Mafiascum.net

;

;

MariaR, Frogsterking, Big Chungus Gaming, Toogeloo
Save The Dragons, MathBlade, Cape90
Enchant, marcistar
furtiveglance
PookyTheMagicalBear

Not_Mafia, MalcolmTucker, Titus

modorator notes

• ba ba ba

In post 1729, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.

She said do what you think is best. But we can wait the three hours.

I need to see an updated read list from BGC.

@Malcolm

Thank you for posting yours btw. I feel like you have a very non-suspicious looking read list.

I'm stopped for gas.

Math needs to be shut up about his nonsense of me being scum because I disagree. If you're certain it will go ahead.

In post 1753, Titus wrote:I'm stopped for gas.

Math needs to be shut up about his nonsense of me being scum because I disagree. If you're certain it will go ahead.

Oh sis

Depending upon how this shakes up if you are town you might be conf and alive.

Depends on if Pooky is truthtelling or not.

So please give me a bit of space without implying I suck every few minutes.

In post 1672, MathBlade wrote:I am very much of the opinion anyone opposing BGC at this point is scum or aiding scum.

I have an incredibly wild theory about BGC and their D1 play. They didn't say anything to make me Town read them.

In post 1755, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1672, MathBlade wrote:I am very much of the opinion anyone opposing BGC at this point is scum or aiding scum.

I have an incredibly wild theory about BGC and their D1 play. They didn't say anything to make me Town read them.

Ftr—> Frogger is changing his read and I didn’t say what kind of tpr.

I followed Titus last night and she performed an investigative action

I'm assuming she got some kind of inno on Frogster cuz she said this:

In post 1588, Titus wrote:

In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.

Which really makes sense only if you're TPR and you're crumbing your night 1 inno - therefore she should be town.

In post 1756, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1755, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1672, MathBlade wrote:I am very much of the opinion anyone opposing BGC at this point is scum or aiding scum.

I have an incredibly wild theory about BGC and their D1 play. They didn't say anything to make me Town read them.

Ftr—> Frogger is changing his read and I didn’t say what kind of tpr.

I've never changed any reads since you've entered the game AFAIK. I'm trying to explain a little bit more than I did before because I'm less convinced that you're obvscum now.

In post 1757, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I followed Titus last night and she performed an investigative action

I'm assuming she got some kind of inno on Frogster cuz she said this:

In post 1588, Titus wrote:

In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.

Which really makes sense only if you're TPR and you're crumbing your night 1 inno - therefore she should be town.

Cool. I am a voyeur.

I find 3 ITPRs very rare.

No one visited Cape90. I doubt three ITPRs exist so to me one of you or Titus are scum.

In post 1757, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I followed Titus last night and she performed an investigative action

I'm assuming she got some kind of inno on Frogster cuz she said this:

In post 1588, Titus wrote:

In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.

Which really makes sense only if you're TPR and you're crumbing your night 1 inno - therefore she should be town.

Looks phishy. I suggest no one confirm or deny what Pooky is saying. I'm willing to follow Math today as long as they listen to Titus and I.

i don't really consider voyeur powerful enough to be on the level of investigative because it literally can't get guilties or innos

In post 1358, MathBlade wrote:Town but creepy

Very deep thought there.

In post 1360, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1346, Cape90 wrote:

In post 1344, furtiveglance wrote:

In post 1342, Cape90 wrote:im just here wondering what happened to the WIM of furtive

That was Fennec, I'm me.

you were solving a lot when you came in, said you were gonna elaborate on your reads later, ended up kinda not doing so. Also marcistar is quite literally at the top of your readslist you posted day 1, AKA 922

you have explained your scumreads somewhat but never really touched on really anything else

Cape you’re one of the top posters and I want to see a summary of where you’re coming from. I see an

abscence of consolidation around you

and you’re a hyper poster (comparatively) and I want to find out why.

In post 1358, MathBlade wrote:Town but

creepy

Very deep thought there.

Underlines are mine

UNVOTE:

Pooky do you have any such crumbs?

In post 418, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

hows this for a crumb

In post 1761, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i don't really consider voyeur powerful enough to be on the level of investigative because it literally can't get guilties or innos

It can when people claim like you did.

Works for me

So now let’s see if based on Titus’s TPR we can either A) Break this shit open
Or B) scum between the pair

(And yes I am trying to give Titus the benefit of the doubt)

Because if we can confirm Titus Frog Pooky and myself in a single day I will put on rose colored glasses

I'm pretty sure we're all town and I didn't need to claim anything to figure this out

I feel like Town!pooky had other options of how to play this situation. This whole interaction just feels like a big phishing attempt. I disagree that Titus comment looks like an inno soft, I've used that expression before because 95% can imply p < 0.05 which is one benchmark for statistical significance.

In post 1768, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I'm pretty sure we're all town and I didn't need to claim anything to figure this out

I think we did because 5 town confirmed in 16P is not normal.

It’s a golden rule of normals that you don’t have that many confirms.

In post 1766, MathBlade wrote:Works for me

I don't get the crumb.

In post 1769, Frogsterking wrote:I feel like Town!pooky had other options of how to play this situation. This whole interaction just feels like a big phishing attempt. I disagree that Titus comment looks like an inno soft, I've used that expression before because 95% can imply p < 0.05 which is one benchmark for statistical significance.

And if Pooky is scum, then my role as voyeur is designed to catch him.

It’s literal main use is to catch fake claimers. Otherwise as Pooky said it’s kind of shit.

Which is why we can use it to create a circle of trust.