Mafiascum.net

Boop

i guess I’m just much more suspicious?

In post 1747, the worst wrote:surely something hard to anticipate seems radically earnest more often than it seems false idk

I think the opposite tbh

Large changes tend to be intentional.

36 hour prods? Hadn't realized.

Rules posts are fun to read.

In post 1752, PenguinPower wrote:Large changes tend to be intentional.

It wasn't a change, really.

Going by your descriptors it is.

In post 1659, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:To be honest, I'm kind of getting cold feet on the Gamma wagon too. His lack of confidence in his reads feels genuine.

Mm, still not really feeling it. His basically dropping of his read on me seems to me like wanting to get away from a subject that he looked bad on and have it be forgotten as soon as possible. From his perspective as theoretical town, I was the scum basically spearheading his miselimination. With a read like that, you either keep calling for that person's death up until your own, or if you change your mind on them you'd certainly make some point of explaining it. The the nonexplained dropping of the read into just move onto another vote, and then another shift of course onto the only viable counterwagon doesn't seem genuine to me. It reads more like he thought that he could win when it came to the competing wagon with me, that didn't pan out and then he moved onto the only other one that could work, while trying to drop everything he said about me because it didn't look good.

I never really dropped the read on you lol

In post 1661, the worst wrote:i leave y'all alone for one night and THIS happens

VOTE: enchant

In post 1667, the worst wrote:wanna start off a shock 11th hour counterwagon?
want to get a claim out of enchant?
you are a furball full of potential rn.

Think that unless you genuinely and strongly want Enchant over Gamma today this is pretty strongly anti-town, even disregarding my reads on either player. Especially the getting a claim out of Enchant part, don't see a reason to push for more claims unless like I said you strongly want an elim there.

In post 1758, Gamma Emerald wrote:I never really dropped the read on you lol

I'm not talking about your internal state of mind which I can't possibly know, I'm talking about what you've demonstrated to the thread via your posting. And what I've seen I believe supports what I just said.

Eh - gut says that gamma’s town. Who’s next in your line?

In post 1682, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Lowkey also not a fan of Miss Midnight disappearing again after the wagon shifted off of her : (

Missing one single day is "disappearing"? Christ. This just... makes me sad. I am sorry that I can't be here all the time. I'm trying to make the most of the time when I am here, and I think I do so decently. Is it still not enough?

In post 1761, PenguinPower wrote:Eh - gut says that gamma’s town. Who’s next in your line?

Well, awkwardly you would be pretty close up next.

Oof - you aren’t doing so well this game.

In post 1683, the worst wrote:i totally made a tier list of last minute flashwagon prospects. omitted myself for obvious reasons, but i think i'd flatter myself to say that i rank in around b.

{thor}
{flea, manatee}
{miss midnight}
{ss}
{bee, pp}
{csf, titus, auro, house}

Is... is top a better or worse prospect? Bottom is worse, right?

I thought the same. It’s inverted.

In post 1764, PenguinPower wrote:Oof - you aren’t doing so well this game.

Maybe. We'll see, I suppose. But I'm having a fun time with my best buddies, so in the end, aren't I the real winner here no matter what?

I mean - I hope we’re all having fun so we’re all winners by that metric.

Being correct is also fun and you don’t seem to be doing so well by that one.

In post 1762, Miss Midnight wrote:

In post 1682, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Lowkey also not a fan of Miss Midnight disappearing again after the wagon shifted off of her : (

Missing one single day is "disappearing"? Christ. This just... makes me sad. I am sorry that I can't be here all the time. I'm trying to make the most of the time when I am here, and I think I do so decently. Is it still not enough?

I'm just needy, that's all.

And honestly, I hadn't realized there were 36 hour prods either, so I thought you were gone longer...

In post 1768, PenguinPower wrote:I mean - I hope we’re all having fun so we’re all winners by that metric.

Being correct is also fun and you don’t seem to be doing so well by that one.

Ok. Without trying to come across as snarky, let me know when you want to tell me something more interesting or nuanced than "you're wrong".

Feel free to be snarky because I am saying that.

Without trying to come across as snarky, let me know when you want to tell me why I’m next in line.

Sorry - I’m trying to be snarky so take it that way.

In post 1734, Thor Ragnarok wrote:When she's here, she seems very interested in the game and energetic. So it doesn't correlate that she's had very long stretches of inactivity and had to be prodded twice. It means that interest and engagement when she is here may be fake, since she seems disinterested to post actively outside of it.

Fuck off.

Was that meant to be snarky?