Mafiascum.net

I'm a he but I don't mind being called a she 'cause I'm a beautiful princess

I don't mind being called a she either. regardless of being an ugly monkey.

In post 1716, Near x Mello wrote:mastina is now townreading us

Not quite. I don't see a scumteam including you that makes sense as being probable--that doesn't make you a townread, it just neuters the scumread. Lacking options, if desperate, I'd lynch you, I'd just be incredibly unhappy about it because I wouldn't expect a scumflip.

In post 1709, Morality wrote:Disagree. Charismatic rallying, not manipulating.

I've seen your rallying.

This isn't it.

In post 1729, Tatsuya Kaname wrote:

In post 2, Tatsuya Kaname wrote:

IMPORTANT: UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE, YOU MAY ONLY ACTIVATE ONE ACTION EACH PHASE.

NOTE THAT THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE FACTIONAL KILLS AND ANY PASSIVE ABILITIES THAT ACTIVATE AUTOMATICALLY

.

And there you have it.

Being Loud is worthless, because all scum can both kill and action, meaning being confirmed as targeting someone else does not mean that the person couldn't have killed that same night.

In post 1769, Morality wrote:He’s doing it to mimic a successful townie play.

There is someone this statement much, much, MUCH better applies to.

Good thing just being loud was never the part that could confirm. I just also happen to be loud.

In post 1779, mastina wrote:

In post 1769, Morality wrote:He’s doing it to mimic a successful townie play.

There is someone this statement much, much, MUCH better applies to.

I wonder whoever do you mean. You didn’t think I was being townie, so can’t be me.

In post 1751, Joan of Arc wrote:

In post 1748, Near x Mello wrote:easy examples off the top of my head; me pushing jake in symphonic metal and nero in your game

~Near

Well, I modded one of these games and the other had happened before I wisened up, so both examples are invalid.

what the hell does modding have to do with it
You were still reading it right? Oh wait you were afk for a lot of it carry on lmfao

In post 1766, Almost50 wrote:I think I want to pull a N_M in this game. I'll just pop-up to lol!hammer someone

try it if you want lol
I think you're town enough to not care

In post 1780, Morality wrote:Good thing just being loud was never the part that could confirm. I just also happen to be loud.

Doesn't matter.

Confirmed role != confirmed alignment.

With the exception of ACTUAL masons, innocent childs, and friendly neighbors.
It is rather clearly self-evident you are none of those.

There isn't a role in the game you could have aside from one of those that could ever make me think you are town. Mass-doc? Sane cop? Super-inventor? Role enabler? Role disabler? Nope, not a one. Nothing in any of those roles inherently implies town.

Knowing about the existence of those roles and letting them live a single night?

Nope, still doesn't make you town.
Knowing about the existence of a role allows you to neutralize or otherwise contain the role to be utilized in the most pro-scum way possible while still masked as a pro-town agenda.

I've used this tactic before (deliberately letting a strong town role live in spite of knowing about it), Cerb's used this tactic before, and if you claim you haven't, you're a dirty rotten liar because you know damn good and well you've done so too.

In post 1781, Morality wrote:

In post 1779, mastina wrote:

In post 1769, Morality wrote:He’s doing it to mimic a successful townie play.

There is someone this statement much, much, MUCH better applies to.

I wonder whoever do you mean. You didn’t think I was being townie, so can’t be me.

I do indeed think you're not being townie.
Doesn't mean you're not mimicking a successful townie play as scum.

Note that mimicries need not be perfect. They need not be exact replicas. They need only sell the of being identical.

You have sold the idea that what you are doing is your towngame--there are differences, clear as day, present, but the narrative of it being your "successful townie play" is still what you push regardless.

In post 1777, mastina wrote:

In post 1716, Near x Mello wrote:mastina is now townreading us

Not quite. I don't see a scumteam including you that makes sense as being probable--that doesn't make you a townread, it just neuters the scumread. Lacking options, if desperate, I'd lynch you, I'd just be incredibly unhappy about it because I wouldn't expect a scumflip.

In post 1709, Morality wrote:Disagree. Charismatic rallying, not manipulating.

I've seen your rallying.

This isn't it.

someone with more experience with her tell me if mastina always makes empty meaningless statements like this

it's not a defense, it's not a case, it's not an argument
it's "x is/isn't y" because she said so

it's starting to annoy me is all

like, so far, nobody has told me anything that would even slightly shake my townread on morality
and yet you act like i shouldn't be townreading him for my own sake

Yeah, all I’m really hearing is “Morality is scum who’s townie.”

Which is a fair statement, I guess, I’m just actually town, so I know it’s wrong. If there were any actual cases against me, I’d happily tear them down, but at this point, I’m just going to start looking for remaining town members and start to work a Poe.

I stopped understanding the game since Mastina started voting Morality
help

Joan, Clemency, Pink Ball, why is it obvious that Morality is a villager based on hood posts

Don't tell me its because of claim cause that's dumb

I started reading posts from the newest to the oldest and look what happened!

In post 1793, Torque wrote:Don't tell me its because of claim cause that's dumb

What claim?

In post 1792, Torque wrote:Joan, Clemency, Pink Ball, why is it obvious that Morality is a villager based on hood posts

I find Morality towny independent of the hood.

They apparently all claimed to each other in the hood

we were all more or less mutually townreading before claims

In post 1791, Torque wrote:I stopped understanding the game since Mastina started voting Morality
help

In post 1791, Torque wrote:I stopped understanding the game since Mastina started posting