you’re scum.

In post 1753, Datisi wrote:

In post 1751, Gamma Emerald wrote:also why do you think scum might have thought you had a guilty Dats?

i tried to play up my "guys it's totally me who has the guilty" as best as i could, and at least two people bought it it seems, probably more. if i managed to trick at least one scumfuck, that's enough. and considering that after umlaut redflip i'm never getting yeeted regardless, i was the most logical shot last night.

possibly
tbh tho I also think I played a bit like I had a guilty myself, what with how cagey my umlaut voting reasons were

alch, do you really think scum!omega plays the way he did around scum!umlaut and now locks himself in a pr claim?

In post 1712, MathBlade wrote:Oooh Gamma traitor Luke scum

Me 4th scum.

Like this is just all around bad.

I think I lock town Gamma if Chaos is scum here, maybe Luke too.

Luke is definitely lockTown on a Chaos scum flip.

In post 1754, Gamma Emerald wrote:like, actively softing a guilty, today? I thought the deal was chaos got a guilty on umlaut yday

sorry, was* softing a guilty yesterday

it's been a very long night for me

In post 1713, MathBlade wrote:I think Chaos is searching for a sus that will stick versus believing any of it

This is what I’m thinking too. There’s a sort of desperation in their posts today.

In post 1755, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 1708, ChaosOmega wrote:I voted scum all day D2, you tried to derail their lim. Your posts seem to suck worse than mine on a surface level glance.

What are your thoughts on Alch and Luke?

This post only makes me even more sure that you’re scum.

You've been wrong this whole game, why stop now?

ngl I think a chaos townflip does implicate Alch
VOTE: DkKoba
I think I kinda wanna opt for what is my common denominator rn

In post 1754, Gamma Emerald wrote:like, actively softing a guilty, today? I thought the deal was chaos got a guilty on umlaut yday

We look for scum on Umlaut on Umlaut besides Datisi Gamma Math and Chaos. The concensus was there was a guilty. I bet scum played like it.

In post 1763, Titus wrote:

In post 1754, Gamma Emerald wrote:like, actively softing a guilty, today? I thought the deal was chaos got a guilty on umlaut yday

We look for scum on Umlaut on Umlaut besides Datisi Gamma Math and Chaos. The concensus was there was a guilty. I bet scum played like it.

that narrows it down to NM and one other that idr, and I don't think NM is scum rn

That suggests Alch town.

In post 1763, Titus wrote:

In post 1754, Gamma Emerald wrote:like, actively softing a guilty, today? I thought the deal was chaos got a guilty on umlaut yday

We look for scum on Umlaut on Umlaut besides Datisi Gamma Math and Chaos. The concensus was there was a guilty. I bet scum played like it.

that leaves only you, aristeia and not_mafia.

bussing is the obvious play. i wouldn't be terribly surprised if scum stayed off, then today went "well it was obvious it was a guilty, if i had been scum i would've been bussing" and like, someone like alch is sure as fuck not playing like town right now

In post 1752, Datisi wrote:also the fact that both luke and alch have returned, probably acknowledged that omega is softing a guilty, and haven't unvoted is like, hm.

Omega isn’t softing a guilty. Most people have been saying since D2 he needs to be flipped so if he had anything today that would stop his lim and get a scumflip he would give it. If he were Town he’d know this isn’t the time to be coy about it.

In post 1326, Aristeia wrote:fine VOTE: umlaut

e-1

this was the other Umlaut vote
I could potentially see it being aristeia given literally except like umlaut himself was on board when I tried to counterwagon her

In post 1765, Titus wrote:That suggests Alch town.

what does?

In post 1757, Datisi wrote:alch, do you really think scum!omega plays the way he did around scum!umlaut and now locks himself in a pr claim?

alch give me a plausible reason why scum!omega softs a guilty on a partner the way he did

i don't give a shit about "most people are saying he has to get flipped", scum will have to shoot him tonight lmao

In post 1769, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1765, Titus wrote:That suggests Alch town.

what does?

Scum thinking a guilty Rarely do scum fight against a guilty.

In post 1757, Datisi wrote:alch, do you really think scum!omega plays the way he did around scum!umlaut and now locks himself in a pr claim?

I said yesterday that I think Chaos is more important to the scumteam than Umlaut. They were happy to let Umlaut die but they need Chaos, and that’s why today he’s doing this PR pretending and throwing shade at Math.

In post 1772, Alchemist21 wrote:They were happy to let Umlaut die

there's a difference in "happy to let umlaut die" and "bussing him into the ground by pretending to have a guilty"...

In post 1759, Datisi wrote:

In post 1754, Gamma Emerald wrote:like, actively softing a guilty, today? I thought the deal was chaos got a guilty on umlaut yday

sorry, was* softing a guilty yesterday

it's been a very long night for me

Oh. Still don’t see it and I still think he’s scum here.