Mafiascum.net

In post 1768, Dannflor wrote:I have tried to push through I think 3 different wagons now other than Jake this day phase

every single one has lost momentum and I'm starting to think it's not possible because the loudest voices refuse to move from Jake

I'm getting sick of this gamestate and I want it to progress and unfortunately I'm not sure that it does if he doesn't die

Keep trying, Im pretty sure itll work eventually

In post 1711, PenguinPower wrote:It’s cool. We can call things trash without discussion. This is mafia!

discussing it would require us to talk about the game before you replaced in, something you don't seem too fond in doing

In post 1712, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 1711, PenguinPower wrote:It’s cool. We can call things trash without discussion. This is mafia!

"This quotation is of the lowest quality, and it belongs with the rest of the filth. If you try to converse with me on this, I will be forced to simply not reply."

you're defending his response for not reading the game

In post 1716, Dannflor wrote:Dramonic is town and I'm now of the opinion that Hiraki is pocketing him.

Dram and I have had the same opinion with both of us starting them at different times in multiple points in this game. How is that pocketing? If it was one sided, sure. But it's clearly not.

In post 1716, Dannflor wrote:I don't know if it's just the game state to blame, but the stuff he's choosing to post is just so incredibly surface level and off that it feels like he's just posting to post and stay afloat with his status in the game.

It is the gamestate which is also why you voted with me??? The person who is incredibly dodging in posting real content and just posting half-wit ERP retorts is not dead yet?

In post 1716, Dannflor wrote:It makes sense, he's not in danger anymore and doesn't really need to do anything to protect himself, especially with dramonic (and me) around.

Yeah you can fuck right off with this.

In post 1716, Dannflor wrote:I don't buy that he's just stuck on Jake being scum that hard for that to affect his entire game play.

In post 1274, Dannflor wrote:I think you guys need to pull your heads out of your asses and realize that just because you haven't gotten along with Menalque in this game specifically doesn't mean he isn't town. And at this point refusing to reevaluate him is extremely anti-town.

ok

In post 1720, RCEnigma wrote:Regardless of Jake's flip, the slots that are on wagon and don't directly scumread the slot look gross. I mean the slots that don't really care if he's town or not because he's not useful. Town is town in a game that you have a small margin for error.

Why say this rather than pointing out the people who are actually in this category?

In post 1769, PenguinPower wrote:Jake is an easy wagon with a paused deadline. I haven’t seen a good reason for him over someone like Dunn or Marashu besides “gamestate.”

Again, reading the game would help. But let's not even say that - you don't even need to read the game. You're going to tell me that Jake>Dunn? Really?

In post 1756, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1718, Dunnstral wrote:

Intent to hammer

Can’t be bothered to answer questions or....do much of anything can you?

I did not see them.

In post 1772, Dannflor wrote:VOTE: Marashu

iirc last time I tried this Bell wouldn't vote there and then anyone else off the Jake wagon only wanted to push their own vanity wagons

Maybe? My opinion on them is pretty neutral

In post 1735, teacher wrote:Apologies to keep flipping myself, but Im not comfortable with what is basically a 9-3 consensus lynch,

The scum teams only have 2 people each

BAD REASONING. I'll call it out every time I see it.

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:Why say this rather than pointing out the people who are actually in this category?

This was mostly at Teacher and he knows this.

In post 1774, dramonic wrote:gosh, I wonder if reading the game you replace in would help

Actually it wouldn't, smartass. There's a reason I don't read up on replace in beyond laziness.

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:Again, reading the game would help. But let's not even say that - you don't even need to read the game. You're going to tell me that Jake>Dunn? Really?

I'm going to tell you that Jake>Dunn, really. Like...really really.

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:discussing it would require us to talk about the game before you replaced in, something you don't seem too fond in doing

Not sure where I said that. Not reading 48 pages on replace in /= not willing to talk about things that happened prior to replace in. Point them out.

In post 1780, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1774, dramonic wrote:gosh, I wonder if reading the game you replace in would help

Actually it wouldn't, smartass. There's a reason I don't read up on replace in beyond laziness.

"What is this reason?"

It's mostly a waste of time for me since I get most of my reads from interactions with people.

In post 1784, PenguinPower wrote:It's mostly a waste of time for me since I get most of my reads from interactions with people.

"I have tried this, and failed multiple times. For starters, not everyone interacts with you."

In post 1782, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:discussing it would require us to talk about the game before you replaced in, something you don't seem too fond in doing

Not sure where I said that. Not reading 48 pages on replace in /= not willing to talk about things that happened prior to replace in. Point them out.

so i now need to feed you the information in the game? hmm

In post 1786, Hiraki wrote:

In post 1782, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:discussing it would require us to talk about the game before you replaced in, something you don't seem too fond in doing

Not sure where I said that. Not reading 48 pages on replace in /= not willing to talk about things that happened prior to replace in. Point them out.

so i now need to feed you the information in the game? hmm

TIL pointing out the things you want to discuss is feeding people information.

i don't want to discuss them, they've already been discussed. that's my entire point

In post 1710, Hiraki wrote:i don't agree with the above but i don't think it's worth an argument

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:discussing it would require us to talk about the game before you replaced in, something you don't seem too fond in doing

In post 1789, Hiraki wrote:i don't want to discuss them, they've already been discussed. that's my entire point

TIL you can have an entire point that's different from what you said but people should understand that!

What a trash response.

In post 1788, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1786, Hiraki wrote:

In post 1782, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:discussing it would require us to talk about the game before you replaced in, something you don't seem too fond in doing

Not sure where I said that. Not reading 48 pages on replace in /= not willing to talk about things that happened prior to replace in. Point them out.

so i now need to feed you the information in the game? hmm

TIL pointing out the things you want to discuss is feeding people information.

"You lack the ability to discuss what you do not know, as you do not know it."

I’m not going to be able firm up on Marashu with his current posts.
My vote would be noodley.

I’m coming around to the jake elimination just so we can move forward perspective.
We really are stalled here. Though it feels gross.

This game is.. this game is

In post 1790, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 1710, Hiraki wrote:i don't agree with the above but i don't think it's worth an argument

In post 1776, Hiraki wrote:discussing it would require us to talk about the game before you replaced in, something you don't seem too fond in doing

In post 1789, Hiraki wrote:i don't want to discuss them, they've already been discussed. that's my entire point

TIL you can have an entire point that's different from what you said but people should understand that!

What a trash response.

this literally makes no sense lol, stay butthurt for not playing the game properly and getting called out on it

Are you for real lol,

You didn't say that you didn't want to discuss because they'd already been discuss, so it wasn't your entire point until you decided you wanted it to be.

Mena was probs right about you.

(also, not butthurt, just making fun of your use of trash because it's lame)

In post 1793, Bell wrote:I’m coming around to the jake elimination just so we can move forward perspective.
We really are stalled here. Though it feels gross.

"If I am not your optimal execution, then who? I won't vote myself, but I do feel that my hiraki vote is wasted."

In post 1797, PenguinPower wrote:(also, not butthurt, just making fun of your use of trash because it's lame)

lol