Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2021 12:04 pm
i have no problems claiming
Neither do I, but I only participate in massclaims via popcorn method.In post 1775, Save The Dragons wrote:i have no problems claiming
On who. You? Your claim was extremely suspicious and I don't feel like it fits into the game. I don't think I've seen roleblockers in minis so why should I think there is one here?In post 1773, T3 wrote:bad shade yesterday
I mean I agree, but I'm not sure why you would assume that it's a real claim instead of made up.In post 1780, House wrote:Why would a Mafia TA need a false positive (cool cookie)?
It certainly can be useful, but that's not the problem.In post 1779, House wrote:Can somebody walk me through why we would not have a TA since redtea was a gated vig?
Weak/Loyal/Disloyal, I'd understand, but Complex just told him whether the player is PR/Vanilla.
Would 2 power roles that can both give false positives not be the rough equivalent of 1 actually useful investigational role?
PT Cop is a new role to me. It didn't exist when I was here last.In post 1784, Three wrote:It certainly can be useful, but that's not the problem.In post 1779, House wrote:Can somebody walk me through why we would not have a TA since redtea was a gated vig?
Weak/Loyal/Disloyal, I'd understand, but Complex just told him whether the player is PR/Vanilla.
Would 2 power roles that can both give false positives not be the rough equivalent of 1 actually useful investigational role?
What use does Town have for being able to find Neighbors? TA can find scum, sure, but Neighbor Finder has no real town use, and the fact that both Neighbors are BP just seems more helpful for scum to find than town.
I am however willing to listen to a town case for a Neighbor Finder given the context of our Neighbors being BP in a set up that is confirmed to have a BP Traitor.
Because it's a dumb claim to make up?In post 1783, Dwlee99 wrote:I mean I agree, but I'm not sure why you would assume that it's a real claim instead of made up.In post 1780, House wrote:Why would a Mafia TA need a false positive (cool cookie)?
Roleblockers are rare and very strong so if there is one it might be gatedIn post 1787, Three wrote:Also why wasn't T3 blocked? We already think he's fake claiming, but if he's town why would scum risk not blocking him in case he is actually fake claiming and has a more substantial PR?
To put it another way, if I was scum and T3 was town, I don't start randomly blocking other people. It's just such an unnecessary risk.
I recommend everyone else think through that hypothetical situation themselves. If you're scum and T3 is town, do you really risk not blocking him Night 2?
Why would he claim blocked n2 but not n3 if he's lying when claiming to be blocked again n3 would be more believable?In post 1787, Three wrote:Also why wasn't T3 blocked? We already think he's fake claiming, but if he's town why would scum risk not blocking him in case he is actually fake claiming and has a more substantial PR?
To put it another way, if I was scum and T3 was town, I don't start randomly blocking other people. It's just such an unnecessary risk.
I recommend everyone else think through that hypothetical situation themselves. If you're scum and T3 is town, do you really risk not blocking him Night 2?
Sorry, I misremembered.In post 1263, T3 wrote:Odd Night Traffic Analyst Even Night Neighbor FinderIn post 1247, Almost50 wrote:@T3: I dunno if you're Town or Scum, but delaying your full claim any further is scummy as hell. It gives the impression you're faking and afraid to specify lest you be CC'd. IF you're Towm you're dead already, unless you can convince a protective to be on you, and I doubt anyone will be convinced by "I'm an investigative"
I don't disagree too much with this.In post 1785, Dwlee99 wrote:Neighbor finder sounds useless as either alignment to me. People claim that anyway
That's kind of my point, it's only half useful for town if true.In post 1786, House wrote:PT Cop is a new role to me. It didn't exist when I was here last.In post 1784, Three wrote:It certainly can be useful, but that's not the problem.In post 1779, House wrote:Can somebody walk me through why we would not have a TA since redtea was a gated vig?
Weak/Loyal/Disloyal, I'd understand, but Complex just told him whether the player is PR/Vanilla.
Would 2 power roles that can both give false positives not be the rough equivalent of 1 actually useful investigational role?
What use does Town have for being able to find Neighbors? TA can find scum, sure, but Neighbor Finder has no real town use, and the fact that both Neighbors are BP just seems more helpful for scum to find than town.
I am however willing to listen to a town case for a Neighbor Finder given the context of our Neighbors being BP in a set up that is confirmed to have a BP Traitor.
I don't know the intracacies and full utility of it.
A method of testing claims, perhaps? That doesn't confirm alignment, though. The other half of his role is more useful for that, if he's town.
IDK. :/
Do you have some raisins to go with that potato salad?In post 1771, T3 wrote:TheZenMan - lean town
House - lean town
Save The Dragons - lock town
Three - null town
T3
Jacket - scum
Dwlee99 - lean scum
HawaiianPizza - town
A scum team that has only has two mafia and a gated role blocker sounds odd. But I can't judge balance here.In post 1791, Dwlee99 wrote:Roleblockers are rare and very strong so if there is one it might be gatedIn post 1787, Three wrote:Also why wasn't T3 blocked? We already think he's fake claiming, but if he's town why would scum risk not blocking him in case he is actually fake claiming and has a more substantial PR?
To put it another way, if I was scum and T3 was town, I don't start randomly blocking other people. It's just such an unnecessary risk.
I recommend everyone else think through that hypothetical situation themselves. If you're scum and T3 is town, do you really risk not blocking him Night 2?