Mafiascum.net

In post 1748, Tanner wrote:sell me why this isn't your scumgame - without ate-y stuff

This isn't my scum game because:

A) I provided what I think was a very protown sort, which we now know forced scum Luke to, objectively, either face a tough game with a town implosion or force a suboptimal swap because there were two scum jammed together.

B) I have put myself out there on a limb this game with concrete read predictions that I can be held accountable for if I'm wrong. Ari is a good example of this. You can see I was suss of her off and on throughout the game, at times very certain I was right and at other times trying to engage and re-evaluate. This is basically true of my stance on all the players in the game except you and imaginality.

C) I honestly have fucked up understanding the mech of the game an embarrassing number of times. I would have more dignity as scum than to look like a complete dumbass so much.

D) you have apparently townpinged notably on a few things I never could have predicted would resonate with you.

E) Luke was legitimately coming after me several times and backing imaginality until you stated a town read of me clearly.

There's probably more stuff, but I'm just rattling off the top of my head here.

I wanted my flip to be first. I'm badgering you to an annoying level about voting. Both risky for a scum to do.

happy new year from the land of europe!

i had a vague plan of how fuckin cool would it be if i did my first post in 2022 as a hammer on imaginality and then we won this game but alas i am too much of a coward

This was my dream too

If you want a confidence boost, Tanner, should we flip the Wall first? Maybe, when you see the results, you can confidently hammer imaginality. Or, you don't have to at all because we win the Wall. After all, we only need to win two minigames in order to win. I propose that we should heed implosion's 1723 and then we can defeat those scum.

And by the way, I am not being sarcastic about my proposal.

In post 1755, RH9 wrote:If you want a confidence boost, Tanner, should we flip the Wall first? Maybe, when you see the results, you can confidently hammer imaginality. Or, you don't have to at all because we win the Wall. After all, we only need to win two minigames in order to win. I propose that we should heed implosion's 1723 and then we can defeat those scum.

why do you think that me seeing the wall flip will give me the confidence i need to hammer imaginality???

i have 9!!! tabs open on this game and i do not remember what ANY of them are!!!

In post 1757, Tanner wrote:

In post 1755, RH9 wrote:If you want a confidence boost, Tanner, should we flip the Wall first? Maybe, when you see the results, you can confidently hammer imaginality. Or, you don't have to at all because we win the Wall. After all, we only need to win two minigames in order to win. I propose that we should heed implosion's 1723 and then we can defeat those scum.

why do you think that me seeing the wall flip will give me the confidence i need to hammer imaginality???

Because you can use associatives.

HOW can i use those associatives?? how will they bring me to scum!imaginality???

i'm stuck with
scumfuck vp who is trying every angle he can to pocket me
implo who's not solving the game because he's busy writing poetry
and rh9 who i think is just laughing at me every post he makes

goddamn this game i miss aristeia

Hammer imaginality, win at life for 2022

In post 1760, Tanner wrote:HOW can i use those associatives?? how will they bring me to scum!imaginality???

Remember his readslist. I think that if he is scum, his buddy is hidden there and a Wall flip will prove it.

P-edit: I miss Aristeia too.

vp while i'm arguing with rh9: nowhere to be seen

vp when i call him scum: there in less than two minutes

In post 1758, Tanner wrote:i have 9!!! tabs open on this game and i do not remember what ANY of them are!!!

you have 162 tabs open???????????

i'm not great at math, but isn't 9! like much larger than 162, implo are you drunk already

Why are numberQ, implosion, and me, never online at the same time? I need to discuss with them, who to flip.

In post 1764, Tanner wrote:vp while i'm arguing with rh9: nowhere to be seen

vp when i call him scum: there in less than two minutes

Just checking in between when I die at fortnite

In post 1768, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 1764, Tanner wrote:vp while i'm arguing with rh9: nowhere to be seen

vp when i call him scum: there in less than two minutes

Just checking in between when I die at fortnite

What a coincidence!

this is where i would ask if you play apex but i myself have not played it in like far over a year now and i suck at it anyway so

In post 1769, RH9 wrote:

In post 1768, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 1764, Tanner wrote:vp while i'm arguing with rh9: nowhere to be seen

vp when i call him scum: there in less than two minutes

Just checking in between when I die at fortnite

What a coincidence!

You check just when Tanner calls you scum and not during Tanner's interaction with me.

And FYI, that was what I meant by coincidence.

In post 1766, Tanner wrote:i'm not great at math, but isn't 9! like much larger than 162, implo are you drunk already

Alas, no.

In post 1773, implosion wrote:

In post 1766, Tanner wrote:i'm not great at math, but isn't 9! like much larger than 162, implo are you drunk already

Alas, no.

I almost forgot that you are a 'Polymath'.