Mafiascum.net

Norwegian I think you have rare gut read skill particularly in early game. If it's possible could you forget everything and reread people's first few posts and nut out some reads based on that, I'd be really interested to know what you think if you're willing.

In post 1750, House wrote:

In post 1747, Gamma Emerald wrote:why is voting FMFT part of your reset?

That's where I was prior to my mental fart.

makes sense

In post 1752, cyrus62 wrote:

In post 1740, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1624, cyrus62 wrote:i want to test something besides me no town vote on nk15

I'm guessing this means you're entertaining a theory that you're the only town vote on NK15 currently?

no that only town is on them

okay that's actually more than I expected after I read a little further
I'll consider what it means myself if that's the case

In post 1773, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1702, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You've stated JJH is completely or incredibly likely to be town, and i state my opposition to that.
And here we are.

I've noticed most of your communication with nsg seems to be regarding disagreements. I'd like to see y'all maybe hash out which reads you can see eye-to-eye on.

I agree Cyrus town and FMFT low i guess?

that's a good start
now the important part is nsg building around that

In post 1775, Moongrass wrote:Norwegian I think you have rare gut read skill particularly in early game. If it's possible could you forget everything and reread people's first few posts and nut out some reads based on that, I'd be really interested to know what you think if you're willing.

Um ok, but mostly just doing it because that sounds interesting.

In post 429, House wrote:VOTE: Free Money Free Tea

I believe in neither of these things.

In post 430, Not Known 15 wrote:

In post 429, House wrote:VOTE: Free Money Free Tea

I believe in neither of these things.

VOTE: Free Money Free Tea
Nor do I.

In post 431, nomnomnom wrote:VOTE: FMFT

Scummy third vote without any text.
-Nomnomnom

In post 438, Free Money Free Tea wrote:ALRIGHT SCUM WHO WILL WE KILL

"the pr!"

"the guy who srs us!"

"wait, kill someone?"

.....!

Jingle was the moderator.

Town post.
+Free Money Free Tea

In post 462, jjh927 wrote:Like, please do not at any point question decisions that the stumps may or may not have made with regards to power roles, as getting them to defend those choices is akin to rolefishing

Town post
+JJH

In post 463, Not_Mafia wrote:^ Boring

Response to JJH good.
+NM

Mastina's first post was meh too.

In post 1697, Moongrass wrote:I think there's clearly a split in the game with jjh mastina on one side and Fey nm on the other. If both groups are town then the game gets tricky.

okay, so I've seen a post like this in a kinda-recent game, and before I can make a fair comparison I need your judgement on where you think scum is in this dichotomy. I don't need exact names, just how much in each side.

I checked the activity overview and it seems like the Feys' activity has fallen off a little. Not sure what to make of that yet.

In post 1784, Gamma Emerald wrote:I checked the activity overview and it seems like the Feys' activity has fallen off a little. Not sure what to make of that yet.

I noticed that as well.
Was thinking of voting there earlier for that reason.

In post 1784, Gamma Emerald wrote:I checked the activity overview and it seems like the Feys' activity has fallen off a little. Not sure what to make of that yet.

If you want to go down that road, I'll fabricate a case against you out of thin air and throw the great wallpost of China at you.

You know I can do it. You've seen it happen.

In post 1775, Moongrass wrote:Norwegian I think you have rare gut read skill particularly in early game. If it's possible could you forget everything and reread people's first few posts and nut out some reads based on that, I'd be really interested to know what you think if you're willing.

Based on what by the way? Where did you get that impression from?

In post 1786, House wrote:

In post 1784, Gamma Emerald wrote:I checked the activity overview and it seems like the Feys' activity has fallen off a little. Not sure what to make of that yet.

If you want to go down that road, I'll fabricate a case against you out of thin air and throw the great wallpost of China at you.

You know I can do it. You've seen it happen.

I'm sorry what? Why the sudden reaction? I don't get why me pointing out the activity situation -> you pushing me.

like, my concern is I didn't actually telegraph any sort of direction I was considering with that comment, I just brought it up. So why are like "don't you fucking do it bro!"?

In post 1788, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1786, House wrote:

In post 1784, Gamma Emerald wrote:I checked the activity overview and it seems like the Feys' activity has fallen off a little. Not sure what to make of that yet.

If you want to go down that road, I'll fabricate a case against you out of thin air and throw the great wallpost of China at you.

You know I can do it. You've seen it happen.

I'm sorry what? Why the sudden reaction? I don't get why me pointing out the activity situation -> you pushing me.

There's plenty of other trails to follow before sniffing out activity issues.

The Feys will keep. If it continues onto D2, sure... I can see a little impatience.

Everybody deserves a little time now and then. That's why I'm not pushing up on Titus, right now.

Okay
but like, I was just vocalizing something. Both heads of that hydra are generally active players, so seeing 0 posts for almost a day atp is intriguing. I think an explanation probably exists, I just don't want to ignore it rn

In post 1791, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay
but like, I was just vocalizing something. Both heads of that hydra are generally active players, so seeing 0 posts for almost a day atp is intriguing. I think an explanation probably exists, I just don't want to ignore it rn

They're also not d1 concerns.

Let's focus on what we have.

okay, what do we have?

In post 1793, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay, what do we have?

We have an excellent dark horse in nomnomnom.

I like dark horses.

What's your read on that slot?

Overall, I think people who are posting but fall in the consensus null range are far more deserving of a wagon than those who are absent, awkward, or unsure of themselves on day-freaking-one.

In post 1795, House wrote:Overall, I think people who are posting but fall in the consensus null range are far more deserving of a wagon

A lot of people think i'm town though

In post 1794, House wrote:

In post 1793, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay, what do we have?

We have an excellent dark horse in nomnomnom.

I like dark horses.

What's your read on that slot?

has kinda felt town through interactions with moon but aside from that hasn't felt like a priority sort so I don't have much

In post 1796, nomnomnom wrote:

I said I like dark horses.