Page 72 of 93

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:43 am
by Selkies
In post 1771, Majiffy wrote:Because AA9's makes sense, your claim would be suicidal if scum, which leaves us with an IC, BG, and BP if his claim is legit.

That's incredibly powerful for a Micro.
2 one shots (one fatal) plus an IC? It doesn't sound that powerful. If I had thought there could be even a 1 shot protection in the game, though, I would have wanted to veto our PGO gambit. My idea of a town gambit is dropping a vague PR tell or two when VT.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:47 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 1774, Majiffy wrote:^ And then we have Jake the obvscum here. How you're reading that slot town is beyond me, Selkies.
You tried to kill me last night?

I'm obv town, Sven was pretty obv town if you know his play.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:50 am
by Jake from State Farm
Setup spec is scummy. Worrying about balance is a scumtell.

Lynch jiffy now

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:52 am
by borkjerfkin
ANNOUNCEMENT

Selkies is a
Town Innocent Child.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:59 am
by Selkies
Thanks, bork

- f

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:02 am
by Jake from State Farm
So today we lunch majiffy or Jenn

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:02 am
by Jake from State Farm
*lynch*

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:07 am
by Selkies
cannibal

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:08 am
by Selkies
@Jake Why is Rach not in your willing to lynch list, btw?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:18 am
by Jake from State Farm
Cause Jen and jiffy are scum. Jen slipped with the hammer and jiffy slipped with all his scummy shit

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:18 am
by Majiffy
In post 1776, Jake from State Farm wrote:You tried to kill me last night?

I'm obv town, Sven was pretty obv town if you know his play.
Lolwut

And you are far from obvtown, sorry brah.

Please note Jake's shift in play from wanting to lynch Selkies to tunneling me as soon as I voted him. That's scum survivalism.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:24 am
by Selkies
In post 1762, Selkies wrote:
1) You mean where he tried to get you lynched, realized there was no support, and then renegged on his 'read'? Yeah. That wasn't a town process, mate.
Isn't this like EXACTLY what you did
Orcinus is talking about day 1 here. You argued with OrciSelkies for page after page on day 1, pushing our lynch. You kept it up all the way to the point where I posted a WoT at Varsoon and he unvoted us. He voted DO and then you followed him.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:24 am
by Jake from State Farm
Selekies is mod confirmed you dolt. Of course I'm not lynching him.

I called you out before you voted me btw so your vote was omgus

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:27 am
by Jake from State Farm
Also jiffy if you beleived "scum survivalism" you'd be voting Jen. But she's your partner so you won't.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:52 am
by Majiffy
In post 1786, Selkies wrote:Orcinus is talking about day 1 here. You argued with OrciSelkies for page after page on day 1, pushing our lynch. You kept it up all the way to the point where I posted a WoT at Varsoon and he unvoted us. He voted DO and then you followed him.
There's a very strong difference between the two situations you're trying to link. If you really
need
me to explain why, I can, but this is just stupid.
In post 1787, Jake from State Farm wrote:Selekies is mod confirmed you dolt. Of course I'm not lynching him.
Before he was mod confirmed, dolt.

This defense just shows you have no actual defense, so you're deflecting.
In post 1787, Jake from State Farm wrote: I called you out before you voted me btw so your vote was omgus
^ And more of the same, eh?
In post 1788, Jake from State Farm wrote:Also jiffy if you beleived "scum survivalism" you'd be voting Jen. But she's your partner so you won't.
Uhh... what?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:59 am
by Jake from State Farm
1. I wanted to lynch Selkies for lying and nothing more

2. Blah blah, flail more jiffy

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:01 am
by Selkies
In post 1789, Majiffy wrote:There's a very strong difference between the two situations you're trying to link. If you really need me to explain why, I can, but this is just stupid.
Is it time to break out the VCA? The use is kind of limited without a scum flip, but there could be something in the vote movements among what we now know are some town wagons.

-f

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:05 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 1771, Majiffy wrote:Because AA9's makes sense, your claim would be suicidal if scum, which leaves us with an IC, BG, and BP if his claim is legit.

That's incredibly powerful for a Micro.
1. 1 shot bg & 1 shot BP w/IC is NOT OP'd

2. Only scum worry about setups being OPd for town. I made this mistake as scum and have seen other scum do this.

Lynch jiffy he knows better

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:15 am
by Selkies
In post 1792, Jake from State Farm wrote:
In post 1771, Majiffy wrote:Because AA9's makes sense, your claim would be suicidal if scum, which leaves us with an IC, BG, and BP if his claim is legit.

That's incredibly powerful for a Micro.
1. 1 shot bg & 1 shot BP w/IC is NOT OP'd

2. Only scum worry about setups being OPd for town. I made this mistake as scum and have seen other scum do this.


Lynch jiffy he knows better
The bolded is not true in my little corner of the mafia world. Considering if the claims on the table overpower town is part of evaluating role claims that could be false. But, I agree that the 3 roles don't appear to add up to an overpowered town.

- f

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:20 am
by Jake from State Farm
Here's the kicker also

It's mylo, if we lynch wrong it's game over. Majiffy has been pushing a claimed pr since day 1 by doing nothing to discredit this slot. He never provided any good reason to lynch Sven



P.edit - well I have seen it at least twice if not more than twice.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:39 am
by Majiffy
In post 1790, Jake from State Farm wrote:1. I wanted to lynch Selkies for lying and nothing more
You
seriously
wanted to push a
policy lynch
on a claimed PR on MYLO.

There's no way around how obvscum that is. I'm sorry.
In post 1791, Selkies wrote:
In post 1789, Majiffy wrote:There's a very strong difference between the two situations you're trying to link. If you really need me to explain why, I can, but this is just stupid.
Is it time to break out the VCA? The use is kind of limited without a scum flip, but there could be something in the vote movements among what we now know are some town wagons.
It's not VCA it's timing and persistence. I found your slot scummy, and eventually decided it was just Orci's play that was rubbing me, not the slot. Sven was purely motivated by getting rid of a claimed PR ASAP.
In post 1794, Jake from State Farm wrote:It's mylo, if we lynch wrong it's game over. Majiffy has been pushing a claimed pr since day 1 by doing nothing to discredit this slot. He never provided any good reason to lynch Sven
Loooool. What was that you were pushing earlier? Lynch all liars? Self-vote, scumbutt.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:44 am
by Jake from State Farm
He wasn't mod confirmed and he hasn't claimed his role yet so yes I absolutely considered the idea of policy lynching him, but I didn't.

Sorry jiffy, you are getting lynched today. Maybe you should self vote

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:46 am
by Jake from State Farm
And both original heads are dead to me on this site. I shall not play with either of them if I can help it

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:48 am
by Jake from State Farm
also let's point out that jiffy thought my slot was scum yet hopped on the varsoon wagon after I voted him despite calling varsson town earlier in the game

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:49 am
by Jake from State Farm
In post 417, Majiffy wrote:
Town
{DBK, Icebox, RachMarie,
Varsoon
}

Null
{Disturbed_One, Jennifer}
Scum
{Selkies, Sven}