Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:15 pm
gamma can you explain more now why you wanted to wait to explain your eiralox vote?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
This is the reaction I was expecting from a scum!Gamma.In post 1748, Gamma Emerald wrote:I also see Frog and obscure being pally, kinda makes me think I’m onto something
VOTE: Frogsterking
I’ll go here first because I think there’s better traction here
so trueIn post 1753, Aristeia wrote:Ydrasse is an angel
Yeah I was hoping to pressure Eiralox but failed to remember he was getting replacedIn post 1750, fireisredsir wrote:gamma can you explain more now why you wanted to wait to explain your eiralox vote?
All of your reads I quoted within 1732 I would define as cagey. If you would like to expand on them and make them non-cagey then I think that's fair.In post 1742, ConManMick wrote:What's cagey about it?
Based on what, exactly?In post 1754, Frogsterking wrote:This is the reaction I was expecting from a scum!Gamma.In post 1748, Gamma Emerald wrote:I also see Frog and obscure being pally, kinda makes me think I’m onto something
VOTE: Frogsterking
I’ll go here first because I think there’s better traction here
You reacted this way in a game we played over a year ago which you don't remember.In post 1759, Gamma Emerald wrote:Based on what, exactly?In post 1754, Frogsterking wrote:This is the reaction I was expecting from a scum!Gamma.In post 1748, Gamma Emerald wrote:I also see Frog and obscure being pally, kinda makes me think I’m onto something
VOTE: Frogsterking
I’ll go here first because I think there’s better traction here
In post 1757, Nero Cain wrote:thats L-1 claim
Yes. D2.In post 1761, Gamma Emerald wrote:Efobbbio?
I’m calling your bluff
I'm interpreting Gamma's silence here as being caught.
Coming soonIn post 1751, Ydrasse wrote:need a votecount like crazy rn
In post 1767, Frogsterking wrote:I'm interpreting Gamma's silence here as being caught.
It looks like Gamma knows I'm not bluffing and is frozen...In post 1768, Gamma Emerald wrote:What else is there to say until/unless I fact check that game?
In post 1621, ConManMick wrote:Literally just that I remembered thinking "yeah I want to vote that", I'll go back and get whatever it was that bothered meIn post 1507, scamper wrote:what do u mean "most memorable"?In post 1505, ConManMick wrote:I read the first 15ish pages last night when I requested the slot and a couple of folks are on my radar, off the top of my head joining in Datisi was most memorable of those so sent it there.
fwiw, i still want to know what bothered u even if u dont have the read anymore...In post 1714, ConManMick wrote:My Datisi read I think is wrong for now and I'm gonna move my vote. Later stuff certainly appears to be working toward a solve. Page 28 interactions with FB aside but I thing ye all talked about that enough.
Unironically, scum!Gamma also reacted this way to me in aIn post 1772, Gamma Emerald wrote: