With 8 players, it takes 5 to make a decision. Day 3 ends in (expired on 2022-11-05 15:00:00).
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:06 am
by Aisa
In post 7, Thestatusquo wrote:I'm V/LA for this weekend watching my mets lose to the padres but I think we'd be better off not voting N_M and just letting him do his normal lurk forever and never post anything of relevance shtick for a while, just for old times sakes.
I also have Thoughts balance wise - don't expect them to be anything revolutionary, they're only slightly novel - but probably best hold off until we do massclaim, since it seems like that's happening.
No
No
Nooooo
(As in, I do not want this to be true, but I recognise that given the Hard Realities of today I probably need to reevaluate at some point).
In post 1710, Grib wrote:[...]
Aisa’s reaction here is good I think.
What is good about it?
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:23 am
by Grib
It was the same as my internal monologue.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:28 am
by Grib
Having more than four TPRs in a small game is already pretty weird for me to imagine, but five? With three of them being townfirmed to each other? That is completely crazy.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:32 am
by Grib
I guess I’ll acknowledge that those Shea posts do make it sound possible. I just personally think three Masons in this game is fucking weird, and it feels very lose-lose to me. Either kill NM and he flips Mason (Grib, you moron, you killed a claimed Mason!) or don’t kill him and he ends up being mafia (Grib, you moron, there’s no room for a third Mason in this setup!)
In post 1754, Grib wrote:It was the same as my internal monologue.
Omg stop
I also had the thought that you were still probably town for the same reason
Although I also thought that if anything in this game is in my scumrange, it is those reaction posts, so logically I shouldn't be taking your reaction as AI.
Yeah actually I had already checked TSQ and probably HPE's ISOs back when NM claimed mason the first time around, lol. I remember that something at the time led me to conclude that NM probably wasn't Mason, but couldn't remember what it was, and I think you've just found the post.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:48 am
by Grib
Hi Eira. You have a lot of content to respond to.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:48 am
by Aisa
Eiraaaa omg to cite Bella, if you are scum I will be sad face. Anyway, I'm taking that post to mean you don't CC any of the claims?
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:50 am
by Grib
Wait how does it make him less likely? Because HPE didn’t really mention him at all?
Somebody should figure out if this is a good idea.
I gave it like five minutes of thought and I don't see it hurting massively (I doubt there's like, that much left for Town to claim anyway), so I would be pro massclaim. Let's say I'll demand a popcorn massclaim in 12 hours or so, unless someone tells me not to do it?
Also, summary of current claims:
Frog - Doctor - protected TSQ N1, protected ??? N2.
Bella - Vig (not a full claim) - vigged HPE N1, did not act N2.
Not Mafia - "Mason"
I was on Enchant N2 cuz I thought they were vig
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:57 am
by Aisa
In post 1763, Grib wrote:Wait how does it make him less likely? Because HPE didn’t really mention him at all?
Yes, I would guess that if HPE and NM were masons together, HPE would have talked about that slot a bit more. Although ISOing HPE, it doesn't talk about TSQ that much either, except when it agrees with some of TSQ's point. And maybe the fact that HPE felt the need to say "third prod of doom" means something?
Ugh
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:58 am
by Aisa
Updated current claims:
Frog - Doctor - protected TSQ N1, protected Enchant N2.
Bella - Vig (not a full claim) - vigged HPE N1, did not act N2.
Not Mafia - Mason
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 11:58 am
by Eiralox
In post 1761, Grib wrote:Hi Eira. You have a lot of content to respond to.
no. until your pivot comes with a case i won't be doing much talking.
In post 1763, Grib wrote:Wait how does it make him less likely? Because HPE didn’t really mention him at all?
Yes, I would guess that if HPE and NM were masons together, HPE would have talked about that slot a bit more. Although ISOing HPE, it doesn't talk about TSQ that much either, except when it agrees with some of TSQ's point. And maybe the fact that HPE felt the need to say "third prod of doom" means something?
Ugh
I mean, the slots are totally different. TSQ was active, NM could safely not be talked about. I thought the same, that maybe HPE acknowledging the third prod was like, a teeny tiny bit of a TMI slip if you squint?
Could also just be massively reading into nothing.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 12:03 pm
by Eiralox
In post 1762, Aisa wrote:Eiraaaa omg to cite Bella, if you are scum I will be sad face. Anyway, I'm taking that post to mean you don't CC any of the claims?
In post 1761, Grib wrote:Hi Eira. You have a lot of content to respond to.
no. until your pivot comes with a case i won't be doing much talking.
This is not a town response, by the way. I could see Eira being hostile towards me specifically, but now he's taking the game hostage by choosing not to participate.
-
I used a combo generator or whatever it's called to sort all living players (except me) into potential scumteams of two. I took out combinations that contained Frog, Bella, and Aisa (even though Aisa isn't a PR claim, she's just my strongest townread).
Thought about taking out NM teams in case the claim is real, but I left them in just in case.
Kill everyone whose name starts with E; win. Unless NM is scum, then we all just suck. I'd like to start with Eiralox, unless I believe his actions to be town-motivated and change my mind.
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 12:07 pm
by Eiralox
good luck
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 12:08 pm
by Grib
This really isn't the time to be cryptic.
You need to play the game to help your team. Don't sit in a corner to spite me.
