Mafiascum.net

In post 1765, petroleumjelly wrote:1.) Dragon of the West, earlier you balked at switching from Creature because he was the "wagon with the most votes." Now that Creature does not have the most votes you are still preferring to keep your vote on him as opposed to switching to NJAC. Why?

I balked at switching because he both had the most votes and is who I wanted lynched. My argument to eggman was that it didn't make any sense to take my vote off just because he was getting replaced. I still don't like the NJAC wagon over the creature wagon, so I'm reluctant to switch

Hello, you guys. How's going ?

Ready for some new life in this game. Welcome to the silent thread that is Mini 1805. How are you Shiro?

In post 1776, Shiro wrote:Hello, you guys. How's going ?

I see you replaced into a scum slot

Shiro you should hurry with your fakeclaim

In post 1778, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1776, Shiro wrote:Hello, you guys. How's going ?

I see you replaced into a scum slot

Nope all town here DGB. ^_^

Haven't read anything yet.

I will skim the thread soonish but any sort of summary from people would be appreciated

From the little I read (start of day 2 to page 64) I kinda really don't like petrol also his vote on Dgb is bad.

Dgb you used to townread creature. Go back to that and let's be friends D:

Your avatar is so adorable I want to be friends with you but I don't think that's happening :c

In post 1783, F-oh-ex wrote:Your avatar is so adorable I want to be friends with you but I don't think that's happening :c

Let the avatar mesmerise you

In all seriousness though I am still town soooo hope exists yo.

In post 1772, Titus wrote:Yeah, still think NJAC is scum. I don't like his woah is me posts. No one will think a case on them is good.

What do you mean by "woah is me posts"?

In post 1783, F-oh-ex wrote:Your avatar is so adorable I want to be friends with you but I don't think that's happening :c

And I asked you some questions. Please answer them.

In post 1766, NJAC wrote:

In post 1744, petroleumjelly wrote:I preferred MarioManiac4's Day One play to NJAC's play

Why is that?

Largely because MarioManiac4 did not crossvote with crazycrabman at the end of Day One. It was a little gesture that makes me think he is more likely to be Town. I can believe he was a Townie disinterested in the game. I had semi-compared his play here to another game where he was scum, and near the end of Day One I asked him questions specifically to try to compare his play here to there.

Since you have replaced in, your play has largely consisted of promises to read the game (which you still have not done) and sarcastic comments towards players' reads. You are now the second player in that slot who seems to be in a constant state of "needing to catch up" and based on your posting you likely won't start giving helpful reads until we are pushed up against another deadline.

In post 1787, petroleumjelly wrote:

In post 1766, NJAC wrote:

In post 1744, petroleumjelly wrote:I preferred MarioManiac4's Day One play to NJAC's play

Why is that?

Largely because MarioManiac4 did not crossvote with crazycrabman at the end of Day One. It was a little gesture that makes me think he is more likely to be Town. I can believe he was a Townie disinterested in the game. I had semi-compared his play here to another game where he was scum, and near the end of Day One I asked him questions specifically to try to compare his play here to there.

Since you have replaced in, your play has largely consisted of promises to read the game (which you still have not done) and sarcastic comments towards players' reads. You are now the second player in that slot who seems to be in a constant state of "needing to catch up" and based on your posting you likely won't start giving helpful reads until we are pushed up against another deadline.

Correction: I did not ask MarioManiac4 questions to compare his play near the end of Day One. That was done at the start of Day Two. His answers (Post #1404) sound honest enough (and boil down to "I play every game a bit different depending on the situation"), and are not very alignment-indicative. That was also the last day he posted, and he has not posted on the site since that day. On the whole it looks less like lurking and more like disinterest.

Ok, you´re right. His play seemed to be better than what I've done. I've found it a little harder than expected to keep my promise of catching up . Still working on it.

In post 1754, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 1753, DrippingGoofball wrote:Let's actually not lynch NJAC until we're at deadline and have gotten all the responses from Shiro we need to come to a good conclusion about him

Hello, Shiro!

DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1776, Shiro wrote:Hello, you guys. How's going ?

I see you replaced into a scum slot

Care to explain, DGB? How does a friendly introduction mean an insta-scumread?

NJAC wrote:One more thing: most people on my wagon are not trying to figure out my alignment, but rather pushing for a mislynch. Obviously there's at least one or two scum on it.

Bold statement, considering there are only three people voting you right now.

In post 1787, petroleumjelly wrote:

In post 1766, NJAC wrote:

In post 1744, petroleumjelly wrote:I preferred MarioManiac4's Day One play to NJAC's play

Why is that?

Largely because MarioManiac4 did not crossvote with crazycrabman at the end of Day One. It was a little gesture that makes me think he is more likely to be Town.

Not crossing = town? If anything it's anti town, since he puts himself closer to being lynched, which is poor form if you're a townie.

In post 1790, Eggman wrote:Care to explain, DGB? How does a friendly introduction mean an insta-scumread?

I am pretty sure the scumread was from before I entered the picture

@NJAC

There's no good reason to wagon me = woah is me. Also implies there's a right reason.

I am confident you're scum. That doesn't mean not scumhunting. This deflect then attack posture is still scummy.

You should answer for the lack of scumhunting in your ISO. Omgus is not scumhunting. You tried to copy me and just float.

Damn this game is inactive

Ok.guys I know what we need to do



I dislike how he has stayed on the sideline with an icky vote on dgb, furthermore from what I just isoed he didn't enter the main wagon on that crabmeat yesterday either. Suspicious stuff all around

In post 1746, Eggman wrote:

In post 1729, Derek12 wrote:

@Eggman

What are your thoughts on NJAC/DBG? I mean them specifically, not their predecessors.

i will come back to this question tomorrow, but for now i'll just say that i feel like dgb hasn't been playing the game completely seriously

Please respond

If Shiro flips scum, I could see Eggman being scum with them.

In post 1797, Derek12 wrote:If Shiro flips scum, I could see Eggman being scum with them.

And why would that be ?

In post 1796, Derek12 wrote:

In post 1746, Eggman wrote:

In post 1729, Derek12 wrote:

@Eggman

What are your thoughts on NJAC/DBG? I mean them specifically, not their predecessors.

i will come back to this question tomorrow, but for now i'll just say that i feel like dgb hasn't been playing the game completely seriously

Please respond

Aw heck, I knew there was something I forgot.
NJAC strikes me as a little lazy, from his copying of Titus's OP and forgetting to catch up. But his latest post seems OK about that? Also, why did we keep on the daytalk "scumslip" - I admit I skimmed around that part, but it just seems now that Titus was trying to make a mountain out of a molehill, since daytalk is in the OP.

DGB is very erratic. But she's maintained a scumread on NJAC / MM4 since she replaced in, up until NJAC made a post calling out "boring"posts. I don't like that sudden read swap very much, as I'd expect someone's scumreads to stay consistent. Feels to me like a flimsy way to get off NJAC's wagon while keeping her current meta of erratic posting. I don't know.